Short-term evaluation of Cure Violence St. Louis: Challenges, triumphs, and lessons learned

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Theodore S. Lentz, Matt Vogel, Brenda Mathias, Alessandra Early, Kimberly Rey, Tobeya Ibitayo, Matifadza Hlatshwayo Davis
{"title":"Short-term evaluation of Cure Violence St. Louis: Challenges, triumphs, and lessons learned","authors":"Theodore S. Lentz,&nbsp;Matt Vogel,&nbsp;Brenda Mathias,&nbsp;Alessandra Early,&nbsp;Kimberly Rey,&nbsp;Tobeya Ibitayo,&nbsp;Matifadza Hlatshwayo Davis","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.12687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Firearm violence continues to be a leading cause of death in the United States. As alternatives to law enforcement intervention, community-based violence prevention programs, such as Cure Violence, have become increasingly popular across U.S. cities. This article documents the results of a multiyear, mixed-methods, quasi-experimental study of the implementation and impact of Cure Violence in St. Louis, Missouri, from 2020 to 2023. We analyzed data from semistructured interviews, a two-wave community survey, and police records of neighborhood violence, finding limited evidence of program effectiveness. Although some interview participants stated that the program had a positive impact, we observed no change in community norms/perceptions of violence, and our analysis of police data suggests that program implementation was associated with declining violence in only one of the three intervention sites.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This article highlights challenges of implementing and evaluating community-based violence prevention. More work is needed to unpack the mechanisms responsible for turning program activities into measurable impacts in both the short and long term. Implications for planning and evaluating community-based violence prevention programs are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":"23 4","pages":"981-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Summary

Firearm violence continues to be a leading cause of death in the United States. As alternatives to law enforcement intervention, community-based violence prevention programs, such as Cure Violence, have become increasingly popular across U.S. cities. This article documents the results of a multiyear, mixed-methods, quasi-experimental study of the implementation and impact of Cure Violence in St. Louis, Missouri, from 2020 to 2023. We analyzed data from semistructured interviews, a two-wave community survey, and police records of neighborhood violence, finding limited evidence of program effectiveness. Although some interview participants stated that the program had a positive impact, we observed no change in community norms/perceptions of violence, and our analysis of police data suggests that program implementation was associated with declining violence in only one of the three intervention sites.

Policy Implications

This article highlights challenges of implementing and evaluating community-based violence prevention. More work is needed to unpack the mechanisms responsible for turning program activities into measurable impacts in both the short and long term. Implications for planning and evaluating community-based violence prevention programs are discussed.

对圣路易斯市 "治愈暴力 "项目进行短期评估:挑战、胜利和经验教训
研究摘要枪支暴力仍然是美国人死亡的主要原因。作为执法干预的替代方案,以社区为基础的暴力预防计划(如 "治愈暴力")在美国各城市越来越受欢迎。本文记录了一项多年期、混合方法、准实验性研究的结果,研究内容是 2020 年至 2023 年在密苏里州圣路易斯市实施的 "治愈暴力 "项目及其影响。我们分析了来自半结构式访谈、两波社区调查和警方记录的邻里暴力事件的数据,发现项目成效的证据有限。虽然一些访谈参与者表示该计划产生了积极影响,但我们观察到社区规范/对暴力的看法没有发生变化,而且我们对警方数据的分析表明,在三个干预地点中,只有一个地点的计划实施与暴力事件的减少有关。我们还需要做更多的工作来了解将项目活动转化为短期和长期可衡量影响的机制。文章还讨论了规划和评估社区暴力预防项目的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信