Comparative analysis of particle exposure in commuters: Evaluating different modes of transportation in Tehran

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
{"title":"Comparative analysis of particle exposure in commuters: Evaluating different modes of transportation in Tehran","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Daily commuting significantly contributes to the overall exposure to particulate matter (PM) in urban areas, underscoring the need to understand the factors influencing PM exposure. This study assessed personal exposure levels and inhalation doses of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub> across various transportation modes in Tehran, Iran. The study included buses, open-window taxis, subways, walking, and cycling for over 125 trips. Data were collected during the morning and evening peak hours using low-cost sensors, with an average trip distance of 7.50 km. On average, buses exhibited the highest mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration (25.0 <span><math><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></mfrac></mrow></math></span>), followed by subways (17.0 <span><math><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></mfrac></mrow></math></span>), taxis (14.4 <span><math><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></mfrac></mrow></math></span>), cycling (13.5 <span><math><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></mfrac></mrow></math></span>), and walking (8.80 <span><math><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></mfrac></mrow></math></span>). Pearson correlation analysis showed a strong relationship between traffic volume and PM concentrations in taxi and bus modes (r = 0.78 and 0.56, respectively). Subway commuters experienced the lowest PM<sub>2.5</sub> inhalation dose (2.50 μg), whereas bus commuters experienced the highest (6.20 μg). Pedestrians had the highest average inhalation dose of PM<sub>2.5</sub> with 20.7 μg due to longer trip durations. The daily average PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels in all transportation modes exceeded the WHO thresholds by 1.60 times. These findings offer crucial insights into personal exposure concentrations among commuters and serve as a basis for effective air quality management plans and broader global investigations of air pollution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324010254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Daily commuting significantly contributes to the overall exposure to particulate matter (PM) in urban areas, underscoring the need to understand the factors influencing PM exposure. This study assessed personal exposure levels and inhalation doses of PM2.5, and PM10 across various transportation modes in Tehran, Iran. The study included buses, open-window taxis, subways, walking, and cycling for over 125 trips. Data were collected during the morning and evening peak hours using low-cost sensors, with an average trip distance of 7.50 km. On average, buses exhibited the highest mean PM2.5 concentration (25.0 μgm3), followed by subways (17.0 μgm3), taxis (14.4 μgm3), cycling (13.5 μgm3), and walking (8.80 μgm3). Pearson correlation analysis showed a strong relationship between traffic volume and PM concentrations in taxi and bus modes (r = 0.78 and 0.56, respectively). Subway commuters experienced the lowest PM2.5 inhalation dose (2.50 μg), whereas bus commuters experienced the highest (6.20 μg). Pedestrians had the highest average inhalation dose of PM2.5 with 20.7 μg due to longer trip durations. The daily average PM2.5 levels in all transportation modes exceeded the WHO thresholds by 1.60 times. These findings offer crucial insights into personal exposure concentrations among commuters and serve as a basis for effective air quality management plans and broader global investigations of air pollution.
通勤者接触颗粒物的比较分析:评估德黑兰的不同交通方式
日常通勤大大增加了城市地区颗粒物(PM)的总体暴露量,因此有必要了解影响PM暴露量的因素。这项研究评估了伊朗德黑兰各种交通模式下个人接触 PM2.5 和 PM10 的水平和吸入剂量。研究对象包括公交车、开窗出租车、地铁、步行和骑自行车等超过 125 次出行。数据是在早晚高峰时段使用低成本传感器收集的,平均行程为 7.50 公里。平均而言,公交车的 PM2.5 平均浓度最高(25.0 μgm3),其次是地铁(17.0 μgm3)、出租车(14.4 μgm3)、自行车(13.5 μgm3)和步行(8.80 μgm3)。皮尔逊相关分析表明,出租车和公交车的交通流量与 PM 浓度之间的关系密切(r 分别为 0.78 和 0.56)。地铁乘客的 PM2.5 吸入量最低(2.50 微克),而公交乘客的吸入量最高(6.20 微克)。由于出行时间较长,行人的 PM2.5 平均吸入剂量最高,为 20.7 微克。所有交通工具的 PM2.5 日平均水平都超过了世界卫生组织阈值的 1.60 倍。这些研究结果为了解通勤者的个人暴露浓度提供了重要依据,也为有效的空气质量管理计划和更广泛的全球空气污染调查提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信