Antipsychotic Drugs and Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lena Feber,Natalie L Peter,Virginia Chiocchia,Johannes Schneider-Thoma,Spyridon Siafis,Irene Bighelli,Wulf-Peter Hansen,Xiao Lin,Daniel Prates-Baldez,Georgia Salanti,Richard S E Keefe,Rolf R Engel,Stefan Leucht
{"title":"Antipsychotic Drugs and Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lena Feber,Natalie L Peter,Virginia Chiocchia,Johannes Schneider-Thoma,Spyridon Siafis,Irene Bighelli,Wulf-Peter Hansen,Xiao Lin,Daniel Prates-Baldez,Georgia Salanti,Richard S E Keefe,Rolf R Engel,Stefan Leucht","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nCognitive deficits are a substantial part of the symptoms of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and contribute heavily to the burden of disease. Antipsychotic drugs are not cognitive enhancers, but due to their different receptor-binding profiles, they could differ in their effects on cognition. No previous network meta-analysis compared antipsychotics to placebo, which is important to determine whether use of these drugs is associated with cognitive performance in SSDs at all.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo determine the association of treatment with various antipsychotics and cognition in patients with SSDs.\r\n\r\nData Sources\r\nCochrane Schizophrenia Trials Register through June 25, 2023.\r\n\r\nStudy Selection\r\nRandomized clinical trials examining the effects on cognition of antipsychotic drugs or placebo in participants with SSD.\r\n\r\nData Extraction and Synthesis\r\nA systematic review and random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-Network Meta-analysis reporting guideline.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nThe primary outcome was change in overall cognition score calculated for each study. Secondary outcomes included cognitive domains, quality of life, and functioning.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nThis study included 68 studies involving 9525 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.1 [8.9] years; 5878 male [70%] and 2890 [30%] female; some studies did not provide this information). There were few clear differences between antipsychotics, but first-generation dopamine antagonists haloperidol (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.04; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.33) and fluphenazine (SMD, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.39 to 0.69) as well as clozapine (SMD, 0.12; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.48) ranked low. No individual antipsychotic was associated with a clearly better outcome than placebo, but antipsychotics as a group were, with small effect sizes (mean SMDs: adrenergic/low dopamine, 0.21; serotonergic/dopaminergic, 0.26; muscarinic, 0.28; dopaminergic, 0.40).\r\n\r\nConclusion and Relevance\r\nAlthough data are relatively sparse, those reviewed in this study suggest that first-generation dopamine antagonists and clozapine should be avoided when cognitive deficits are a concern. Antipsychotics are not procognitive drugs. The overall small superior outcomes compared to placebo may be explained by less disordered thought patterns associated with fewer positive symptoms rather than cognitive deficits in the proper sense. The findings also suggest that harmonizing measurement of cognitive function in randomized clinical trials would be beneficial.","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2890","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Cognitive deficits are a substantial part of the symptoms of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and contribute heavily to the burden of disease. Antipsychotic drugs are not cognitive enhancers, but due to their different receptor-binding profiles, they could differ in their effects on cognition. No previous network meta-analysis compared antipsychotics to placebo, which is important to determine whether use of these drugs is associated with cognitive performance in SSDs at all. Objective To determine the association of treatment with various antipsychotics and cognition in patients with SSDs. Data Sources Cochrane Schizophrenia Trials Register through June 25, 2023. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials examining the effects on cognition of antipsychotic drugs or placebo in participants with SSD. Data Extraction and Synthesis A systematic review and random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-Network Meta-analysis reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was change in overall cognition score calculated for each study. Secondary outcomes included cognitive domains, quality of life, and functioning. Results This study included 68 studies involving 9525 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.1 [8.9] years; 5878 male [70%] and 2890 [30%] female; some studies did not provide this information). There were few clear differences between antipsychotics, but first-generation dopamine antagonists haloperidol (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.04; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.33) and fluphenazine (SMD, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.39 to 0.69) as well as clozapine (SMD, 0.12; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.48) ranked low. No individual antipsychotic was associated with a clearly better outcome than placebo, but antipsychotics as a group were, with small effect sizes (mean SMDs: adrenergic/low dopamine, 0.21; serotonergic/dopaminergic, 0.26; muscarinic, 0.28; dopaminergic, 0.40). Conclusion and Relevance Although data are relatively sparse, those reviewed in this study suggest that first-generation dopamine antagonists and clozapine should be avoided when cognitive deficits are a concern. Antipsychotics are not procognitive drugs. The overall small superior outcomes compared to placebo may be explained by less disordered thought patterns associated with fewer positive symptoms rather than cognitive deficits in the proper sense. The findings also suggest that harmonizing measurement of cognitive function in randomized clinical trials would be beneficial.
抗精神病药物与认知功能:系统回顾与配对网络元分析》(A Systematic Review and Pairwise Network Meta-Analysis)。
重要性认知障碍是精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)症状的重要组成部分,也是造成疾病负担的重要原因。抗精神病药物不是认知增强剂,但由于其受体结合特征不同,它们对认知的影响也可能不同。此前没有任何网络荟萃分析将抗精神病药物与安慰剂进行比较,而这对于确定这些药物的使用是否与SSD患者的认知能力有关联非常重要。研究选择考察抗精神病药物或安慰剂对 SSD 参与者认知能力影响的随机临床试验。数据提取和合成根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目--网络元分析报告指南》进行了系统综述和随机效应频数网络元分析。主要结果和测量指标主要结果是每项研究计算的总体认知能力评分变化。结果本研究共纳入 68 项研究,涉及 9525 名参与者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 35.1 [8.9] 岁;5878 名男性 [70%] 和 2890 名女性 [30%];部分研究未提供相关信息)。抗精神病药物之间几乎没有明显差异,但第一代多巴胺拮抗剂氟哌啶醇(标准化平均差 [SMD],0.04;95% CI,-0.25 至 0.33)和氟奋乃静(SMD,0.15;95% CI,-0.39 至 0.69)以及氯氮平(SMD,0.12;95% CI,-0.23 至 0.48)的差异较小。没有一种抗精神病药物的疗效明显优于安慰剂,但抗精神病药物作为一个群体,其效应大小较小(平均 SMD:肾上腺素能/低多巴胺能,0.21;5-羟色胺能/多巴胺能,0.26;毒蕈碱能,0.结论和相关性虽然数据相对稀少,但本研究中回顾的数据表明,当认知障碍是一个问题时,应避免使用第一代多巴胺拮抗剂和氯氮平。抗精神病药物并不是促认知药物。与安慰剂相比,总体疗效略胜一筹的原因可能是与较少的阳性症状相关的思维模式紊乱较少,而非正常意义上的认知障碍。研究结果还表明,在随机临床试验中统一认知功能的测量方法将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信