{"title":"Removal of selenate from wastewater using a bioelectrochemical reactor: The importance of measuring selenide and the role of competing anions","authors":"Benhur K. Asefaw , Huan Chen , Youneng Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.bej.2024.109531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Removal of selenate (SeO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>) from selenate-contaminated wastewater is challenging due to the commonly co-existing and competing anions of sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>). This study investigates SeO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction to elemental selenium (Se<sup>0</sup>) in a cathode-based bioelectrochemical (BEC) reactor and a conventional biofilm reactor (<em>i.e.</em>, an upflow anaerobic reactor). The simulated wastewater contained SeO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> at a typical concentration of 5 mg Se/L, SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> at a typical concentration of 1000 mg S/L, and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> at concentrations that varied from 0 to 10 mg N/L. The impact of sulfate on the BEC reactor was much lower than that on the conventional reactor: The selenium removal, defined as (selenate in influent – dissolved selenium in effluent)/selenate in influent, was 99 % in the BEC reactor versus 69 % in the conventional biofilm reactor. The lower selenium removal in the conventional reactor was mainly due to the >10 times higher reduction of sulfate, which directly caused competition between sulfate and selenate for the common resources such as electrons. The more reduction of sulfate in the conventional reactor further led to 45 times higher production of selenide. Selenide is usually assumed to be minimal and therefore not measured in the literature. This simplification may significantly overestimate selenium removal when the influent sulfate concentration is very high. NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> in the influent of the BEC reactor promoted selenium removal when it was less than 5.0 mg N/L but inhibited selenate removal when it was more than 7.5 mg N/L. This was supported by the microbial community analysis and intermediate (nitrite) analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8766,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 109531"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X24003188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Removal of selenate (SeO42-) from selenate-contaminated wastewater is challenging due to the commonly co-existing and competing anions of sulfate (SO42-) and nitrate (NO3-). This study investigates SeO42− reduction to elemental selenium (Se0) in a cathode-based bioelectrochemical (BEC) reactor and a conventional biofilm reactor (i.e., an upflow anaerobic reactor). The simulated wastewater contained SeO42− at a typical concentration of 5 mg Se/L, SO42− at a typical concentration of 1000 mg S/L, and NO3− at concentrations that varied from 0 to 10 mg N/L. The impact of sulfate on the BEC reactor was much lower than that on the conventional reactor: The selenium removal, defined as (selenate in influent – dissolved selenium in effluent)/selenate in influent, was 99 % in the BEC reactor versus 69 % in the conventional biofilm reactor. The lower selenium removal in the conventional reactor was mainly due to the >10 times higher reduction of sulfate, which directly caused competition between sulfate and selenate for the common resources such as electrons. The more reduction of sulfate in the conventional reactor further led to 45 times higher production of selenide. Selenide is usually assumed to be minimal and therefore not measured in the literature. This simplification may significantly overestimate selenium removal when the influent sulfate concentration is very high. NO3- in the influent of the BEC reactor promoted selenium removal when it was less than 5.0 mg N/L but inhibited selenate removal when it was more than 7.5 mg N/L. This was supported by the microbial community analysis and intermediate (nitrite) analysis.
期刊介绍:
The Biochemical Engineering Journal aims to promote progress in the crucial chemical engineering aspects of the development of biological processes associated with everything from raw materials preparation to product recovery relevant to industries as diverse as medical/healthcare, industrial biotechnology, and environmental biotechnology.
The Journal welcomes full length original research papers, short communications, and review papers* in the following research fields:
Biocatalysis (enzyme or microbial) and biotransformations, including immobilized biocatalyst preparation and kinetics
Biosensors and Biodevices including biofabrication and novel fuel cell development
Bioseparations including scale-up and protein refolding/renaturation
Environmental Bioengineering including bioconversion, bioremediation, and microbial fuel cells
Bioreactor Systems including characterization, optimization and scale-up
Bioresources and Biorefinery Engineering including biomass conversion, biofuels, bioenergy, and optimization
Industrial Biotechnology including specialty chemicals, platform chemicals and neutraceuticals
Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering including bioartificial organs, cell encapsulation, and controlled release
Cell Culture Engineering (plant, animal or insect cells) including viral vectors, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, vaccines, and secondary metabolites
Cell Therapies and Stem Cells including pluripotent, mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells; immunotherapies; tissue-specific differentiation; and cryopreservation
Metabolic Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology including OMICS, bioinformatics, in silico biology, and metabolic flux analysis
Protein Engineering including enzyme engineering and directed evolution.