Forces to Be Reckoned with: Countervailing Powers and Physician Emotional Distress during COVID-19.

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Tania M Jenkins,Liza Buchbinder,Mara Buchbinder
{"title":"Forces to Be Reckoned with: Countervailing Powers and Physician Emotional Distress during COVID-19.","authors":"Tania M Jenkins,Liza Buchbinder,Mara Buchbinder","doi":"10.1177/00221465241281371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The \"countervailing powers\" framework conceptualizes health care as an arena for power contests among key stakeholders, drawing attention to the moves, countermoves, and alliances that have challenged physicians' dominance since the 1970s. Here, we focus on one of the lesser known micro-level consequences of such forces for physicians: emotional distress. We draw on 145 interviews with frontline physicians across four U.S. cities during the COVID-19 pandemic to trace physicians' experiences with three countervailing forces: the state, health care organizations, and patients. We find that threats to physician dominance eroded physicians' sense of mastery (perceived personal control) at work, thereby prompting emotional distress, including anger and moral conflict. Conversely, in certain cases, acts of resistance may have helped increase mastery, thus moderating distress. Our findings advance the countervailing powers framework by elucidating some of the micro-level, personal consequences of macro-level power struggles and offer practical implications for understanding contemporary threats to physician dominance.","PeriodicalId":51349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Social Behavior","volume":"1 1","pages":"221465241281371"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Social Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465241281371","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The "countervailing powers" framework conceptualizes health care as an arena for power contests among key stakeholders, drawing attention to the moves, countermoves, and alliances that have challenged physicians' dominance since the 1970s. Here, we focus on one of the lesser known micro-level consequences of such forces for physicians: emotional distress. We draw on 145 interviews with frontline physicians across four U.S. cities during the COVID-19 pandemic to trace physicians' experiences with three countervailing forces: the state, health care organizations, and patients. We find that threats to physician dominance eroded physicians' sense of mastery (perceived personal control) at work, thereby prompting emotional distress, including anger and moral conflict. Conversely, in certain cases, acts of resistance may have helped increase mastery, thus moderating distress. Our findings advance the countervailing powers framework by elucidating some of the micro-level, personal consequences of macro-level power struggles and offer practical implications for understanding contemporary threats to physician dominance.
需要应对的力量:COVID-19 期间的抗衡力量与医生的情绪困扰。
反制力量 "框架将医疗保健概念化为主要利益相关者之间的权力角逐舞台,提请人们注意自 20 世纪 70 年代以来挑战医生主导地位的各种行动、反行动和联盟。在此,我们将重点关注这些力量对医生造成的一个鲜为人知的微观后果:情绪困扰。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们对美国四个城市的一线医生进行了 145 次访谈,追溯了医生在国家、医疗机构和患者这三种对抗力量面前的经历。我们发现,对医生主导地位的威胁削弱了医生在工作中的主人翁意识(个人控制感),从而引发了情绪困扰,包括愤怒和道德冲突。相反,在某些情况下,抵制行为可能有助于增强主人翁意识,从而减轻痛苦。我们的研究结果通过阐明宏观层面权力斗争的一些微观个人后果,推进了反制权力框架,并为理解当代医生主导地位面临的威胁提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Health and Social Behavior is a medical sociology journal that publishes empirical and theoretical articles that apply sociological concepts and methods to the understanding of health and illness and the organization of medicine and health care. Its editorial policy favors manuscripts that are grounded in important theoretical issues in medical sociology or the sociology of mental health and that advance theoretical understanding of the processes by which social factors and human health are inter-related.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信