The effect of water absorption and specific gravity of supplementary cementitious materials on required water

IF 10.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Krishna Siva Teja Chopperla , Gopakumar Kaladaran , Anna K. Kochaver , O. Burkan Isgor , W. Jason Weiss
{"title":"The effect of water absorption and specific gravity of supplementary cementitious materials on required water","authors":"Krishna Siva Teja Chopperla ,&nbsp;Gopakumar Kaladaran ,&nbsp;Anna K. Kochaver ,&nbsp;O. Burkan Isgor ,&nbsp;W. Jason Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) is projected to increase because they reduce the global warming potential of concrete. When cement is replaced with SCM, the flow of the mixture may change. The porosity of the paste may also change as the liquid-to-solid volumes change when mass replacement is used. This paper discusses the role of water absorption and the specific gravity of the SCM on the water requirements of a mixture. Over thirty SCMs were tested, including sixteen natural pozzolans, ten coal ashes, three blended pozzolans, and one ground glass. The porosity of the SCM was measured using a drying rate test. The water absorbed by the natural pozzolans ranged from 3.25 to 17.25 %, 5.55–9.25 % for blended pozzolans, 4.10–18.95 % for coal ashes, and 4.20 % for ground glass. The water requirement measured using ASTM <span><span>C311</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> ranged from −4.25 to 46.2 %. The specific gravity of the SCM is particularly important when it is significantly different from the specific gravity of the OPC, as this can change the liquid-to-solid volume ratio. Accounting for the absorption of water by the SCM and the specific gravity of the SCM (via volume replacement) resulted in 55 % of the specimens having a water demand within ±5 % of the original mixture to achieve the same flow, and 94 % of the samples had a water demand within ±20 %. This was substantially less than mass replacement. Using volume replacement and accounting for SCM absorption would have water requirements more similar to the original mixtures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9865,"journal":{"name":"Cement & concrete composites","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 105808"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cement & concrete composites","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958946524003810","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) is projected to increase because they reduce the global warming potential of concrete. When cement is replaced with SCM, the flow of the mixture may change. The porosity of the paste may also change as the liquid-to-solid volumes change when mass replacement is used. This paper discusses the role of water absorption and the specific gravity of the SCM on the water requirements of a mixture. Over thirty SCMs were tested, including sixteen natural pozzolans, ten coal ashes, three blended pozzolans, and one ground glass. The porosity of the SCM was measured using a drying rate test. The water absorbed by the natural pozzolans ranged from 3.25 to 17.25 %, 5.55–9.25 % for blended pozzolans, 4.10–18.95 % for coal ashes, and 4.20 % for ground glass. The water requirement measured using ASTM C311 ranged from −4.25 to 46.2 %. The specific gravity of the SCM is particularly important when it is significantly different from the specific gravity of the OPC, as this can change the liquid-to-solid volume ratio. Accounting for the absorption of water by the SCM and the specific gravity of the SCM (via volume replacement) resulted in 55 % of the specimens having a water demand within ±5 % of the original mixture to achieve the same flow, and 94 % of the samples had a water demand within ±20 %. This was substantially less than mass replacement. Using volume replacement and accounting for SCM absorption would have water requirements more similar to the original mixtures.
辅助胶凝材料的吸水性和比重对所需水量的影响
由于胶凝补充材料(SCM)可降低混凝土的全球升温潜能值,因此其使用量预计会增加。用 SCM 替代水泥时,混合物的流动性可能会发生变化。当使用大规模替代时,随着液固体积的变化,浆体的孔隙率也会发生变化。本文讨论了吸水性和单体材料比重对混合料需水量的影响。对三十多种单质进行了测试,包括十六种天然毛细管、十种煤灰、三种混合毛细管和一种磨碎的玻璃。单质材料的孔隙率是通过干燥速率测试测量的。天然灰泥的吸水率为 3.25% 至 17.25%,混合灰泥为 5.55% 至 9.25%,煤灰为 4.10% 至 18.95%,碎玻璃为 4.20%。使用 ASTM C311 测量的需水量介于 -4.25% 到 46.2% 之间。当 SCM 的比重与 OPC 的比重相差较大时,SCM 的比重尤为重要,因为这会改变液体与固体的体积比。考虑到单体材料的吸水性和单体材料的比重(通过体积置换),55% 的试样的需水量在原始混合物的 +5% 以内,以达到相同的流动性,94% 的试样的需水量在 +20% 以内。这大大低于质量置换。采用体积置换并考虑单体材料的吸收,其需水量与原始混合物更为接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cement & concrete composites
Cement & concrete composites 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
11.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Cement & concrete composites focuses on advancements in cement-concrete composite technology and the production, use, and performance of cement-based construction materials. It covers a wide range of materials, including fiber-reinforced composites, polymer composites, ferrocement, and those incorporating special aggregates or waste materials. Major themes include microstructure, material properties, testing, durability, mechanics, modeling, design, fabrication, and practical applications. The journal welcomes papers on structural behavior, field studies, repair and maintenance, serviceability, and sustainability. It aims to enhance understanding, provide a platform for unconventional materials, promote low-cost energy-saving materials, and bridge the gap between materials science, engineering, and construction. Special issues on emerging topics are also published to encourage collaboration between materials scientists, engineers, designers, and fabricators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信