A comparison of the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and Beck cognitive therapy on the depression and anxiety of patients recovering from COVID-19: A pilot study

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Counselling & Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1002/capr.12811

Maryam Khajehnezhad, Sahar Khanjani Veshki

{"title":"A comparison of the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and Beck cognitive therapy on the depression and anxiety of patients recovering from COVID-19: A pilot study","authors":"Maryam Khajehnezhad, Sahar Khanjani Veshki","doi":"10.1002/capr.12811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Depression and anxiety are prevalent psychological symptoms among COVID-19 survivors. This study compared the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and Beck cognitive therapy (BCT) in addressing these issues.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-five COVID-19 survivors were randomly assigned to one of three groups: MBCT, BCT or a control. Pre- and postintervention assessments, using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), were conducted. Both interventions consisted of eight 90-minute sessions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>An ANCOVA analysis revealed that BCT was more effective than MBCT in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms. Both interventions led to significant improvements, but no significant differences were observed between post-test and follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>BCT is a promising intervention for depression and anxiety in COVID-19 survivors. Facilities providing cognitive therapy should be integrated into healthcare settings to support mental health recovery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"24 4","pages":"1649-1659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Depression and anxiety are prevalent psychological symptoms among COVID-19 survivors. This study compared the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and Beck cognitive therapy (BCT) in addressing these issues.

Methods

Forty-five COVID-19 survivors were randomly assigned to one of three groups: MBCT, BCT or a control. Pre- and postintervention assessments, using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), were conducted. Both interventions consisted of eight 90-minute sessions.

Results

An ANCOVA analysis revealed that BCT was more effective than MBCT in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms. Both interventions led to significant improvements, but no significant differences were observed between post-test and follow-up.

Conclusion

BCT is a promising intervention for depression and anxiety in COVID-19 survivors. Facilities providing cognitive therapy should be integrated into healthcare settings to support mental health recovery.

查看原文本刊更多论文

正念认知疗法与贝克认知疗法对 COVID-19 康复患者抑郁和焦虑的疗效比较：试点研究

背景抑郁和焦虑是 COVID-19 幸存者普遍存在的心理症状。本研究比较了正念认知疗法（MBCT）和贝克认知疗法（BCT）在解决这些问题方面的疗效。方法 45 名 COVID-19 幸存者被随机分配到三组中的一组：MBCT、BCT 或对照组。采用贝克焦虑量表（BAI）和贝克抑郁量表（BDI）进行干预前和干预后评估。两种干预方法都包括八个 90 分钟的疗程。结果方差分析显示，在减少抑郁和焦虑症状方面，BCT 比 MBCT 更有效。两种干预方法都有明显改善，但在测试后和随访期间没有观察到明显差异。结论 BCT 是一种治疗 COVID-19 幸存者抑郁和焦虑的有效干预方法。应将提供认知疗法的机构纳入医疗机构，以支持心理健康的恢复。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.