Assessment of Meteorological Drought in a Changing Environment: An Example in the Upper Yangtze River

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Jiaju Shen, Hanbo Yang, Ziwei Liu, Changming Li, Sien Li, Yaokui Cui, Dawen Yang
{"title":"Assessment of Meteorological Drought in a Changing Environment: An Example in the Upper Yangtze River","authors":"Jiaju Shen,&nbsp;Hanbo Yang,&nbsp;Ziwei Liu,&nbsp;Changming Li,&nbsp;Sien Li,&nbsp;Yaokui Cui,&nbsp;Dawen Yang","doi":"10.1029/2024JD041019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Recent studies have suggested that drought projections using Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) and standardized evapotranspiration precipitation index (SPEI) may overestimate drought severity. This overestimation occurs because the potential evapotranspiration (PET) calculations fail to consider the interactive effects of vegetation responses such as increased leaf area index (LAI) and constrained stomatal conductance, which are influenced by elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations ([CO<sub>2</sub>]). To address this issue, our study replaced the traditional Penman-Monteith (PM) equation with a recently proposed PET equation that includes the effects of changing [CO<sub>2</sub>] and LAI to assess droughts at monthly scale in the Upper Yangtze River basin, which experiences the vegetation greening. The findings indicated a consistent increasing trend in drought conditions with minimal discrepancy between the two equations over the historical period (1986–2017). This consistency arises because the water-saving effects of increased [CO<sub>2</sub>] and the greening effects of rising LAI largely counterbalance each other. However, for the future period (2018–2100), projections using PM equation predicted an intensification of drought conditions. In contrast, the improved SPEI indicated no significant drought variations, and the improved PDSI suggested a wetting trend. This divergence can be attributed to the water-saving effects increasingly outweighing the greening effects, as PET shows a decreasing sensitivity to LAI with LAI increasing, but maintains a near-constant sensitivity to elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Consequently, the indices based on PM equation tend to overestimate future drought severity. Overall, this study demonstrates that the new PET estimation method is more capable of responding to the changing environment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"129 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that drought projections using Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) and standardized evapotranspiration precipitation index (SPEI) may overestimate drought severity. This overestimation occurs because the potential evapotranspiration (PET) calculations fail to consider the interactive effects of vegetation responses such as increased leaf area index (LAI) and constrained stomatal conductance, which are influenced by elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations ([CO2]). To address this issue, our study replaced the traditional Penman-Monteith (PM) equation with a recently proposed PET equation that includes the effects of changing [CO2] and LAI to assess droughts at monthly scale in the Upper Yangtze River basin, which experiences the vegetation greening. The findings indicated a consistent increasing trend in drought conditions with minimal discrepancy between the two equations over the historical period (1986–2017). This consistency arises because the water-saving effects of increased [CO2] and the greening effects of rising LAI largely counterbalance each other. However, for the future period (2018–2100), projections using PM equation predicted an intensification of drought conditions. In contrast, the improved SPEI indicated no significant drought variations, and the improved PDSI suggested a wetting trend. This divergence can be attributed to the water-saving effects increasingly outweighing the greening effects, as PET shows a decreasing sensitivity to LAI with LAI increasing, but maintains a near-constant sensitivity to elevated [CO2]. Consequently, the indices based on PM equation tend to overestimate future drought severity. Overall, this study demonstrates that the new PET estimation method is more capable of responding to the changing environment.

变化环境中的气象干旱评估:以长江上游为例
最近的研究表明,使用帕尔默干旱严重程度指数(PDSI)和标准化蒸散降水指数(SPEI)进行干旱预测可能会高估干旱的严重程度。出现这种高估的原因是潜在蒸散量(PET)计算未能考虑植被反应的交互作用,如叶面积指数(LAI)增加和气孔导度受限,而这些都受到大气二氧化碳浓度([CO2])升高的影响。为了解决这个问题,我们的研究用最近提出的 PET 方程取代了传统的彭曼-蒙蒂斯(PM)方程,该方程包含了[CO2]和 LAI 变化的影响,用于评估长江上游流域月尺度干旱。研究结果表明,在历史时期(1986-2017 年)内,干旱状况呈持续上升趋势,两个方程之间的差异极小。这种一致性是由于[CO2]增加的节水效应和 LAI 上升的绿化效应在很大程度上相互抵消。然而,在未来时期(2018-2100 年),使用 PM 方程预测的干旱状况会加剧。与此相反,改进的 SPEI 没有显示出明显的干旱变化,而改进的 PDSI 则显示出湿润趋势。这种差异可归因于节水效应日益超过绿化效应,因为随着 LAI 的增加,PET 对 LAI 的敏感度下降,但对升高的[CO2]的敏感度几乎保持不变。因此,基于 PM 方程的指数往往会高估未来干旱的严重程度。总之,这项研究表明,新的 PET 估算方法更能应对不断变化的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信