{"title":"Reducing Learning and Psychosocial Disparities in Latino Children with Cancer: A Randomized Intervention Trial.","authors":"Sunita K Patel,Seong-Hyeon Kim,Kathleen Ingman,Van Huynh,Heather Huszti,Kimberly Kayser,Grace Mucci,Melissa Balderrama,Laura Bava,Abigail Onderwyzer Gold,Alicia Wuth,Nicole Delgado,Alysia Bosworth,Emily Nishimura,Harneet Hara,Anna Pawlowska,Lisa Mueller,F Lennie Wong","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWe developed a high-intensity parenting intervention (HIP) to help parents support the academic success of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), who often face post-treatment challenges affecting their school-related functioning. This randomized controlled trial (NCT03178617) evaluated HIP's efficacy compared to lower-intensity, single-session, treatment-as-usual services (LIP) in Latino families. Primary outcomes were parenting efficacy and CCSs' school functioning; secondary outcomes included parenting knowledge and measures of CCSs' academic performance, attention, and functioning outside of school.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\n106 Latino survivors of childhood leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma (aged 6-12 years) and their parents were randomly assigned to HIP (n = 54) or LIP (n = 52). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated group differences across baseline, 6-month (T2), and 12-month (T3) assessments.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nParenting efficacy and knowledge improved significantly in the HIP arm, resulting in higher scores vs LIP at T2 and T3 (P ≤ .01). No significant between-group differences were found in child school functioning; however, HIP children showed significantly better social functioning and performance on one measure of attention (CPT-3 commissions) at T3 (P < .05). While HIP adherence challenges were observed, with only 33 (61%) completing the intervention, exploratory analyses suggest that benefits were most evident among those who fully engaged. Satisfaction and perceived benefit were greater for HIP vs LIP at both time points (P < .05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur results suggest the potential value of parent-directed behavioral interventions like HIP for CCSs and their families. Further studies are needed to address participation barriers and enhance engagement to maximize and sustain benefits.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
We developed a high-intensity parenting intervention (HIP) to help parents support the academic success of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), who often face post-treatment challenges affecting their school-related functioning. This randomized controlled trial (NCT03178617) evaluated HIP's efficacy compared to lower-intensity, single-session, treatment-as-usual services (LIP) in Latino families. Primary outcomes were parenting efficacy and CCSs' school functioning; secondary outcomes included parenting knowledge and measures of CCSs' academic performance, attention, and functioning outside of school.
METHODS
106 Latino survivors of childhood leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma (aged 6-12 years) and their parents were randomly assigned to HIP (n = 54) or LIP (n = 52). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated group differences across baseline, 6-month (T2), and 12-month (T3) assessments.
RESULTS
Parenting efficacy and knowledge improved significantly in the HIP arm, resulting in higher scores vs LIP at T2 and T3 (P ≤ .01). No significant between-group differences were found in child school functioning; however, HIP children showed significantly better social functioning and performance on one measure of attention (CPT-3 commissions) at T3 (P < .05). While HIP adherence challenges were observed, with only 33 (61%) completing the intervention, exploratory analyses suggest that benefits were most evident among those who fully engaged. Satisfaction and perceived benefit were greater for HIP vs LIP at both time points (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest the potential value of parent-directed behavioral interventions like HIP for CCSs and their families. Further studies are needed to address participation barriers and enhance engagement to maximize and sustain benefits.