Reducing Learning and Psychosocial Disparities in Latino Children with Cancer: A Randomized Intervention Trial.

Sunita K Patel,Seong-Hyeon Kim,Kathleen Ingman,Van Huynh,Heather Huszti,Kimberly Kayser,Grace Mucci,Melissa Balderrama,Laura Bava,Abigail Onderwyzer Gold,Alicia Wuth,Nicole Delgado,Alysia Bosworth,Emily Nishimura,Harneet Hara,Anna Pawlowska,Lisa Mueller,F Lennie Wong
{"title":"Reducing Learning and Psychosocial Disparities in Latino Children with Cancer: A Randomized Intervention Trial.","authors":"Sunita K Patel,Seong-Hyeon Kim,Kathleen Ingman,Van Huynh,Heather Huszti,Kimberly Kayser,Grace Mucci,Melissa Balderrama,Laura Bava,Abigail Onderwyzer Gold,Alicia Wuth,Nicole Delgado,Alysia Bosworth,Emily Nishimura,Harneet Hara,Anna Pawlowska,Lisa Mueller,F Lennie Wong","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWe developed a high-intensity parenting intervention (HIP) to help parents support the academic success of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), who often face post-treatment challenges affecting their school-related functioning. This randomized controlled trial (NCT03178617) evaluated HIP's efficacy compared to lower-intensity, single-session, treatment-as-usual services (LIP) in Latino families. Primary outcomes were parenting efficacy and CCSs' school functioning; secondary outcomes included parenting knowledge and measures of CCSs' academic performance, attention, and functioning outside of school.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\n106 Latino survivors of childhood leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma (aged 6-12 years) and their parents were randomly assigned to HIP (n = 54) or LIP (n = 52). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated group differences across baseline, 6-month (T2), and 12-month (T3) assessments.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nParenting efficacy and knowledge improved significantly in the HIP arm, resulting in higher scores vs LIP at T2 and T3 (P ≤ .01). No significant between-group differences were found in child school functioning; however, HIP children showed significantly better social functioning and performance on one measure of attention (CPT-3 commissions) at T3 (P < .05). While HIP adherence challenges were observed, with only 33 (61%) completing the intervention, exploratory analyses suggest that benefits were most evident among those who fully engaged. Satisfaction and perceived benefit were greater for HIP vs LIP at both time points (P < .05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur results suggest the potential value of parent-directed behavioral interventions like HIP for CCSs and their families. Further studies are needed to address participation barriers and enhance engagement to maximize and sustain benefits.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND We developed a high-intensity parenting intervention (HIP) to help parents support the academic success of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), who often face post-treatment challenges affecting their school-related functioning. This randomized controlled trial (NCT03178617) evaluated HIP's efficacy compared to lower-intensity, single-session, treatment-as-usual services (LIP) in Latino families. Primary outcomes were parenting efficacy and CCSs' school functioning; secondary outcomes included parenting knowledge and measures of CCSs' academic performance, attention, and functioning outside of school. METHODS 106 Latino survivors of childhood leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma (aged 6-12 years) and their parents were randomly assigned to HIP (n = 54) or LIP (n = 52). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated group differences across baseline, 6-month (T2), and 12-month (T3) assessments. RESULTS Parenting efficacy and knowledge improved significantly in the HIP arm, resulting in higher scores vs LIP at T2 and T3 (P ≤ .01). No significant between-group differences were found in child school functioning; however, HIP children showed significantly better social functioning and performance on one measure of attention (CPT-3 commissions) at T3 (P < .05). While HIP adherence challenges were observed, with only 33 (61%) completing the intervention, exploratory analyses suggest that benefits were most evident among those who fully engaged. Satisfaction and perceived benefit were greater for HIP vs LIP at both time points (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest the potential value of parent-directed behavioral interventions like HIP for CCSs and their families. Further studies are needed to address participation barriers and enhance engagement to maximize and sustain benefits.
减少拉丁裔癌症儿童的学习和心理社会差异:随机干预试验。
背景我们开发了一种高强度父母教育干预(HIP),以帮助父母支持儿童癌症幸存者(CCSs)在学业上取得成功。这项随机对照试验(NCT03178617)评估了 HIP 在拉丁裔家庭中与强度较低、单次疗程、照常治疗服务(LIP)相比的疗效。主要结果是养育效果和儿童白血病患者的学校功能;次要结果包括养育知识以及儿童白血病患者的学业成绩、注意力和校外功能。线性混合效应模型评估了各组在基线、6 个月(T2)和 12 个月(T3)评估中的差异。结果HIP 组的育儿效果和知识显著提高,因此在 T2 和 T3 分数高于 LIP 组(P ≤ .01)。在儿童的学校功能方面,没有发现明显的组间差异;但是,HIP 儿童在 T3 阶段的社会功能和一项注意力测量(CPT-3 委员会)上的表现明显更好(P < .05)。虽然在坚持 HIP 的过程中遇到了挑战,只有 33 人(61%)完成了干预,但探索性分析表明,完全参与干预的儿童获益最明显。在两个时间点上,HIP 与 LIP 相比,满意度和感知到的益处更高(P < .05)。还需要进一步的研究来解决参与障碍和提高参与度,以最大限度地提高和保持收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信