Robert J. Roy, Muhammad A. Parvaz, Ken T. Wakabayashi, Robert J. R. Blair, Nicholas A. Hubbard
{"title":"Methamphetamine-related working memory difficulties underpinned by reduced frontoparietal responses","authors":"Robert J. Roy, Muhammad A. Parvaz, Ken T. Wakabayashi, Robert J. R. Blair, Nicholas A. Hubbard","doi":"10.1111/adb.13444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Working memory difficulties are common, debilitating, and may pose barriers to recovery for people who use methamphetamine. Yet, little is known regarding the neural dysfunctions accompanying these difficulties. Here, we acquired cross-sectional, functional magnetic resonance imaging while people with problematic methamphetamine-use experience (MA<sup>+</sup>, <i>n =</i> 65) and people without methamphetamine-use experience (MA<sup>−</sup>, <i>n =</i> 44) performed a parametric <i>n</i>-back task (0-back through 2-back). Performance on tasks administered outside of the scanner, together with <i>n</i>-back performance, afforded to determine a latent dimension of participants' working memory ability. Behavioural results indicated that MA<sup>+</sup> participants exhibited lower scores on this dimension compared to MA<sup>−</sup> participants (<i>d =</i> −1.39, <i>p</i> < .001). Whole-brain imaging results also revealed that MA<sup>+</sup> participants exhibited alterations in load-induced responses predominantly in frontoparietal and default-mode areas. Specifically, while the MA<sup>−</sup> group exhibited monotonic activation increases within frontoparietal areas and monotonic decreases within default-mode areas from 0-back to 2-back, MA<sup>+</sup> participants showed a relative attenuation of these load-induced activation patterns (<i>d</i> = −1.55, <i>p</i> < .001). Moreover, increased activations in frontoparietal areas from 0- to 2-back were related to greater working memory ability among MA<sup>+</sup> participants (<i>r</i> = .560, <i>p</i> = .004). No such effects were observed for default-mode areas. In sum, reductions in working memory ability were observed alongside load-induced dysfunctions in frontoparietal and default-mode areas for people with problematic methamphetamine-use experience. Among them, load-induced activations within frontoparietal areas were found to have a strong and specific relationship to individual differences in working memory ability, indicating a putative neural signature of the working memory difficulties associated with chronic methamphetamine use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7289,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Biology","volume":"29 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adb.13444","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adb.13444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Working memory difficulties are common, debilitating, and may pose barriers to recovery for people who use methamphetamine. Yet, little is known regarding the neural dysfunctions accompanying these difficulties. Here, we acquired cross-sectional, functional magnetic resonance imaging while people with problematic methamphetamine-use experience (MA+, n = 65) and people without methamphetamine-use experience (MA−, n = 44) performed a parametric n-back task (0-back through 2-back). Performance on tasks administered outside of the scanner, together with n-back performance, afforded to determine a latent dimension of participants' working memory ability. Behavioural results indicated that MA+ participants exhibited lower scores on this dimension compared to MA− participants (d = −1.39, p < .001). Whole-brain imaging results also revealed that MA+ participants exhibited alterations in load-induced responses predominantly in frontoparietal and default-mode areas. Specifically, while the MA− group exhibited monotonic activation increases within frontoparietal areas and monotonic decreases within default-mode areas from 0-back to 2-back, MA+ participants showed a relative attenuation of these load-induced activation patterns (d = −1.55, p < .001). Moreover, increased activations in frontoparietal areas from 0- to 2-back were related to greater working memory ability among MA+ participants (r = .560, p = .004). No such effects were observed for default-mode areas. In sum, reductions in working memory ability were observed alongside load-induced dysfunctions in frontoparietal and default-mode areas for people with problematic methamphetamine-use experience. Among them, load-induced activations within frontoparietal areas were found to have a strong and specific relationship to individual differences in working memory ability, indicating a putative neural signature of the working memory difficulties associated with chronic methamphetamine use.
期刊介绍:
Addiction Biology is focused on neuroscience contributions and it aims to advance our understanding of the action of drugs of abuse and addictive processes. Papers are accepted in both animal experimentation or clinical research. The content is geared towards behavioral, molecular, genetic, biochemical, neuro-biological and pharmacology aspects of these fields.
Addiction Biology includes peer-reviewed original research reports and reviews.
Addiction Biology is published on behalf of the Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and other Drugs (SSA). Members of the Society for the Study of Addiction receive the Journal as part of their annual membership subscription.