Comparison Between UKF and EKF in Sensorless Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives

IF 5 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Saverio Rigon;Benedikt Haus;Paolo Mercorelli;Mauro Zigliotto
{"title":"Comparison Between UKF and EKF in Sensorless Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives","authors":"Saverio Rigon;Benedikt Haus;Paolo Mercorelli;Mauro Zigliotto","doi":"10.1109/OJPEL.2024.3469533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reduction of the human environmental footprint can be achieved through the use of more efficient motors, such as synchronous reluctance motors (SynRMs). Known for their affordability, SynRMs are increasingly employed in sensorless AC drives. This paper presents a critical comparison of sensorless algorithms based on two nonlinear Kalman Filters (Unscented and Extended). The objective is to highlight the theoretical and practical advantages and drawbacks of each method when applied to the speed control of a SynRM, culminating in a definitive decision on the best choice. The magnetic model of the SynRM is much more nonlinear than that of induction motors, which are predominantly addressed in existing literature. This study aims to fill the gap by answering the question: “Is the extended Kalman filter still the best choice even in the case of nonlinear electric motors?” The answer comes through a large batch of experiments, including speed and load torque tests, zero-speed standstill starts, parameter sensitivity, and evaluation of computational burdens for both Kalman filter algorithms.","PeriodicalId":93182,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of power electronics","volume":"5 ","pages":"1562-1572"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10696945","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of power electronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10696945/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reduction of the human environmental footprint can be achieved through the use of more efficient motors, such as synchronous reluctance motors (SynRMs). Known for their affordability, SynRMs are increasingly employed in sensorless AC drives. This paper presents a critical comparison of sensorless algorithms based on two nonlinear Kalman Filters (Unscented and Extended). The objective is to highlight the theoretical and practical advantages and drawbacks of each method when applied to the speed control of a SynRM, culminating in a definitive decision on the best choice. The magnetic model of the SynRM is much more nonlinear than that of induction motors, which are predominantly addressed in existing literature. This study aims to fill the gap by answering the question: “Is the extended Kalman filter still the best choice even in the case of nonlinear electric motors?” The answer comes through a large batch of experiments, including speed and load torque tests, zero-speed standstill starts, parameter sensitivity, and evaluation of computational burdens for both Kalman filter algorithms.
无传感器同步磁阻电机驱动器中 UKF 和 EKF 的比较
通过使用更高效的电机,如同步磁阻电机(SynRM),可以减少人类对环境的影响。同步磁阻电机以经济实惠著称,越来越多地应用于无传感器交流驱动器。本文对基于两种非线性卡尔曼滤波器(无符号卡尔曼滤波器和扩展卡尔曼滤波器)的无传感器算法进行了重要比较。目的是强调每种方法在应用于 SynRM 速度控制时的理论和实际优缺点,最终确定最佳选择。SynRM 的磁场模型比感应电机的磁场模型非线性得多,而现有文献主要涉及感应电机的磁场模型。本研究旨在通过回答以下问题来填补这一空白:"即使在非线性电机的情况下,扩展卡尔曼滤波器仍然是最佳选择吗?答案来自大量实验,包括转速和负载转矩测试、零速静止启动、参数灵敏度以及两种卡尔曼滤波算法的计算负担评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信