Does a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group reduce psychological distress for women in an acute psychiatric inpatient hospital? A service evaluation

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Emily Staite, Farah Francine
{"title":"Does a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group reduce psychological distress for women in an acute psychiatric inpatient hospital? A service evaluation","authors":"Emily Staite,&nbsp;Farah Francine","doi":"10.1002/capr.12812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is a limited amount of research assessing the effectiveness of group therapy on acute inpatient psychiatric wards, and mixed results from research assessing inpatient psychological therapies in general. Previous studies highlight challenges for conducting research on psychiatric inpatient hospitals, such as short admissions, high patient turnover, engagement challenges, acuteness of illness, overmedication and feelings of stigma and disempowerment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This service evaluation aims to assess whether weekly ward-based interpersonal group therapy reduces short-term psychological distress for women on an acute psychiatric inpatient ward in inner-city London (Tower Hamlets), UK.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This service evaluation compared psychological distress, as measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation 10 (CORE-10), pre- and post-intervention for women attending a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group between February 2023 and August 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 46 participants included in the analysis. There was an 11.3% decrease in the mean CORE-10 score post-intervention. Four (9%) patients exhibited significant and reliable change (i.e. short-term psychological distress reduced to a ‘healthy’ level). A further three (7%) patients exhibited no significant change. Short-term psychological distress did not significantly deteriorate for any patients who attended the ward-based interpersonal therapy group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>It is feasible to collect pre- and post-outcome data to assess psychological distress following a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group over a 6-month period, which meet acceptable a priori sample size calculations. The group appears to have an immediate positive impact for the majority (95%) of patients where short-term psychological distress reduced or stayed the same; however, this was only significant for 16% of patients. It would be important to collect qualitative data, ideally using multiple methods or data sources for triangulation, in order to corroborate and strengthen the current findings. Practitioners cannot rely solely on the results of this study to demonstrate effectiveness of psychotherapeutic group interventions in acute inpatient settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"24 4","pages":"1641-1648"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is a limited amount of research assessing the effectiveness of group therapy on acute inpatient psychiatric wards, and mixed results from research assessing inpatient psychological therapies in general. Previous studies highlight challenges for conducting research on psychiatric inpatient hospitals, such as short admissions, high patient turnover, engagement challenges, acuteness of illness, overmedication and feelings of stigma and disempowerment.

Aims

This service evaluation aims to assess whether weekly ward-based interpersonal group therapy reduces short-term psychological distress for women on an acute psychiatric inpatient ward in inner-city London (Tower Hamlets), UK.

Methods

This service evaluation compared psychological distress, as measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation 10 (CORE-10), pre- and post-intervention for women attending a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group between February 2023 and August 2023.

Results

There were 46 participants included in the analysis. There was an 11.3% decrease in the mean CORE-10 score post-intervention. Four (9%) patients exhibited significant and reliable change (i.e. short-term psychological distress reduced to a ‘healthy’ level). A further three (7%) patients exhibited no significant change. Short-term psychological distress did not significantly deteriorate for any patients who attended the ward-based interpersonal therapy group.

Conclusion

It is feasible to collect pre- and post-outcome data to assess psychological distress following a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group over a 6-month period, which meet acceptable a priori sample size calculations. The group appears to have an immediate positive impact for the majority (95%) of patients where short-term psychological distress reduced or stayed the same; however, this was only significant for 16% of patients. It would be important to collect qualitative data, ideally using multiple methods or data sources for triangulation, in order to corroborate and strengthen the current findings. Practitioners cannot rely solely on the results of this study to demonstrate effectiveness of psychotherapeutic group interventions in acute inpatient settings.

每周一次的病房人际治疗小组能否减轻急性精神病住院患者的心理压力?服务评估
研究背景 目前,对精神科急诊住院病人病房的团体治疗效果进行评估的研究数量有限,而对一般住院病人心理疗法进行评估的研究结果也不尽相同。以往的研究强调了在精神科住院病人医院开展研究所面临的挑战,如入院时间短、病人流动率高、参与挑战、疾病的严重性、过度医疗以及耻辱感和无力感。 目的 本服务评估旨在评估每周一次的病房人际小组疗法是否能减轻英国伦敦内城(哈姆雷特塔)急性精神病住院病房女性患者的短期心理压力。 方法 该服务评估比较了 2023 年 2 月至 2023 年 8 月期间参加每周病房人际治疗小组的女性在干预前和干预后的心理压力,心理压力由常规评估临床结果 10(CORE-10)进行测量。 结果 46 名参与者参与了分析。干预后,CORE-10 平均得分下降了 11.3%。四名患者(9%)表现出了显著而可靠的变化(即短期心理困扰降至 "健康 "水平)。另有三名患者(7%)没有明显变化。参加病房人际治疗小组的所有患者的短期心理压力都没有明显恶化。 结论 在为期 6 个月的每周一次病房人际治疗小组活动中,收集活动前后的结果数据以评估心理困扰是可行的,而且符合可接受的先验样本量计算方法。该小组似乎对大多数患者(95%)产生了立竿见影的积极影响,他们的短期心理压力有所减轻或保持不变;然而,只有 16% 的患者的心理压力显著减轻。收集定性数据非常重要,最好使用多种方法或数据源进行三角测量,以证实和加强目前的研究结果。从业人员不能仅仅依靠本研究的结果来证明心理治疗小组干预在急诊住院患者中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信