The Unseen Truth of God in Early Modern Masterpieces

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arts Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.3390/arts13050158
Simon Abrahams
{"title":"The Unseen Truth of God in Early Modern Masterpieces","authors":"Simon Abrahams","doi":"10.3390/arts13050158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"God the Father was considered so completely inexpressible and unembodied that his visual appearance in early modern masterpieces has long challenged the theological accuracy of such works. A recent discovery complicates that issue. Albrecht Dürer’s 1500 Self-portrait as Christ is incorrectly considered an isolated example of divine self-representation. It was, in fact, as shown here, part of a long tradition throughout Europe between at least the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries. The praxis, potentially sacrilegious, raises questions about the truth of art at its highest level. To address this conundrum, this article analyzes works by three eminent, but very different, artists: Michelangelo, Raphael, and Dürer. Two current methodologies—visual exegesis and the poetics of making—support the argument. The analysis reveals that there is a fundamental unity to their work, which has not been recognized on account of three popular misconceptions about the nature of art, divinity, and the mind. This article concludes that depictions of God the Father and Christ by these artists are neither heretical nor false because, as the evidence shows, all three were part of a continuous spiritual tradition embedded within their craft.","PeriodicalId":30547,"journal":{"name":"Arts","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13050158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

God the Father was considered so completely inexpressible and unembodied that his visual appearance in early modern masterpieces has long challenged the theological accuracy of such works. A recent discovery complicates that issue. Albrecht Dürer’s 1500 Self-portrait as Christ is incorrectly considered an isolated example of divine self-representation. It was, in fact, as shown here, part of a long tradition throughout Europe between at least the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries. The praxis, potentially sacrilegious, raises questions about the truth of art at its highest level. To address this conundrum, this article analyzes works by three eminent, but very different, artists: Michelangelo, Raphael, and Dürer. Two current methodologies—visual exegesis and the poetics of making—support the argument. The analysis reveals that there is a fundamental unity to their work, which has not been recognized on account of three popular misconceptions about the nature of art, divinity, and the mind. This article concludes that depictions of God the Father and Christ by these artists are neither heretical nor false because, as the evidence shows, all three were part of a continuous spiritual tradition embedded within their craft.
早期现代杰作中看不见的上帝真理
父神被认为是完全不可表达和不具形体的,以至于他在早期现代杰作中的视觉形象长期以来一直对这些作品的神学准确性提出质疑。最近的一项发现使这一问题变得更加复杂。阿尔布雷希特-丢勒(Albrecht Dürer)的 1500 幅《基督自画像》(Self-portrait as Christ)被错误地认为是神性自画像的孤例。事实上,如图所示,至少在 15 至 17 世纪期间,它是整个欧洲长期传统的一部分。这种做法可能是亵渎神灵的,它引发了人们对艺术最高境界的真实性的质疑。为了解决这一难题,本文分析了三位杰出但截然不同的艺术家的作品:米开朗基罗、拉斐尔和丢勒。当前的两种方法论--视觉注释学和制作诗学--为论点提供了支持。分析表明,他们的作品具有根本的统一性,但由于人们对艺术、神性和心灵的本质存在三种误解,这种统一性一直未得到承认。本文的结论是,这些艺术家对父神和基督的描绘既不是异端也不是虚假的,因为正如证据所显示的那样,他们三人都是蕴含在其工艺中的连续精神传统的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts
Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信