An assessment of photochemical carbon dioxide utilisation technologies using real options

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Michael P. Brandon , Mark Cummins , Peter Deeney , Mary T. Pryce
{"title":"An assessment of photochemical carbon dioxide utilisation technologies using real options","authors":"Michael P. Brandon ,&nbsp;Mark Cummins ,&nbsp;Peter Deeney ,&nbsp;Mary T. Pryce","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2024.103994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nascent carbon capture and utilisation technologies that transform captured <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>CO</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions into a usable chemical product, provide alternatives to carbon capture and storage. Technology risk, and associated investment uncertainty, are barriers to the development of such technologies. In view of this, we consider a flexible real options framework to assess the technology risk inherent in photochemical carbon dioxide reduction technologies, a low readiness level technology (TRL 2–4) that utilises an artificial photosynthesis system based on natural or artificial light. We consider two competing configurations, both of which produce carbon monoxide but differ in the light source for the artificial photosynthesis system. One configuration uses intense UV lamps, while the other uses ambient light with a solar concentrator. After establishing literature informed cost estimates for pilot plant specifications, we conduct a sensitivity analysis across select physical attributes, technological development characteristics and price exposures. We confirm high sensitivity to the efficiency of the CO production process. Cost sensitivities are also evidenced for the catalyst, the running of the UV lamps in the first configuration and the solar concentrator in the second configuration. Price sensitivity is highest for the CO produced. Our study is relevant for project developers considering investment in research for this nascent technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 103994"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138824003904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nascent carbon capture and utilisation technologies that transform captured CO2 emissions into a usable chemical product, provide alternatives to carbon capture and storage. Technology risk, and associated investment uncertainty, are barriers to the development of such technologies. In view of this, we consider a flexible real options framework to assess the technology risk inherent in photochemical carbon dioxide reduction technologies, a low readiness level technology (TRL 2–4) that utilises an artificial photosynthesis system based on natural or artificial light. We consider two competing configurations, both of which produce carbon monoxide but differ in the light source for the artificial photosynthesis system. One configuration uses intense UV lamps, while the other uses ambient light with a solar concentrator. After establishing literature informed cost estimates for pilot plant specifications, we conduct a sensitivity analysis across select physical attributes, technological development characteristics and price exposures. We confirm high sensitivity to the efficiency of the CO production process. Cost sensitivities are also evidenced for the catalyst, the running of the UV lamps in the first configuration and the solar concentrator in the second configuration. Price sensitivity is highest for the CO produced. Our study is relevant for project developers considering investment in research for this nascent technology.

Abstract Image

利用实际备选方案评估二氧化碳光化学利用技术
新兴的碳捕集与利用技术可将捕集到的二氧化碳排放转化为可用的化学产品,为碳捕集与封存提供了替代方案。技术风险和相关投资的不确定性是开发此类技术的障碍。有鉴于此,我们考虑采用灵活的实际选择框架来评估光化学二氧化碳减排技术的固有技术风险,该技术是一种低准备水平技术(TRL 2-4),利用基于自然光或人造光的人工光合作用系统。我们考虑了两种相互竞争的配置,它们都能产生一氧化碳,但人工光合作用系统的光源不同。一种配置使用强紫外线灯,而另一种配置则使用带有太阳能聚光器的环境光。在确定了试验工厂规格的文献成本估算后,我们对选定的物理属性、技术发展特征和价格风险进行了敏感性分析。我们证实了二氧化碳生产工艺效率的高度敏感性。成本敏感性还体现在催化剂、第一种配置中紫外线灯的运行和第二种配置中太阳能聚光器的运行上。二氧化碳生产的价格敏感性最高。我们的研究对项目开发人员考虑投资研究这项新兴技术具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信