Biogas Residue Carbonization Rather Than Biogas Residue Promoted the Yield of Pakchoi and Reduced the N2O Production Potential in Horticultural Soil

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hao Ouyang, Yufeng Song, Qianqian Yu, Yindi Zhou, Feifan Zhang, Hongyue Wang, Lei Zhong
{"title":"Biogas Residue Carbonization Rather Than Biogas Residue Promoted the Yield of Pakchoi and Reduced the N2O Production Potential in Horticultural Soil","authors":"Hao Ouyang, Yufeng Song, Qianqian Yu, Yindi Zhou, Feifan Zhang, Hongyue Wang, Lei Zhong","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biogas residue (BR) and biogas residue-derived biochar (BRC) are widely used as substitute for inorganic Nitrogen (N) fertilizers in vegetable production. Yet, their comparative research on vegetable production and N<sub>2</sub>O production was still lacking. Here, the pot experiment of pakchoi (<i>Brassica chinensis</i>) with a gradient of BR or BRC application rates (0, 30%, 60%, 100% w/w) was carried out to simulate different N fertilizer substitution rates. The results showed that the pakchoi yield had no difference between BR or BRC and control treatments; BRC had more advantages than BR in maintaining or increasing the pakchoi yield. BR and BRC could all reduce N<sub>2</sub>O production potential in vegetable soils. But BRC had a stronger ability to inhibit denitrification while BR had a stronger ability to inhibit nitrification compared with each other. The results showed that BR and BRC had different regulatory pathways for pakchoi yield and N<sub>2</sub>O production. BR regulated the pakchoi yield majorly through nitrification, but BRC majorly through denitrification. It suggested that BR and BRC could partially or completely replace inorganic fertilizers without reducing pakchoi yield. BRC combined with chemical fertilizers was a higher intelligence strategy in vegetable systems to improve pakchoi yield and N<sub>2</sub>O production compared with BR. It provided a theoretical basis for the application of BR and BRC to nutrient cycling and microbial processes in the soil-vegetable system.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biogas residue (BR) and biogas residue-derived biochar (BRC) are widely used as substitute for inorganic Nitrogen (N) fertilizers in vegetable production. Yet, their comparative research on vegetable production and N2O production was still lacking. Here, the pot experiment of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis) with a gradient of BR or BRC application rates (0, 30%, 60%, 100% w/w) was carried out to simulate different N fertilizer substitution rates. The results showed that the pakchoi yield had no difference between BR or BRC and control treatments; BRC had more advantages than BR in maintaining or increasing the pakchoi yield. BR and BRC could all reduce N2O production potential in vegetable soils. But BRC had a stronger ability to inhibit denitrification while BR had a stronger ability to inhibit nitrification compared with each other. The results showed that BR and BRC had different regulatory pathways for pakchoi yield and N2O production. BR regulated the pakchoi yield majorly through nitrification, but BRC majorly through denitrification. It suggested that BR and BRC could partially or completely replace inorganic fertilizers without reducing pakchoi yield. BRC combined with chemical fertilizers was a higher intelligence strategy in vegetable systems to improve pakchoi yield and N2O production compared with BR. It provided a theoretical basis for the application of BR and BRC to nutrient cycling and microbial processes in the soil-vegetable system.
沼气残渣碳化而非沼气残渣可提高百草枯的产量并降低园艺土壤中产生 N2O 的可能性
沼气渣(BR)和沼气渣衍生生物炭(BRC)在蔬菜生产中被广泛用作无机氮肥的替代品。然而,它们在蔬菜生产和一氧化二氮产生方面的比较研究仍然缺乏。在此,研究人员对大白菜(Brassica chinensis)进行了盆栽实验,模拟了不同氮肥替代率下的梯度施用量(0、30%、60%、100% w/w)。结果表明,BR 或 BRC 与对照处理的白菜产量无差异;在保持或增加白菜产量方面,BRC 比 BR 更有优势。BR 和 BRC 都能降低蔬菜土壤中产生 N2O 的潜力。但相比之下,BRC 的反硝化抑制能力更强,而 BR 的硝化抑制能力更强。结果表明,BR 和 BRC 对白菜产量和 N2O 产量的调节途径不同。BR主要通过硝化作用来调节椿树产量,而BRC则主要通过反硝化作用来调节椿树产量。这表明,BR 和 BRC 可以部分或完全替代无机肥料,而不会降低椿树产量。与 BR 相比,BRC 与化肥相结合是蔬菜系统中提高百草枯产量和一氧化二氮产量的更高智能策略。该研究为 BR 和 BRC 在土壤-蔬菜系统养分循环和微生物过程中的应用提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信