Resources for action and organizational resilience in times of COVID-19: A study in health care

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Angela Weber Righi, Priscila Wachs, Natália Ransolin, Vanessa Becker Bertoni
{"title":"Resources for action and organizational resilience in times of COVID-19: A study in health care","authors":"Angela Weber Righi,&nbsp;Priscila Wachs,&nbsp;Natália Ransolin,&nbsp;Vanessa Becker Bertoni","doi":"10.1002/hfm.21045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic challenged health care organizations to cope with major disruptions, especially in the first waves. Several investigations were undertaken to understand how to support resilience during similar unexpected events. In this study, we attempted to unveil the resilient performance of health care organizations during the first waves of the COVID-19 pandemic from the viewpoint of resources for action. Thus, the research objectives are twofold: (i) to evaluate organizational resilience in facing COVID-19 by hospitals in Brazil and (ii) to evaluate the relationship between resources for action and resilient performance. Firstly, an online survey was sent to front-line health care workers, resulting in 111 responses. Then, a questerview was undertaken through online interviews with some participants of the previous phase. Resources for action were interpreted as five aspects supporting decision-making in health care organizations: information and communication; team, equipment, and tools; standard operating procedure (SOP); training; and built environment. Each resource was then unfolded based on the four potentials for resilient performance (i.e., anticipate, monitor, respond and learn). Respondents strongly agreed that their institutions are resilient (<i>M</i> = 4.15; standard deviation [SD] = 0.91). The potentials to learn (<i>M</i> = 4.23; SD = 0.96) and respond (<i>M</i> = 4.08; SD = 1.02) stood out, followed by monitoring (<i>M</i> = 3.85; SD = 1.07) and anticipating (<i>M</i> = 3.70; SD = 1.11). Although some differences stand out, findings corroborate with the joint performance of the resources for action to support resilience performance. Information and communication were the most present among the resources for action (<i>M</i> = 4.20). Making resources for action visible is a strategy for designing resilient systems, as it can be considered a bridge linking different resilience levels (micro, meso, and macro). Suggestions for future studies point out the need to promote the development and evaluation of resources for action in health care institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"34 6","pages":"516-526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.21045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.21045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic challenged health care organizations to cope with major disruptions, especially in the first waves. Several investigations were undertaken to understand how to support resilience during similar unexpected events. In this study, we attempted to unveil the resilient performance of health care organizations during the first waves of the COVID-19 pandemic from the viewpoint of resources for action. Thus, the research objectives are twofold: (i) to evaluate organizational resilience in facing COVID-19 by hospitals in Brazil and (ii) to evaluate the relationship between resources for action and resilient performance. Firstly, an online survey was sent to front-line health care workers, resulting in 111 responses. Then, a questerview was undertaken through online interviews with some participants of the previous phase. Resources for action were interpreted as five aspects supporting decision-making in health care organizations: information and communication; team, equipment, and tools; standard operating procedure (SOP); training; and built environment. Each resource was then unfolded based on the four potentials for resilient performance (i.e., anticipate, monitor, respond and learn). Respondents strongly agreed that their institutions are resilient (M = 4.15; standard deviation [SD] = 0.91). The potentials to learn (M = 4.23; SD = 0.96) and respond (M = 4.08; SD = 1.02) stood out, followed by monitoring (M = 3.85; SD = 1.07) and anticipating (M = 3.70; SD = 1.11). Although some differences stand out, findings corroborate with the joint performance of the resources for action to support resilience performance. Information and communication were the most present among the resources for action (M = 4.20). Making resources for action visible is a strategy for designing resilient systems, as it can be considered a bridge linking different resilience levels (micro, meso, and macro). Suggestions for future studies point out the need to promote the development and evaluation of resources for action in health care institutions.

Abstract Image

COVID-19时期的行动资源和组织复原力:医疗保健研究
COVID-19 大流行对医疗机构应对重大干扰提出了挑战,尤其是在第一波。为了了解如何在类似的突发事件中支持抗灾能力,我们开展了多项调查。在本研究中,我们试图从行动资源的角度揭示医疗机构在 COVID-19 大流行的第一波中的抗灾表现。因此,研究目标有两个:(i) 评估巴西医院在面对 COVID-19 时的组织复原力;(ii) 评估行动资源与复原力表现之间的关系。首先,向一线医护人员发送了一份在线调查,共收到 111 份回复。然后,通过在线访谈对前一阶段的部分参与者进行了问卷调查。行动资源被解释为支持医疗机构决策的五个方面:信息和沟通;团队、设备和工具;标准操作程序(SOP);培训;以及建筑环境。然后,根据弹性绩效的四种潜力(即预测、监测、响应和学习)对每种资源进行了展开。受访者非常认同其机构具有复原力(M = 4.15;标准差 [SD] = 0.91)。学习潜力(M = 4.23;标准差 = 0.96)和应对潜力(M = 4.08;标准差 = 1.02)最为突出,其次是监测潜力(M = 3.85;标准差 = 1.07)和预测潜力(M = 3.70;标准差 = 1.11)。尽管存在一些差异,但研究结果与支持抗灾能力的行动资源的共同表现相吻合。在行动资源中,信息和交流的作用最大(中值 = 4.20)。使行动资源可见是设计抗灾系统的一种策略,因为它可以被视为连接不同抗灾水平(微观、中观和宏观)的桥梁。对未来研究的建议指出,有必要促进医疗机构行动资源的开发和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信