Mindfulness-based intervention for non-farmacological pain control after Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Lorenzo Impieri , Giacomo Mazzoli , Andrea Pezzi , Giuseppe M. Peretti , Laura Mangiavini , Nicolò Rossi
{"title":"Mindfulness-based intervention for non-farmacological pain control after Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Lorenzo Impieri ,&nbsp;Giacomo Mazzoli ,&nbsp;Andrea Pezzi ,&nbsp;Giuseppe M. Peretti ,&nbsp;Laura Mangiavini ,&nbsp;Nicolò Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pain control after Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty (THA and TKA) mainly relies on medications including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioid medications. Despite generally positive outcomes, a substantial subset of patients experiences chronic post-surgical pain and dissatisfaction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing THA and TKA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, including manual searches. The eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed explicit MBIs on postoperative pain in THA or TKA patients, with outcomes including pain intensity, opioid use, and physical function. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed on the studies included in the review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 324 unique results, 5 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 778 patients. The interventions varied from single-session mindfulness practices to multi-week courses. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in standardized pain scores (Hedge’s g −1.83, 95%CI: −2.70; −0.96, p = 0.002) for MBI groups compared to controls, with high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 80.0 %). Influence analysis indicated no single study disproportionately influenced the results. The Correlated and Hierarchical Effects (CHE) model confirmed the robustness of these findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MBIs are associated with a significant reduction in postoperative pain following THA and TKA, representing a viable non-pharmacological option for pain management. Further research should focus on optimizing the timing and delivery of these interventions to enhance their efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pain control after Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty (THA and TKA) mainly relies on medications including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioid medications. Despite generally positive outcomes, a substantial subset of patients experiences chronic post-surgical pain and dissatisfaction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing THA and TKA.

Methods

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, including manual searches. The eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed explicit MBIs on postoperative pain in THA or TKA patients, with outcomes including pain intensity, opioid use, and physical function. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed on the studies included in the review.

Results

Out of 324 unique results, 5 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 778 patients. The interventions varied from single-session mindfulness practices to multi-week courses. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in standardized pain scores (Hedge’s g −1.83, 95%CI: −2.70; −0.96, p = 0.002) for MBI groups compared to controls, with high heterogeneity (I2 = 80.0 %). Influence analysis indicated no single study disproportionately influenced the results. The Correlated and Hierarchical Effects (CHE) model confirmed the robustness of these findings.

Conclusions

MBIs are associated with a significant reduction in postoperative pain following THA and TKA, representing a viable non-pharmacological option for pain management. Further research should focus on optimizing the timing and delivery of these interventions to enhance their efficacy.
对全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后非药物疼痛控制的正念干预:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景全髋关节和全膝关节置换术(THA 和 TKA)后的疼痛控制主要依靠药物,包括非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和阿片类药物。尽管疗效普遍良好,但仍有相当一部分患者在手术后长期感到疼痛和不满。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估正念干预(MBIs)在减轻接受 THA 和 TKA 手术患者术后疼痛方面的有效性。方法按照系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,包括人工检索。资格标准包括对 THA 或 TKA 患者术后疼痛进行明确 MBI 评估的随机对照试验 (RCT),结果包括疼痛强度、阿片类药物使用和身体功能。采用 RoB2 工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。对纳入综述的研究进行了荟萃分析。结果在 324 项独特的结果中,有 5 项 RCT 符合纳入标准,涉及 778 名患者。干预措施多种多样,有单次正念练习,也有为期多周的课程。荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,MBI 组的标准化疼痛评分显著降低(Hedge's g -1.83, 95%CI: -2.70; -0.96,p = 0.002),异质性较高(I2 = 80.0 %)。影响分析表明,没有任何一项研究对结果产生过大的影响。结论MBI可显著减轻THA和TKA术后疼痛,是一种可行的非药物止痛方法。进一步的研究应侧重于优化这些干预措施的时机和实施,以提高其疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信