The moderating influence of social cognition in the relationship between affect and physical activity in adolescents: An ecological momentary assessment study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Calissa J. Leslie-Miller, Christopher C. Cushing
{"title":"The moderating influence of social cognition in the relationship between affect and physical activity in adolescents: An ecological momentary assessment study","authors":"Calissa J. Leslie-Miller,&nbsp;Christopher C. Cushing","doi":"10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Affective states influence subsequent engagement in physical activity, but the nature of this relationship varies substantially from person-to-person (e.g., negative affect may precede increased physical activity for some adolescents and decreased for others).</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Explore which variables may explain the individual differences in the relationship between incidental affect and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study explores social cognitive variables as moderators of the relationship between incidental affect and MVPA through a 20-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study, in which 100 adolescents aged 13–18 years old (<em>M</em> = 14.45, <em>SD</em> = 1.37) were asked to complete a baseline assessment of their self-efficacy and outcome expectancies. Subsequently, wore an Actigraph (wGT3X-BT) accelerometer 24 h per day on their non-dominant wrist and answered EMA surveys assessing affect 4 times per day using time-based signaling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Within-person negative affect predicted MVPA (<em>b</em> = −0.15 <em>p</em> &lt; .05) with 95% CI [-0.29, −0.01], as did between-person negative affect (<em>b</em> = 0.08 <em>p</em> &lt; .05) with 95% CI [0.01, 0.15]. Additionally, there was a significant interaction between within-person negative affect and self-efficacy such that for individuals low in self-efficacy (&lt;2.08 on a 5-point scale) increased negative affect led to decreased MVPA (<em>b</em> = −0.06, <em>p</em> &lt; .05), but not for individuals high in self-efficacy (&gt;5.14 on a 5-point scale; <em>b</em> = 0.07, <em>p</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results indicate that self-efficacy is an important target for overcoming the deleterious effects of momentary negative affect on MVPA and suggests just-in-time intervention techniques for individuals who are typical or low in self-efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296624000681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Affective states influence subsequent engagement in physical activity, but the nature of this relationship varies substantially from person-to-person (e.g., negative affect may precede increased physical activity for some adolescents and decreased for others).

Purpose

Explore which variables may explain the individual differences in the relationship between incidental affect and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

Methods

This study explores social cognitive variables as moderators of the relationship between incidental affect and MVPA through a 20-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study, in which 100 adolescents aged 13–18 years old (M = 14.45, SD = 1.37) were asked to complete a baseline assessment of their self-efficacy and outcome expectancies. Subsequently, wore an Actigraph (wGT3X-BT) accelerometer 24 h per day on their non-dominant wrist and answered EMA surveys assessing affect 4 times per day using time-based signaling.

Results

Within-person negative affect predicted MVPA (b = −0.15 p < .05) with 95% CI [-0.29, −0.01], as did between-person negative affect (b = 0.08 p < .05) with 95% CI [0.01, 0.15]. Additionally, there was a significant interaction between within-person negative affect and self-efficacy such that for individuals low in self-efficacy (<2.08 on a 5-point scale) increased negative affect led to decreased MVPA (b = −0.06, p < .05), but not for individuals high in self-efficacy (>5.14 on a 5-point scale; b = 0.07, p < .05).

Conclusions

Results indicate that self-efficacy is an important target for overcoming the deleterious effects of momentary negative affect on MVPA and suggests just-in-time intervention techniques for individuals who are typical or low in self-efficacy.
社会认知对青少年情感与体育锻炼关系的调节作用:生态瞬间评估研究
背景情绪状态会影响随后的体育锻炼,但这种关系的性质因人而异(例如,有些青少年在增加体育锻炼之前会产生消极情绪,而另一些青少年则会减少)、目的 探讨哪些变量可以解释偶发情绪与中强度体育锻炼(MVPA)之间关系的个体差异。)方法本研究通过一项为期 20 天的生态瞬间评估(EMA)研究,探索社会认知变量作为偶然情感与 MVPA 之间关系的调节因素。在这项研究中,100 名 13-18 岁的青少年(中=14.45,标差=1.37)被要求完成自我效能感和结果预期的基线评估。随后,他们每天 24 小时在非惯用手腕上佩戴 Actigraph(wGT3X-BT)加速度计,并每天 4 次使用基于时间的信号回答评估情绪的 EMA 调查。结果人内负面情绪可预测 MVPA(b = -0.15 p < .05),95% CI [-0.29, -0.01];人间负面情绪也可预测 MVPA(b = 0.08 p < .05),95% CI [0.01, 0.15]。此外,人与人之间的负面情绪与自我效能感之间存在显著的交互作用,对于自我效能感低的人(5 分制,2.08 分),负面情绪的增加会导致 MVPA 的减少(b = -0.06,p <.05),但对于自我效能感高的人(5 分制,5.14 分,p <.05),负面情绪的增加不会导致 MVPA 的减少(b = -0.06,p <.05)。结论研究结果表明,自我效能感是克服瞬间负面情绪对 MVPA 有害影响的重要目标,并为典型或低自我效能感的个体提供了及时干预技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信