A perspective on neurodivergent-affirming relational practice: Exploration of identity and the healing process

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Samantha Fuld, M. R. McKelvie
{"title":"A perspective on neurodivergent-affirming relational practice: Exploration of identity and the healing process","authors":"Samantha Fuld,&nbsp;M. R. McKelvie","doi":"10.1002/capr.12792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This commentary examines the historic primacy of behavioural interventions in psychotherapeutic work with neurodivergent people. Such interventions have been increasingly criticised as failing to affirm aspects of neurodivergence as significant for one's identity and positive sense of self, instead emphasising conformity to socially and academically determined norms, which may not always be the goals of the individual engaging with therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Relational therapeutic interventions, which have not traditionally been centred in clinical approaches with this group of people, have great potential to address the inadequacies of more behaviourally oriented modalities as they were designed to address experiences of internalised stigma and invalidation, enhance a cohesive sense of self, affirm intersectional identity, tune into emotional experiences, and engage in healing through relationships and connection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>While further research is needed to support the efficacy of relational approaches in work alongside neurodivergent people, their application is promising and aligned with the expressed needs of this community.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This commentary examines the historic primacy of behavioural interventions in psychotherapeutic work with neurodivergent people. Such interventions have been increasingly criticised as failing to affirm aspects of neurodivergence as significant for one's identity and positive sense of self, instead emphasising conformity to socially and academically determined norms, which may not always be the goals of the individual engaging with therapy.

Findings

Relational therapeutic interventions, which have not traditionally been centred in clinical approaches with this group of people, have great potential to address the inadequacies of more behaviourally oriented modalities as they were designed to address experiences of internalised stigma and invalidation, enhance a cohesive sense of self, affirm intersectional identity, tune into emotional experiences, and engage in healing through relationships and connection.

Discussion

While further research is needed to support the efficacy of relational approaches in work alongside neurodivergent people, their application is promising and aligned with the expressed needs of this community.

从神经变异体肯定关系实践的角度:探索身份和治疗过程
背景 这篇评论探讨了行为干预在神经症患者心理治疗工作中的历史地位。这些干预措施受到越来越多的批评,认为它们未能肯定神经变异的某些方面对个人身份和积极的自我意识的重要意义,而是强调遵守社会和学术界确定的规范,而这些规范可能并不总是参与治疗的个人的目标。 研究结果 关系治疗干预在传统上并不是以这一群体为中心的临床方法,但却具有巨大的潜力,可以解决以行为为导向的治疗方法的不足之处,因为这些方法旨在解决内化的污名化和无效化体验,增强自我凝聚感,肯定交叉身份,调整情感体验,并通过关系和联系参与治疗。 讨论 虽然还需要进一步的研究来支持关系疗法在神经变异者工作中的有效性,但其应用前景广阔,且符合该群体所表达的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信