Grid expectations: How service design and business model innovation can support mini-grid development in Kenya

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Fiona Lambe, Carol Mungo, Mbeo Ogeya
{"title":"Grid expectations: How service design and business model innovation can support mini-grid development in Kenya","authors":"Fiona Lambe,&nbsp;Carol Mungo,&nbsp;Mbeo Ogeya","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving universal access to electricity is central to the Agenda for Sustainable Development. However, over half a billion people in Sub-Saharan Africa are currently at risk of being left without electricity access by 2030. A rapid scale up of off-grid renewable electrification is needed to close the energy access gap, requiring innovation and new collaborations between private actors, the public sector, and service users. Several critical challenges to scaling access to mini-grids remain, most notably a lack of investment, and the uncertain regulatory environment in many sub-Saharan African countries. This study aimed to provide evidence about how external risks affect mini-grid business models and the strategies that developers apply to manage challenges. We compared two case studies of private sector-led mini-grids in Kenya interviewing a range of key stakeholders for each case. The data were analysed using a framework informed by business model innovation, frugal innovation, and the service design concept of value co-creation. We found that value co-creation is influenced by factors including political interference, regulatory uncertainty and customers' previous experiences with other energy services and their expectations of the new service. The strategies that developers use to address these challenges can have both positive and negative consequences for value co-creation. The ability to maintain focus on delivering a service that incorporates the core frugal aspects of reliability, affordability, simplicity and adaptability appears to be a key factor determining how well a firm navigates external pressures, influencing the overall viability of the business model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103788"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003797","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving universal access to electricity is central to the Agenda for Sustainable Development. However, over half a billion people in Sub-Saharan Africa are currently at risk of being left without electricity access by 2030. A rapid scale up of off-grid renewable electrification is needed to close the energy access gap, requiring innovation and new collaborations between private actors, the public sector, and service users. Several critical challenges to scaling access to mini-grids remain, most notably a lack of investment, and the uncertain regulatory environment in many sub-Saharan African countries. This study aimed to provide evidence about how external risks affect mini-grid business models and the strategies that developers apply to manage challenges. We compared two case studies of private sector-led mini-grids in Kenya interviewing a range of key stakeholders for each case. The data were analysed using a framework informed by business model innovation, frugal innovation, and the service design concept of value co-creation. We found that value co-creation is influenced by factors including political interference, regulatory uncertainty and customers' previous experiences with other energy services and their expectations of the new service. The strategies that developers use to address these challenges can have both positive and negative consequences for value co-creation. The ability to maintain focus on delivering a service that incorporates the core frugal aspects of reliability, affordability, simplicity and adaptability appears to be a key factor determining how well a firm navigates external pressures, influencing the overall viability of the business model.
电网期望:服务设计和商业模式创新如何支持肯尼亚微型电网发展
实现电力普及是可持续发展议程的核心。然而,目前撒哈拉以南非洲地区有超过 5 亿人面临到 2030 年无法用上电的风险。需要迅速扩大离网可再生能源电气化的规模,以缩小能源获取方面的差距,这需要创新以及私营企业、公共部门和服务用户之间的新合作。要扩大微型电网的使用范围,仍面临一些关键挑战,其中最突出的是投资不足,以及许多撒哈拉以南非洲国家的监管环境不确定。本研究旨在提供证据,说明外部风险如何影响微型电网的商业模式,以及开发商应对挑战的策略。我们对肯尼亚私营部门主导的两个微型电网案例进行了比较研究,并就每个案例采访了一系列主要利益相关者。我们利用商业模式创新、节俭创新和价值共创的服务设计概念所提供的框架对数据进行了分析。我们发现,价值共创受到各种因素的影响,包括政治干预、监管的不确定性、客户以前使用其他能源服务的经验以及他们对新服务的期望。开发商应对这些挑战的策略会对价值共创产生积极和消极的影响。能否继续专注于提供包含可靠性、可负担性、简单性和适应性等核心节俭要素的服务,似乎是决定企业能否很好地应对外部压力、影响商业模式整体可行性的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信