Prediction of Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Jialei Cao, Liyan Sun*, Fan Yin, Ran Zhang, Zixiang Gao and Rui Xiao, 
{"title":"Prediction of Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning","authors":"Jialei Cao,&nbsp;Liyan Sun*,&nbsp;Fan Yin,&nbsp;Ran Zhang,&nbsp;Zixiang Gao and Rui Xiao,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0298810.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Hydrogen energy holds promise for controlling emissions but is limited by the production cost and method. Chemical looping hydrogen production (CLHP) provides a more efficient and environmentally sustainable route to produce high-purity hydrogen compared with conventional methods. Yet, CLHP involves a series of operational variables, and the optimization of operating conditions is the critical issue for large-scale hydrogen production. In this study, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and physics-informed neural network (PINN) models are developed to predict hydrogen production rates by analyzing multiple process variables. Through the analysis of the database and experiments, we integrated physical consistency as prior physical knowledge into the PINN for eliminating the data dependence. All models are optimized for optimal performance through hyperparameters. The comparison of five machine learning models reveals that DT and RF models exhibit a characteristic step-like pattern in their predictions, while SVM and ANN models produce outputs that often diverge from the expected trend. The prediction of the PINN model exhibits good performance with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, mean squared error, and mean absolute percentage error scores of 0.882, 1.228, and 18.1%, respectively. The results are with high interpretability due to the physical-informed inherent feature. Then, the CLHP process is studied, and the relationships between hydrogen yield and operating temperature, gas flow rate, and mass fraction of iron oxide are established. This work shows the difference in the prediction curves between the different models. By training various general models and comparing their predictive performance on chemical looping data, we can gain valuable insights to guide subsequent predictions for CLHP. It will be beneficial for the design of oxygen carriers and the optimization of the CLHP process.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrogen energy holds promise for controlling emissions but is limited by the production cost and method. Chemical looping hydrogen production (CLHP) provides a more efficient and environmentally sustainable route to produce high-purity hydrogen compared with conventional methods. Yet, CLHP involves a series of operational variables, and the optimization of operating conditions is the critical issue for large-scale hydrogen production. In this study, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and physics-informed neural network (PINN) models are developed to predict hydrogen production rates by analyzing multiple process variables. Through the analysis of the database and experiments, we integrated physical consistency as prior physical knowledge into the PINN for eliminating the data dependence. All models are optimized for optimal performance through hyperparameters. The comparison of five machine learning models reveals that DT and RF models exhibit a characteristic step-like pattern in their predictions, while SVM and ANN models produce outputs that often diverge from the expected trend. The prediction of the PINN model exhibits good performance with R2, mean squared error, and mean absolute percentage error scores of 0.882, 1.228, and 18.1%, respectively. The results are with high interpretability due to the physical-informed inherent feature. Then, the CLHP process is studied, and the relationships between hydrogen yield and operating temperature, gas flow rate, and mass fraction of iron oxide are established. This work shows the difference in the prediction curves between the different models. By training various general models and comparing their predictive performance on chemical looping data, we can gain valuable insights to guide subsequent predictions for CLHP. It will be beneficial for the design of oxygen carriers and the optimization of the CLHP process.

利用物理信息机器学习预测化学循环制氢
氢能有望控制排放,但受到生产成本和方法的限制。与传统方法相比,化学循环制氢(CLHP)为生产高纯度氢气提供了一条更高效、更环保的途径。然而,化学循环制氢涉及一系列操作变量,操作条件的优化是大规模制氢的关键问题。本研究开发了支持向量机 (SVM)、决策树 (DT)、随机森林 (RF)、人工神经网络 (ANN) 和物理信息神经网络 (PINN) 模型,通过分析多个工艺变量来预测氢气生产率。通过对数据库和实验的分析,我们将物理一致性作为先验物理知识纳入 PINN,以消除数据依赖性。所有模型都通过超参数进行了优化,以获得最佳性能。对五种机器学习模型进行比较后发现,DT 和 RF 模型的预测结果呈现出一种特有的阶梯状模式,而 SVM 和 ANN 模型的输出结果往往偏离预期趋势。PINN 模型的预测结果表现良好,R2、平均平方误差和平均绝对百分比误差分别为 0.882、1.228 和 18.1%。由于物理信息的固有特征,结果具有很高的可解释性。然后,研究了 CLHP 工艺,并建立了氢气产量与操作温度、气体流速和氧化铁质量分数之间的关系。这项工作显示了不同模型之间预测曲线的差异。通过训练各种通用模型并比较它们对化学循环数据的预测性能,我们可以获得有价值的见解,为后续的 CLHP 预测提供指导。这将有利于氧气载体的设计和 CLHP 工艺的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信