Toward diversification of acute stressors and precision stress research: A stage 2 Registered Report validating a reward-salient stress task in emerging adults.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Daniel P Moriarity,Julia Case,Marin M Kautz,Kubarah Ghias,Kirsta Pennypacker,Douglas J Angus,Eddie Harmon-Jones,Lauren B Alloy
{"title":"Toward diversification of acute stressors and precision stress research: A stage 2 Registered Report validating a reward-salient stress task in emerging adults.","authors":"Daniel P Moriarity,Julia Case,Marin M Kautz,Kubarah Ghias,Kirsta Pennypacker,Douglas J Angus,Eddie Harmon-Jones,Lauren B Alloy","doi":"10.1037/abn0000948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress is one of, if not the, most ubiquitously studied risk factor across the health sciences. This is unlikely to change given that the primary drivers of mortality and disability are chronic, stress-mediated illnesses (often highly comorbid with psychopathology). We argue that an important limitation of stress research is the consistency with which the Trier Social Stress Test is used when the research questions are not specific to social stress. We advocate for precision stress research using qualitatively different stressors to facilitate exploration of how different types of stressors might differentially impact health outcomes, including psychopathology. This registered report validates a reward-salient stress task (a modified Anger Incentive Delay Task) in a sample of 101 emerging adults, over half of whom reported clinically relevant anxiety, hypo/mania, depression, and/or suicidal ideation, who participated in a study between 2020 and 2022. This task involves teaching participants a game where they can win money. Part way through, the \"goal frustration\" condition changes the rules such that correct responses to trials with anticipatory stimuli indicating the possibility to win money actually lose money on 56% of trials despite visual feedback indicating that responses were successful. Results consistently indicated that the Anger Incentive Delay Task successfully reduced positive emotions and motivation and increased negative emotions. The magnitude of these responses was predicted by individual differences in reward and punishment sensitivity. Given the breadth of psychopathologies that share both (a) stress and (b) reward and punishment sensitivity as risk factors, a reward-salient acute stress task is an important tool for precision psychopathology research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress is one of, if not the, most ubiquitously studied risk factor across the health sciences. This is unlikely to change given that the primary drivers of mortality and disability are chronic, stress-mediated illnesses (often highly comorbid with psychopathology). We argue that an important limitation of stress research is the consistency with which the Trier Social Stress Test is used when the research questions are not specific to social stress. We advocate for precision stress research using qualitatively different stressors to facilitate exploration of how different types of stressors might differentially impact health outcomes, including psychopathology. This registered report validates a reward-salient stress task (a modified Anger Incentive Delay Task) in a sample of 101 emerging adults, over half of whom reported clinically relevant anxiety, hypo/mania, depression, and/or suicidal ideation, who participated in a study between 2020 and 2022. This task involves teaching participants a game where they can win money. Part way through, the "goal frustration" condition changes the rules such that correct responses to trials with anticipatory stimuli indicating the possibility to win money actually lose money on 56% of trials despite visual feedback indicating that responses were successful. Results consistently indicated that the Anger Incentive Delay Task successfully reduced positive emotions and motivation and increased negative emotions. The magnitude of these responses was predicted by individual differences in reward and punishment sensitivity. Given the breadth of psychopathologies that share both (a) stress and (b) reward and punishment sensitivity as risk factors, a reward-salient acute stress task is an important tool for precision psychopathology research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
实现急性压力源多样化和精准压力研究:第 2 阶段注册报告:在新成人中验证奖励-愉悦压力任务。
压力是健康科学领域研究最多的风险因素之一,甚至是最普遍的风险因素。鉴于导致死亡和残疾的主要因素是压力介导的慢性疾病(通常与精神病理学高度合并),这种情况不太可能改变。我们认为,压力研究的一个重要局限性在于,当研究问题并非专门针对社会压力时,特里尔社会压力测试的使用是一致的。我们主张使用定性不同的压力源进行精确的压力研究,以促进探索不同类型的压力源如何对健康结果(包括精神病理学)产生不同的影响。本注册报告验证了一项奖励阈值压力任务(改良的愤怒激励延迟任务),该任务的样本是在2020年至2022年期间参与研究的101名新兴成年人,其中一半以上报告了临床相关的焦虑、低血压/躁狂症、抑郁症和/或自杀意念。这项任务包括教参与者玩一个可以赢钱的游戏。游戏进行到一半时,"目标受挫 "条件改变了游戏规则,因此,尽管视觉反馈表明参与者的反应是成功的,但在56%的试验中,参与者对表明可能赢钱的预期刺激做出的正确反应实际上是输钱的。结果一致表明,愤怒激励延迟任务成功地减少了积极情绪和动机,增加了消极情绪。这些反应的程度是由奖惩敏感性的个体差异所预测的。鉴于精神病理学的广泛性(a)压力和(b)奖惩敏感性都是风险因素,奖惩敏感性急性压力任务是精确精神病理学研究的重要工具。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信