Short-term intermittent fasting and energy restriction do not impair rates of muscle protein synthesis: A randomised, controlled dietary intervention

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Imre W.K. Kouw , Evelyn B. Parr , Michael J. Wheeler , Bridget E. Radford , Rebecca C. Hall , Joan M. Senden , Joy P.B. Goessens , Luc J.C. van Loon , John A. Hawley
{"title":"Short-term intermittent fasting and energy restriction do not impair rates of muscle protein synthesis: A randomised, controlled dietary intervention","authors":"Imre W.K. Kouw ,&nbsp;Evelyn B. Parr ,&nbsp;Michael J. Wheeler ,&nbsp;Bridget E. Radford ,&nbsp;Rebecca C. Hall ,&nbsp;Joan M. Senden ,&nbsp;Joy P.B. Goessens ,&nbsp;Luc J.C. van Loon ,&nbsp;John A. Hawley","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intermittent fasting (IF) is an effective energy restricted dietary strategy to reduce body and fat mass and improve metabolic health in individuals with either an overweight or obese status. However, dietary energy restriction may impair muscle protein synthesis (MPS) resulting in a concomitant decline in lean body mass. Due to periods of prolonged fasting combined with irregular meal intake, we hypothesised that IF would reduce rates of MPS compared to an energy balanced diet with regular meal patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We assessed the impact of a short-term, ten days, alternate day fasting or a continuous energy restricted diet to a control diet on integrated rates of skeletal MPS in middle-aged males with overweight or obesity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-seven middle-aged males with overweight or obesity (age: 44.6 ± 5.4 y; BMI: 30.3 ± 2.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) consumed a three-day lead-in diet, followed by a ten-day controlled dietary intervention matched for protein intake, as alternate day fasting (ADF: 62.5 energy (En)%, days of 25 En% alternated with days of 100 En% food ingestion), continuous energy restriction (CER: 62.5 En%), or an energy balanced, control diet (CON: 100 En%). Deuterated water (D<sub>2</sub>O) methodology with saliva, blood, and skeletal muscle sampling were used to assess integrated rates of MPS over the ten-day intervention period. Secondary measures included fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and gastrointestinal hormone concentrations, continuous glucose monitoring, and assessment of body composition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no differences in daily rates of MPS between groups (ADF: 1.18 ± 0.13, CER: 1.13 ± 0.16, and CON: 1.18 ± 0.18 %/day, <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The reductions in body mass were greater in ADF and CER compared to CON (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Lean and fat mass were decreased by a similar magnitude across groups (main time effect, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; main group effect, <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Fasting plasma leptin concentrations decreased in ADF and CER (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), with no differences in fasting plasma glucose or insulin concentrations between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Short-term alternate day fasting does not lower rates of MPS compared to continuous energy restriction or an energy balanced, control diet with matched protein intake. The prolonged effects of IF and periods of irregular energy and protein intake patterns on muscle mass maintenance remain to be investigated. This trial was registered under Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (<span><span>https://www.anzctr.org.au</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), identifier no. ACTRN12619000757112.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"43 11","pages":"Pages 174-184"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424003455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intermittent fasting (IF) is an effective energy restricted dietary strategy to reduce body and fat mass and improve metabolic health in individuals with either an overweight or obese status. However, dietary energy restriction may impair muscle protein synthesis (MPS) resulting in a concomitant decline in lean body mass. Due to periods of prolonged fasting combined with irregular meal intake, we hypothesised that IF would reduce rates of MPS compared to an energy balanced diet with regular meal patterns.

Aims

We assessed the impact of a short-term, ten days, alternate day fasting or a continuous energy restricted diet to a control diet on integrated rates of skeletal MPS in middle-aged males with overweight or obesity.

Methods

Twenty-seven middle-aged males with overweight or obesity (age: 44.6 ± 5.4 y; BMI: 30.3 ± 2.6 kg/m2) consumed a three-day lead-in diet, followed by a ten-day controlled dietary intervention matched for protein intake, as alternate day fasting (ADF: 62.5 energy (En)%, days of 25 En% alternated with days of 100 En% food ingestion), continuous energy restriction (CER: 62.5 En%), or an energy balanced, control diet (CON: 100 En%). Deuterated water (D2O) methodology with saliva, blood, and skeletal muscle sampling were used to assess integrated rates of MPS over the ten-day intervention period. Secondary measures included fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and gastrointestinal hormone concentrations, continuous glucose monitoring, and assessment of body composition.

Results

There were no differences in daily rates of MPS between groups (ADF: 1.18 ± 0.13, CER: 1.13 ± 0.16, and CON: 1.18 ± 0.18 %/day, P > 0.05). The reductions in body mass were greater in ADF and CER compared to CON (P < 0.001). Lean and fat mass were decreased by a similar magnitude across groups (main time effect, P < 0.001; main group effect, P > 0.05). Fasting plasma leptin concentrations decreased in ADF and CER (P < 0.001), with no differences in fasting plasma glucose or insulin concentrations between groups.

Conclusion

Short-term alternate day fasting does not lower rates of MPS compared to continuous energy restriction or an energy balanced, control diet with matched protein intake. The prolonged effects of IF and periods of irregular energy and protein intake patterns on muscle mass maintenance remain to be investigated. This trial was registered under Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au), identifier no. ACTRN12619000757112.
短期间歇性禁食和能量限制不会影响肌肉蛋白质合成率:随机对照饮食干预
背景间歇性禁食(IF)是一种有效的能量限制饮食策略,可减少超重或肥胖者的体重和脂肪量,改善代谢健康。然而,饮食能量限制可能会影响肌肉蛋白质合成(MPS),从而导致瘦体重下降。目的我们评估了短期(十天)隔日禁食或持续限制能量饮食与对照饮食对超重或肥胖中年男性骨骼肌蛋白合成综合率的影响。方法27 名超重或肥胖的中年男性(年龄:44.6 ± 5.4 y;体重指数:30.3 ± 2.6 kg/m2)先进行为期三天的诱导饮食,然后进行为期十天的控制饮食干预,以匹配蛋白质摄入量,即隔日禁食(ADF:62.5能量(En)%,摄入25 En%能量的天数与摄入100 En%能量的天数交替)、持续能量限制(CER:62.5 En%)或能量平衡控制饮食(CON:100 En%)。氘化水(D2O)方法与唾液、血液和骨骼肌采样相结合,用于评估十天干预期间 MPS 的综合比率。次要测量指标包括空腹血浆葡萄糖、胰岛素和胃肠道激素浓度、连续血糖监测和身体成分评估。结果各组间的每日 MPS 率没有差异(ADF:1.18 ± 0.13;CER:1.13 ± 0.16;CON:1.18 ± 0.18 %/天,P > 0.05)。与 CON 相比,ADF 和 CER 的体重减少幅度更大(P < 0.001)。各组的瘦肉和脂肪质量下降幅度相似(主要时间效应,P <0.001;主要组别效应,P >0.05)。结论与持续能量限制或能量平衡、蛋白质摄入匹配的控制饮食相比,短期隔日禁食不会降低 MPS 的发病率。隔日禁食以及不规则的能量和蛋白质摄入模式对肌肉质量维持的长期影响仍有待研究。该试验已在澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验注册中心(https://www.anzctr.org.au)注册,标识符编号为:actrn1261900075。ACTRN12619000757112。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信