Strategies for remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Nitu Gupta , Sandipan Banerjee , Apurba Koley , Parijat Bharali , Richik GhoshThakur , Raza Rafiqul Hoque , Srinivasan Balachandran
{"title":"Strategies for remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis","authors":"Nitu Gupta ,&nbsp;Sandipan Banerjee ,&nbsp;Apurba Koley ,&nbsp;Parijat Bharali ,&nbsp;Richik GhoshThakur ,&nbsp;Raza Rafiqul Hoque ,&nbsp;Srinivasan Balachandran","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are pervasive organic pollutants in the environment. PAHs originate from natural and anthropogenic sources, and are associated with incomplete combustion of organic matter. PAHs can pose a substantial health risk, including teratogenicity, immune suppression, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity. Several studies explored PAHs remediation using varied methods, each with merits and drawbacks. This review compiles diverse methods, offering an overview of multidimensional approaches for remediating PAH-contaminated soils, with a particular emphasis on hybrid technique. The exploration comprehends physical techniques like thermal desorption and electrokinetic remediation, chemical methods including oxidation and photocatalytic remediation, and biological approaches such as phytoremediation and microbial degradation. The integration of these diverse methods reflects a holistic and sustainable approach to address the challenges posed by PAHs-polluted sites. Phytoremediation is eco-sustainable, cost-effective, but time-consuming, while hybrid approaches offer enhanced PAH removal in short time. In comparison to microbial degradation and advanced computational methods, thermal and electrokinetic methods are costly and less eco-friendly. Research in PAHs remediation is increasingly leaning towards the following sequence: hybrid methods &lt; chemical/physical methods &lt; biological methods. Focusing on hybrid remediation, the physical-chemical methods hold the highest research prevalence at 53 %, followed by chemical-biological at 37 %, and the least in the physical-biological category at 10 %. This review advocates for hybrid remediation methods, which can serve as a bridge between environmental sustainability and remediation efficiency. Challenges remain in optimizing these technologies, ensuring economic feasibility, and connecting knowledge gaps. Future research may prioritize on remediation proficiency with innovation, and ensuring long-term environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 105688"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324004190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are pervasive organic pollutants in the environment. PAHs originate from natural and anthropogenic sources, and are associated with incomplete combustion of organic matter. PAHs can pose a substantial health risk, including teratogenicity, immune suppression, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity. Several studies explored PAHs remediation using varied methods, each with merits and drawbacks. This review compiles diverse methods, offering an overview of multidimensional approaches for remediating PAH-contaminated soils, with a particular emphasis on hybrid technique. The exploration comprehends physical techniques like thermal desorption and electrokinetic remediation, chemical methods including oxidation and photocatalytic remediation, and biological approaches such as phytoremediation and microbial degradation. The integration of these diverse methods reflects a holistic and sustainable approach to address the challenges posed by PAHs-polluted sites. Phytoremediation is eco-sustainable, cost-effective, but time-consuming, while hybrid approaches offer enhanced PAH removal in short time. In comparison to microbial degradation and advanced computational methods, thermal and electrokinetic methods are costly and less eco-friendly. Research in PAHs remediation is increasingly leaning towards the following sequence: hybrid methods < chemical/physical methods < biological methods. Focusing on hybrid remediation, the physical-chemical methods hold the highest research prevalence at 53 %, followed by chemical-biological at 37 %, and the least in the physical-biological category at 10 %. This review advocates for hybrid remediation methods, which can serve as a bridge between environmental sustainability and remediation efficiency. Challenges remain in optimizing these technologies, ensuring economic feasibility, and connecting knowledge gaps. Future research may prioritize on remediation proficiency with innovation, and ensuring long-term environmental sustainability.

Abstract Image

受污染土壤中多环芳烃的修复策略:系统综述和文献计量分析
多环芳烃(PAHs)是环境中普遍存在的有机污染物。PAHs 来源于自然和人为,与有机物的不完全燃烧有关。PAHs 可对健康造成严重危害,包括致畸、免疫抑制、诱变和致癌。一些研究采用不同的方法对 PAHs 进行修复,这些方法各有利弊。本综述汇编了各种方法,概述了多环芳烃污染土壤的多维修复方法,并特别强调了混合技术。文章探讨了热解吸和电动修复等物理技术、氧化和光催化修复等化学方法以及植物修复和微生物降解等生物方法。这些不同方法的整合体现了一种全面、可持续的方法来应对多环芳烃污染场地带来的挑战。植物修复具有生态可持续性、成本效益高但耗时长的特点,而混合方法可在短时间内提高多环芳烃的去除率。与微生物降解和先进的计算方法相比,热动力学和电动力学方法成本高且不太环保。多环芳烃修复研究越来越倾向于以下顺序:混合方法;化学/物理方法;生物方法。就混合修复而言,物理化学方法的研究普及率最高,为 53%;其次是化学生物方法,为 37%;物理生物方法的研究普及率最低,为 10%。本综述提倡采用混合修复方法,这种方法可以在环境可持续性和修复效率之间架起一座桥梁。在优化这些技术、确保经济可行性以及填补知识空白方面仍存在挑战。未来的研究可优先考虑具有创新性的修复能力,并确保环境的长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信