Developing a suicide risk model for use in the Indian Health Service

Roy Adams, Emily E. Haroz, Paul Rebman, Rose Suttle, Luke Grosvenor, Mira Bajaj, Rohan R. Dayal, Dominick Maggio, Chelsea L. Kettering, Novalene Goklish
{"title":"Developing a suicide risk model for use in the Indian Health Service","authors":"Roy Adams, Emily E. Haroz, Paul Rebman, Rose Suttle, Luke Grosvenor, Mira Bajaj, Rohan R. Dayal, Dominick Maggio, Chelsea L. Kettering, Novalene Goklish","doi":"10.1038/s44184-024-00088-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We developed and evaluated an electronic health record (EHR)-based model for suicide risk specific to an American Indian patient population. Using EHR data for all patients over 18 with a visit between 1/1/2017 and 10/2/2021, we developed a model for the risk of a suicide attempt or death in the 90 days following a visit. Features included demographics, medications, diagnoses, and scores from relevant screening tools. We compared the predictive performance of logistic regression and random forest models against existing suicide screening, which was augmented to include the history of previous attempts or ideation. During the study, 16,835 patients had 331,588 visits, with 490 attempts and 37 deaths by suicide. The logistic regression and random forest models (area under the ROC (AUROC) 0.83 [0.80–0.86]; both models) performed better than enhanced screening (AUROC 0.64 [0.61–0.67]). These results suggest that an EHR-based suicide risk model can add value to existing practices at Indian Health Service clinics.","PeriodicalId":74321,"journal":{"name":"Npj mental health research","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-024-00088-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Npj mental health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-024-00088-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We developed and evaluated an electronic health record (EHR)-based model for suicide risk specific to an American Indian patient population. Using EHR data for all patients over 18 with a visit between 1/1/2017 and 10/2/2021, we developed a model for the risk of a suicide attempt or death in the 90 days following a visit. Features included demographics, medications, diagnoses, and scores from relevant screening tools. We compared the predictive performance of logistic regression and random forest models against existing suicide screening, which was augmented to include the history of previous attempts or ideation. During the study, 16,835 patients had 331,588 visits, with 490 attempts and 37 deaths by suicide. The logistic regression and random forest models (area under the ROC (AUROC) 0.83 [0.80–0.86]; both models) performed better than enhanced screening (AUROC 0.64 [0.61–0.67]). These results suggest that an EHR-based suicide risk model can add value to existing practices at Indian Health Service clinics.

Abstract Image

开发用于印第安人健康服务的自杀风险模型
我们开发并评估了一种基于电子健康记录(EHR)的美国印第安患者自杀风险模型。利用所有在 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 10 日期间就诊的 18 岁以上患者的电子病历数据,我们开发了一个就诊后 90 天内自杀未遂或死亡风险模型。特征包括人口统计学、药物、诊断和相关筛查工具的评分。我们将逻辑回归模型和随机森林模型的预测性能与现有的自杀筛查进行了比较,后者增加了既往自杀未遂史或意念史。研究期间,16835 名患者共就诊 331588 次,其中 490 人自杀未遂,37 人自杀身亡。逻辑回归和随机森林模型(ROC 下面积 (AUROC) 0.83 [0.80-0.86];两种模型均是)的表现优于增强型筛查(AUROC 0.64 [0.61-0.67])。这些结果表明,基于电子病历的自杀风险模型可以为印第安人健康服务诊所的现有实践增添价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信