Antigone or the Right to Kill: Making Noise As Resistance

Dana Papachristou
{"title":"Antigone or the Right to Kill: Making Noise As Resistance","authors":"Dana Papachristou","doi":"10.1002/fhu2.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article delves into the relation between the terms <i>social dissonance</i>, <i>necropolitics</i> and Sophocles' tragedy, Antigone. By attempting an interdisciplinary analysis and by bringing together elements of sound studies, political theory and classical literature, I will explore the contemporary dynamics between social dissonance, necropolitics and resistance. The key point is that beyond contemporary contexts or rather recent modernity, resistance to the authoritarian volition can be understood metaphorically as noise within a context of a wider social dissonance arrangement. While examining Antigone's defiance in the face of oppressive power, we are reminded of the individuals striving for justice and autonomy in the face of oppressive systems, as resistance to generalized capitalism prevailing positivity and appropriation. By juxtaposing the sociopolitical context in which Sophocles wrote Antigone and various manifestations of necropolitics in our times, this article explores the relevance of the play in today's ubiquitous surveillance and subjugation. Moreover, it emphasises the significance of the term 'social dissonance', as proposed by Mattin, in understanding the responses towards power struggles and forms of resistance. The collision of these concepts occurs, here, in their shared focus on power dynamics and resistance against oppressive systems: it explores the ways in which power operates, so as to control and manipulate individuals and communities, creating conditions of voluntary servitude and subjugation. As this analysis emphasises the potential for resistance, these terms can serve as a framework to challenge dominant narratives. When examining the intersection of <i>necropolitics and social dissonance</i>, we can explore how the exercise of necropolitical strategies leads to oppression by silencing dissent, suppressing alternative narratives and perpetuating oppressive structures. Silence is metaphorically seen here as a system of perpetuating power, subordinating resistance and ultimately, incorporating noise into the capitalist narrative. The clash between the dominant necropolitical regime and the underlying resistance exposes the tension and contradictions within society, laying the foundation for social movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":100563,"journal":{"name":"Future Humanities","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fhu2.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fhu2.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article delves into the relation between the terms social dissonance, necropolitics and Sophocles' tragedy, Antigone. By attempting an interdisciplinary analysis and by bringing together elements of sound studies, political theory and classical literature, I will explore the contemporary dynamics between social dissonance, necropolitics and resistance. The key point is that beyond contemporary contexts or rather recent modernity, resistance to the authoritarian volition can be understood metaphorically as noise within a context of a wider social dissonance arrangement. While examining Antigone's defiance in the face of oppressive power, we are reminded of the individuals striving for justice and autonomy in the face of oppressive systems, as resistance to generalized capitalism prevailing positivity and appropriation. By juxtaposing the sociopolitical context in which Sophocles wrote Antigone and various manifestations of necropolitics in our times, this article explores the relevance of the play in today's ubiquitous surveillance and subjugation. Moreover, it emphasises the significance of the term 'social dissonance', as proposed by Mattin, in understanding the responses towards power struggles and forms of resistance. The collision of these concepts occurs, here, in their shared focus on power dynamics and resistance against oppressive systems: it explores the ways in which power operates, so as to control and manipulate individuals and communities, creating conditions of voluntary servitude and subjugation. As this analysis emphasises the potential for resistance, these terms can serve as a framework to challenge dominant narratives. When examining the intersection of necropolitics and social dissonance, we can explore how the exercise of necropolitical strategies leads to oppression by silencing dissent, suppressing alternative narratives and perpetuating oppressive structures. Silence is metaphorically seen here as a system of perpetuating power, subordinating resistance and ultimately, incorporating noise into the capitalist narrative. The clash between the dominant necropolitical regime and the underlying resistance exposes the tension and contradictions within society, laying the foundation for social movements.

安提戈涅或杀人的权利制造噪音作为抵抗
本文深入探讨了社会失谐、亡灵政治学和索福克勒斯的悲剧《安提戈涅》之间的关系。通过尝试跨学科分析,并结合声音研究、政治理论和古典文学的元素,我将探讨社会失调、死亡政治学和反抗之间的当代动态关系。关键在于,超越当代语境,或者说超越近代现代性,对专制意志的反抗可以被隐喻地理解为更广泛的社会不和谐安排背景下的噪音。在审视安提戈涅面对压迫性权力的反抗时,我们会联想到个人在压迫性制度面前为正义和自主而奋斗,这是对普遍资本主义盛行的积极性和占有性的反抗。通过将索福克勒斯创作《安提戈涅》的社会政治背景与我们时代各种表现形式的亡灵政治并置,本文探讨了该剧在当今无处不在的监视和征服中的现实意义。此外,文章还强调了马廷(Mattin)提出的 "社会失谐 "一词在理解权力斗争的反应和反抗形式方面的意义。在这里,这些概念的碰撞发生在它们对权力动态和反抗压迫制度的共同关注上:它探讨了权力运作的方式,从而控制和操纵个人和社区,创造自愿奴役和征服的条件。由于这种分析强调了反抗的可能性,这些术语可以作为挑战主流叙事的框架。在研究亡灵政治与社会失调的交叉点时,我们可以探讨亡灵政治策略的实施如何通过压制异议、压制替代性叙事和延续压迫性结构而导致压迫。在这里,沉默被隐喻为一种延续权力、压制反抗并最终将噪音纳入资本主义叙事的系统。占主导地位的死亡政治制度与潜在的反抗之间的冲突暴露了社会内部的紧张和矛盾,为社会运动奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信