Interacting Dark Energy and Its Implications for Unified Dark Sector

IF 1.3 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pradosh Keshav MV, Kenath Arun
{"title":"Interacting Dark Energy and Its Implications for Unified Dark Sector","authors":"Pradosh Keshav MV,&nbsp;Kenath Arun","doi":"10.1007/s10773-024-05794-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Alternative dark energy models were proposed to address the limitation of the standard concordance model. Though different phenomenological considerations of such models are widely studied, scenarios where they interact with each other remain unexplored. In this context, we study interacting dark energy scenarios (IDEs), incorporating alternative dark energy models. The three models that are considered in this study are time-varying <span>\\(\\varvec{\\Lambda }\\)</span>, Generalized Chaplygin Gas (GCG), and K-essence. Each model includes an interaction rate <span>\\(\\varvec{\\Gamma }\\)</span> to quantify energy density transfer between dark energy and matter. Among them, GCG coupled with an interaction term shows promising agreement with the observed TT power spectrum, particularly for <span>\\(\\varvec{\\ell &lt;70}\\)</span>, when <span>\\(\\varvec{\\Gamma }\\)</span> falls within a specific range. The K-essence model (<span>\\(\\varvec{\\Gamma \\le 0.1}\\)</span>) is more sensitive to <span>\\(\\varvec{\\Gamma }\\)</span> due to its non-canonical kinetic term, while GCG (<span>\\(\\varvec{\\Gamma \\ge 1.02}\\)</span>) and the time-varying <span>\\(\\varvec{\\Lambda }\\)</span> (<span>\\(\\varvec{\\Gamma \\le 0.01}\\)</span>) models are less sensitive, as they involve different parameterizations. We then derive a general condition when the non-canonical scalar field <span>\\(\\varvec{\\phi }\\)</span> (with a kinetic term <span>\\(\\varvec{X}^{\\varvec{n}}\\)</span>) interacts with GCG. This has not been investigated in general form before. We find that current observational constraints on IDEs suggest a unified scalar field with a balanced regime, where it mimics quintessence behavior at <span>\\(\\varvec{n&lt;1}\\)</span> and phantom behavior at <span>\\(\\varvec{n&gt;1}\\)</span>. We outline a strong need to consider alternative explanations and fewer parameter dependencies while addressing potential interactions in the dark sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":597,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Theoretical Physics","volume":"63 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Theoretical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-024-05794-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative dark energy models were proposed to address the limitation of the standard concordance model. Though different phenomenological considerations of such models are widely studied, scenarios where they interact with each other remain unexplored. In this context, we study interacting dark energy scenarios (IDEs), incorporating alternative dark energy models. The three models that are considered in this study are time-varying \(\varvec{\Lambda }\), Generalized Chaplygin Gas (GCG), and K-essence. Each model includes an interaction rate \(\varvec{\Gamma }\) to quantify energy density transfer between dark energy and matter. Among them, GCG coupled with an interaction term shows promising agreement with the observed TT power spectrum, particularly for \(\varvec{\ell <70}\), when \(\varvec{\Gamma }\) falls within a specific range. The K-essence model (\(\varvec{\Gamma \le 0.1}\)) is more sensitive to \(\varvec{\Gamma }\) due to its non-canonical kinetic term, while GCG (\(\varvec{\Gamma \ge 1.02}\)) and the time-varying \(\varvec{\Lambda }\) (\(\varvec{\Gamma \le 0.01}\)) models are less sensitive, as they involve different parameterizations. We then derive a general condition when the non-canonical scalar field \(\varvec{\phi }\) (with a kinetic term \(\varvec{X}^{\varvec{n}}\)) interacts with GCG. This has not been investigated in general form before. We find that current observational constraints on IDEs suggest a unified scalar field with a balanced regime, where it mimics quintessence behavior at \(\varvec{n<1}\) and phantom behavior at \(\varvec{n>1}\). We outline a strong need to consider alternative explanations and fewer parameter dependencies while addressing potential interactions in the dark sector.

Abstract Image

相互作用的暗能量及其对统一暗区的影响
为了解决标准协和模型的局限性,人们提出了其他暗能量模型。尽管对这些模型的不同现象学考虑已被广泛研究,但它们之间相互作用的情景仍未被探索。在此背景下,我们研究了包含替代暗能量模型的相互作用暗能量情景(IDEs)。本研究考虑的三种模型是时变(\varvec{Lambda }\)、广义查普利金气体(GCG)和K-essence。每个模型都包括一个相互作用率(\(\varvec\{Gamma }\ )来量化暗能量和物质之间的能量密度转移。其中,当\(\varvec{\ell <70}\)落在特定范围内时,GCG加上相互作用项与观测到的TT功率谱显示出良好的一致性,尤其是\(\varvec{\ell <70}\)。K-essence 模型 (\(\varvec{\Gamma \le 0.1}\))对 \(\varvec{\Gamma }\) 更敏感,因为它的动力学项是不规范的,而 GCG (\(\varvec{\Gamma \ge 1.02})和时变的(\(\varvec{\Lambda }\) (\(\varvec{\Gamma \le 0.01}))模型不那么敏感,因为它们涉及不同的参数化。然后,我们推导出非经典标量场(带有动力学项)与 GCG 发生相互作用时的一般条件。这在以前还没有以一般形式进行过研究。我们发现,目前对IDE的观测约束表明,一个统一的标量场具有平衡机制,它在\(\varvec{n<1}\)处模仿五重行为,在\(\varvec{n>1}\)处模仿幻影行为。我们概述了在解决暗部门潜在相互作用的同时,考虑替代解释和更少的参数依赖性的强烈需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Theoretical Physics publishes original research and reviews in theoretical physics and neighboring fields. Dedicated to the unification of the latest physics research, this journal seeks to map the direction of future research by original work in traditional physics like general relativity, quantum theory with relativistic quantum field theory,as used in particle physics, and by fresh inquiry into quantum measurement theory, and other similarly fundamental areas, e.g. quantum geometry and quantum logic, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信