Multibody interactions between protein inclusions in the pointlike curvature model for tense and tensionless membranes

IF 1.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Jean-Baptiste Fournier
{"title":"Multibody interactions between protein inclusions in the pointlike curvature model for tense and tensionless membranes","authors":"Jean-Baptiste Fournier","doi":"10.1140/epje/s10189-024-00456-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pointlike curvature constraint (PCC) model and the disk detachment angle (DDA) model for the deformation-mediated interaction of conical integral protein inclusions in biomembranes are compared in the small deformation regime. Given the radius of membrane proteins, which is comparable to the membrane thickness, it is not obvious which of the two models should be considered the most adequate. For two proteins in a tensionless membranes, the PCC and DDA models coincide at the leading-order <span>\\(\\sim r^{-4}\\)</span> in their separation but differ at the next order. Yet, for distances larger than twice the proteins diameter, the difference is less than <span>\\(10\\%\\)</span>. Like the DDA model, the PCC model includes all multibody interactions in a non-approximate way. The asymptotic <span>\\(\\sim r^{-4}\\)</span> many-body energy of triangular and square protein clusters is exactly the same in both models. Pentagonal clusters, however, behave differently; they have a vanishing energy in the PCC model, while they have a non-vanishing weaker <span>\\(\\sim r^{-6}\\)</span> asymptotic power law in the DDA model. We quantify the importance of multibody interactions in small polygonal clusters of three, four and five inclusions with identical or opposite curvatures in tensionless or tense membranes. We find that the pairwise approximation is almost always very poor. At short separation, the three-body interaction is not sufficient to account for the full many-body interaction. This is confirmed by equilibrium Monte Carlo simulations of up to ten inclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":790,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal E","volume":"47 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal E","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epje/s10189-024-00456-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pointlike curvature constraint (PCC) model and the disk detachment angle (DDA) model for the deformation-mediated interaction of conical integral protein inclusions in biomembranes are compared in the small deformation regime. Given the radius of membrane proteins, which is comparable to the membrane thickness, it is not obvious which of the two models should be considered the most adequate. For two proteins in a tensionless membranes, the PCC and DDA models coincide at the leading-order \(\sim r^{-4}\) in their separation but differ at the next order. Yet, for distances larger than twice the proteins diameter, the difference is less than \(10\%\). Like the DDA model, the PCC model includes all multibody interactions in a non-approximate way. The asymptotic \(\sim r^{-4}\) many-body energy of triangular and square protein clusters is exactly the same in both models. Pentagonal clusters, however, behave differently; they have a vanishing energy in the PCC model, while they have a non-vanishing weaker \(\sim r^{-6}\) asymptotic power law in the DDA model. We quantify the importance of multibody interactions in small polygonal clusters of three, four and five inclusions with identical or opposite curvatures in tensionless or tense membranes. We find that the pairwise approximation is almost always very poor. At short separation, the three-body interaction is not sufficient to account for the full many-body interaction. This is confirmed by equilibrium Monte Carlo simulations of up to ten inclusions.

张力膜和无张力膜的点状曲率模型中蛋白质内含物之间的多体相互作用
在小变形机制下,比较了生物膜中锥形整体蛋白质内含物变形介导相互作用的点状曲率约束(PCC)模型和圆盘脱离角(DDA)模型。考虑到膜蛋白的半径与膜厚度相当,两种模型中哪一种最合适并不明显。对于无张力膜中的两个蛋白质,PCC模型和DDA模型在其分离的前阶(\sim r^{-4}\)上是一致的,但在后阶上则不同。然而,对于大于两倍蛋白质直径的距离,两者的差异小于\(10\%\)。与 DDA 模型一样,PCC 模型以一种非近似的方式包含了所有多体相互作用。在这两种模型中,三角形和正方形蛋白质团簇的多体能量的渐近((\sim r^{-4}\))是完全一样的。然而,五角形集群的表现却不同;在PCC模型中,它们的能量是消失的,而在DDA模型中,它们的渐近幂律是非消失的弱\(\sim r^{-6}\)。我们量化了在无张力膜或有张力膜中由三个、四个和五个具有相同或相反曲率的夹杂物组成的多边形小簇中多体相互作用的重要性。我们发现,成对近似几乎总是很差。在短距离内,三体相互作用不足以解释全部的多体相互作用。多达十个夹杂物的平衡蒙特卡罗模拟证实了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal E
The European Physical Journal E CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: EPJ E publishes papers describing advances in the understanding of physical aspects of Soft, Liquid and Living Systems. Soft matter is a generic term for a large group of condensed, often heterogeneous systems -- often also called complex fluids -- that display a large response to weak external perturbations and that possess properties governed by slow internal dynamics. Flowing matter refers to all systems that can actually flow, from simple to multiphase liquids, from foams to granular matter. Living matter concerns the new physics that emerges from novel insights into the properties and behaviours of living systems. Furthermore, it aims at developing new concepts and quantitative approaches for the study of biological phenomena. Approaches from soft matter physics and statistical physics play a key role in this research. The journal includes reports of experimental, computational and theoretical studies and appeals to the broad interdisciplinary communities including physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics and materials science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信