Heating and cooling geothermal systems in urban settings: The potential of energy micropiles

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yozy Kepdib M.F , Singh R.M , Madiai C , Facciorusso J.A
{"title":"Heating and cooling geothermal systems in urban settings: The potential of energy micropiles","authors":"Yozy Kepdib M.F ,&nbsp;Singh R.M ,&nbsp;Madiai C ,&nbsp;Facciorusso J.A","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the 1980s, the utilization of geostructures for heating and cooling buildings has evolved significantly, initially with base slabs and later expanding to include various structures like piles, retaining walls, and tunnels, collectively termed as energy geostructures. These systems facilitate heat exchange between the ground and buildings by circulating a heat exchange fluid through plastic pipes embedded within the geostructures. In the realm of structural rehabilitation and retrofitting, micropiles have gained preference over traditional piles due to their smaller installation equipment, reduced noise, and limited vibration, making them an attractive option, particularly in densely populated urban areas. However, despite the potential of energy micropiles (EMPs), they have received little attention compared to energy piles. This study conducts a comprehensive review on geothermal energy and EMPs, highlighting their potential in heating and cooling structures in urban areas. Their long-term heat exchange rates, typically ranging from 30 to 50 W/m, are influenced by factors such as pipe configuration, pipe diameter, fluid flow rate, soil thermal conductivity, groundwater presence, temperature differentials, and seasonal variations. The small dimensions of micropiles may lead to increased thermal resistance due to interference between U- shape pipes, while group installations can reduce individual micropile thermal efficiency. Moreover, significant thermal stresses are induced, and they increase with cycles. Optimal performance is achievable with corrugated pipes, a coaxial pipe configuration and intermittent operation. This study highlights the need for continued innovation and partnership to advance the adoption of EMPs, thereby enhancing energy efficiency, climate resilience, and environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124006920","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1980s, the utilization of geostructures for heating and cooling buildings has evolved significantly, initially with base slabs and later expanding to include various structures like piles, retaining walls, and tunnels, collectively termed as energy geostructures. These systems facilitate heat exchange between the ground and buildings by circulating a heat exchange fluid through plastic pipes embedded within the geostructures. In the realm of structural rehabilitation and retrofitting, micropiles have gained preference over traditional piles due to their smaller installation equipment, reduced noise, and limited vibration, making them an attractive option, particularly in densely populated urban areas. However, despite the potential of energy micropiles (EMPs), they have received little attention compared to energy piles. This study conducts a comprehensive review on geothermal energy and EMPs, highlighting their potential in heating and cooling structures in urban areas. Their long-term heat exchange rates, typically ranging from 30 to 50 W/m, are influenced by factors such as pipe configuration, pipe diameter, fluid flow rate, soil thermal conductivity, groundwater presence, temperature differentials, and seasonal variations. The small dimensions of micropiles may lead to increased thermal resistance due to interference between U- shape pipes, while group installations can reduce individual micropile thermal efficiency. Moreover, significant thermal stresses are induced, and they increase with cycles. Optimal performance is achievable with corrugated pipes, a coaxial pipe configuration and intermittent operation. This study highlights the need for continued innovation and partnership to advance the adoption of EMPs, thereby enhancing energy efficiency, climate resilience, and environmental sustainability.

Abstract Image

城市环境中的供暖和制冷地热系统:能源微桩的潜力
自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,利用土工结构为建筑物供暖和制冷的技术有了长足的发展,最初是底板,后来扩展到桩基、挡土墙和隧道等各种结构,统称为能源土工结构。这些系统通过嵌入土工结构中的塑料管道循环热交换流体,促进地面与建筑物之间的热交换。在结构修复和改造领域,微桩因其安装设备小、噪音低、振动小等优点,比传统桩基更受欢迎,尤其是在人口稠密的城市地区。然而,尽管能量微桩(EMP)具有巨大潜力,但与能量桩相比,它们却很少受到关注。本研究对地热能和 EMPs 进行了全面综述,强调了它们在城市地区供暖和制冷结构中的潜力。它们的长期热交换率通常在 30 到 50 W/m 之间,受管道配置、管道直径、流体流速、土壤导热率、地下水存在、温差和季节变化等因素的影响。微桩的尺寸较小,U 形管道之间的干扰可能会导致热阻增加,而分组安装则会降低单个微桩的热效率。此外,微桩会产生巨大的热应力,并随着循环次数的增加而增大。采用波纹管、同轴管道配置和间歇运行可实现最佳性能。这项研究强调了持续创新和合作的必要性,以推动 EMP 的采用,从而提高能源效率、气候适应能力和环境可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信