Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 promote infected wound healing via regulation of the wound microenvironment

IF 5.7 2区 生物学
Zhe Yin, Yilin Wang, Xiaojuan Feng, Changqing Liu, Xiaoyang Guan, Shuyan Liu, Zhanyi Long, Zhonghua Miao, Fang He, Ruyue Cheng, Yanting Han, Ka Li
{"title":"Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 promote infected wound healing via regulation of the wound microenvironment","authors":"Zhe Yin,&nbsp;Yilin Wang,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Feng,&nbsp;Changqing Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Guan,&nbsp;Shuyan Liu,&nbsp;Zhanyi Long,&nbsp;Zhonghua Miao,&nbsp;Fang He,&nbsp;Ruyue Cheng,&nbsp;Yanting Han,&nbsp;Ka Li","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infected wounds can result in complex clinical complications and delayed healing, presenting a significant global public health challenge. This study explored the effects of topical application of two probiotics, <i>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</i> GG (LGG) and <i>Bifidobacterium animalis</i> subsp. <i>lactis</i> BB-12, on the microenvironment of infected wounds and their impact on wound healing. LGG and BB-12 were applied separately and topically on the <i>Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus)</i>-infected skin wounds of the rat model on a daily basis. Both probiotics significantly accelerated wound healing, demonstrated by enhanced granulation tissue formation and increased collagen deposition, with BB-12 showing superior efficacy. LGG and BB-12 both effectively inhibited neutrophil infiltration and decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Notably, BB-12 markedly reduced IL-6 levels, while LGG significantly lowered TNF-α, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Additionally, both probiotics promoted macrophage polarization towards the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Microbiota analysis revealed that LGG and BB-12 significantly decreased the abundance of pathogenic bacteria (e.g. <i>Staphylococcus</i> and <i>Proteus</i>) and increased the proportion of beneficial bacteria (e.g. <i>Corynebacterium</i>). Particularly, BB-12 was more effective in reducing <i>Staphylococcus</i> abundance, whereas LGG excelled in promoting <i>Corynebacterium</i> growth. These findings suggest the ability of LGG and BB-12 to modulate the wound microenvironment, enhance wound healing and provide valuable insights for the management of infected wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":209,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1751-7915.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-7915.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infected wounds can result in complex clinical complications and delayed healing, presenting a significant global public health challenge. This study explored the effects of topical application of two probiotics, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, on the microenvironment of infected wounds and their impact on wound healing. LGG and BB-12 were applied separately and topically on the Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus)-infected skin wounds of the rat model on a daily basis. Both probiotics significantly accelerated wound healing, demonstrated by enhanced granulation tissue formation and increased collagen deposition, with BB-12 showing superior efficacy. LGG and BB-12 both effectively inhibited neutrophil infiltration and decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Notably, BB-12 markedly reduced IL-6 levels, while LGG significantly lowered TNF-α, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Additionally, both probiotics promoted macrophage polarization towards the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Microbiota analysis revealed that LGG and BB-12 significantly decreased the abundance of pathogenic bacteria (e.g. Staphylococcus and Proteus) and increased the proportion of beneficial bacteria (e.g. Corynebacterium). Particularly, BB-12 was more effective in reducing Staphylococcus abundance, whereas LGG excelled in promoting Corynebacterium growth. These findings suggest the ability of LGG and BB-12 to modulate the wound microenvironment, enhance wound healing and provide valuable insights for the management of infected wounds.

鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 和动物双歧杆菌亚种 BB-12 通过调节伤口微环境促进感染伤口愈合
感染性伤口可导致复杂的临床并发症和延迟愈合,对全球公共卫生构成重大挑战。本研究探讨了局部应用鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG(LGG)和动物双歧杆菌亚种 BB-12 这两种益生菌对感染伤口微环境的影响及其对伤口愈合的影响。每天将 LGG 和 BB-12 分别局部涂抹在大鼠模型被金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)感染的皮肤伤口上。两种益生菌都能明显加速伤口愈合,表现为肉芽组织形成和胶原沉积增加,其中 BB-12 的疗效更佳。LGG 和 BB-12 都能有效抑制中性粒细胞的浸润,降低促炎细胞因子肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)的表达。值得注意的是,BB-12 显著降低了 IL-6 水平,而 LGG 则显著降低了 TNF-α、转化生长因子-β (TGF-β) 和血管内皮生长因子 (VEGF)。此外,两种益生菌都能促进巨噬细胞向抗炎 M2 表型极化。微生物群分析表明,LGG 和 BB-12 能显著减少致病菌(如葡萄球菌和变形杆菌)的数量,增加有益菌(如棒状杆菌)的比例。特别是,BB-12 能更有效地减少葡萄球菌的数量,而 LGG 则能更好地促进棒状杆菌的生长。这些研究结果表明,LGG 和 BB-12 能够调节伤口微环境,促进伤口愈合,并为感染伤口的管理提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial Biotechnology
Microbial Biotechnology Immunology and Microbiology-Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.50%
发文量
162
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Microbial Biotechnology publishes papers of original research reporting significant advances in any aspect of microbial applications, including, but not limited to biotechnologies related to: Green chemistry; Primary metabolites; Food, beverages and supplements; Secondary metabolites and natural products; Pharmaceuticals; Diagnostics; Agriculture; Bioenergy; Biomining, including oil recovery and processing; Bioremediation; Biopolymers, biomaterials; Bionanotechnology; Biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers; Compatible solutes and bioprotectants; Biosensors, monitoring systems, quantitative microbial risk assessment; Technology development; Protein engineering; Functional genomics; Metabolic engineering; Metabolic design; Systems analysis, modelling; Process engineering; Biologically-based analytical methods; Microbially-based strategies in public health; Microbially-based strategies to influence global processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信