Transmitral Pressure Gradients in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation After Robotic Mitral Valve Repair With Leaflet Preservation Techniques

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Madison I. Goldberger, Angela Pollak, Matthew Fuller, Katherine Sun, Fawaz Alenezi, Donald Glower, Alina Nicoara
{"title":"Transmitral Pressure Gradients in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation After Robotic Mitral Valve Repair With Leaflet Preservation Techniques","authors":"Madison I. Goldberger,&nbsp;Angela Pollak,&nbsp;Matthew Fuller,&nbsp;Katherine Sun,&nbsp;Fawaz Alenezi,&nbsp;Donald Glower,&nbsp;Alina Nicoara","doi":"10.1111/echo.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The hemodynamic effects of mitral valve repair (MVr) with respect to transmitral pressure gradients (TMPGs) have not been described well in patients undergoing leaflet preservation techniques. In a population of patients undergoing robotic MVr with leaflet preservation, we investigate the expected change of the postrepair intraoperative TMPG in the postoperative follow-up period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively studied 144 adult patients who underwent robotic MVr. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and echocardiographic data were collected and analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found a slight increase in the mean TMPG from the intraoperative postrepair to the immediate postoperative period (intraoperative 3.3 ± 1.4 mmHg vs. first postoperative transthoracic echocardiography [TTE] follow-up 3.6 ± 1.9 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.016) with a gradual decline in the long-term follow-up (mean TMPG at last follow-up TTE 2.4+2.1 mmHg). When dichotomizing the patient population using a cutoff of 3 mmHg for the intraoperative mean TMPG, patients with an intraoperative mean TMPG &gt; 3 mmHg had higher mean TMPG gradients at first TTE (4.5 ± 2.4 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3 mmHg, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) as well as at last TTE (3.0± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.01) when compared with patients with an intraoperative mean TMPG ≤ 3 mmHg. There was no difference in clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although the hemodynamic effect of MVr seems to be small, patients with an intraoperative TMPG &gt; 3 mmHg have a higher mean TMPG at follow-up. The hemodynamic effect does not seem to have an impact on clinical outcome.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"41 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The hemodynamic effects of mitral valve repair (MVr) with respect to transmitral pressure gradients (TMPGs) have not been described well in patients undergoing leaflet preservation techniques. In a population of patients undergoing robotic MVr with leaflet preservation, we investigate the expected change of the postrepair intraoperative TMPG in the postoperative follow-up period.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 144 adult patients who underwent robotic MVr. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and echocardiographic data were collected and analyzed.

Results

We found a slight increase in the mean TMPG from the intraoperative postrepair to the immediate postoperative period (intraoperative 3.3 ± 1.4 mmHg vs. first postoperative transthoracic echocardiography [TTE] follow-up 3.6 ± 1.9 mmHg, p = 0.016) with a gradual decline in the long-term follow-up (mean TMPG at last follow-up TTE 2.4+2.1 mmHg). When dichotomizing the patient population using a cutoff of 3 mmHg for the intraoperative mean TMPG, patients with an intraoperative mean TMPG > 3 mmHg had higher mean TMPG gradients at first TTE (4.5 ± 2.4 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3 mmHg, p < 0.001) as well as at last TTE (3.0± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 mmHg, p = 0.01) when compared with patients with an intraoperative mean TMPG ≤ 3 mmHg. There was no difference in clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Although the hemodynamic effect of MVr seems to be small, patients with an intraoperative TMPG > 3 mmHg have a higher mean TMPG at follow-up. The hemodynamic effect does not seem to have an impact on clinical outcome.

采用保留瓣叶技术进行机器人二尖瓣修复术后退行性二尖瓣反流患者的跨瓣膜压力梯度
导言:在接受瓣叶保留技术的患者中,二尖瓣修复术(MVr)对透瓣压力梯度(TMPGs)的血流动力学影响尚未得到很好的描述。在接受机器人二尖瓣置换术并保留瓣叶的患者中,我们研究了术后随访期间修复术中 TMPG 的预期变化。 方法 我们对 144 名接受机器人中风手术的成年患者进行了回顾性研究。收集并分析了人口统计学、临床、手术和超声心动图数据。 结果 我们发现,从术中修复后到术后近期,平均 TMPG 略有增加(术中 3.3 ± 1.4 mmHg vs. 术后首次经胸超声心动图 [TTE] 随访 3.6 ± 1.9 mmHg,p = 0.016),但在长期随访中逐渐下降(最后一次 TTE 随访时的平均 TMPG 为 2.4+2.1 mmHg)。当使用术中平均 TMPG 3 mmHg 临界值对患者人群进行二分时,术中平均 TMPG > 3 mmHg 的患者在首次 TTE 时的平均 TMPG 梯度更高(4.与术中平均 TMPG ≤ 3 mmHg 的患者相比,术中平均 TMPG ≥ 3 mmHg 的患者在第一次 TTE(4.5 ± 2.4 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3 mmHg,p = 0.001)和最后一次 TTE(3.0± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 mmHg,p = 0.01)时的平均 TMPG 梯度更高。临床结果无差异。 结论 虽然 MVr 对血液动力学的影响似乎很小,但术中 TMPG > 3 mmHg 的患者随访时平均 TMPG 较高。血液动力学效应似乎对临床结果没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信