Reservoir-based flood forecasting and warning: deep learning versus machine learning

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Sooyeon Yi, Jaeeung Yi
{"title":"Reservoir-based flood forecasting and warning: deep learning versus machine learning","authors":"Sooyeon Yi,&nbsp;Jaeeung Yi","doi":"10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to increasing flood risks driven by the climate crisis, urban areas require advanced forecasting and informed decision-making to support sustainable development. This study seeks to improve the reliability of reservoir-based flood forecasting and ensure adequate lead time for effective response measures. The main objectives are to predict hourly downstream flood discharge at a reference point, compare discharge predictions from a single reservoir with a four-hour lead time against those from three reservoirs with a seven-hour lead time, and evaluate the accuracy of data-driven approaches. The study takes place in the Han River Basin, located in Seoul, South Korea. Approaches include two non-deep learning (NDL) (random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR)) and two deep learning (DL) (long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU)). Scenario 1 incorporates data from three reservoirs, while Scenario 2 focuses solely on Paldang reservoir. Results show that RF performed 4.03% (in <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) better than SVR, while GRU performed 4.69% (in <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) better than LSTM in Scenario 1. In Scenario 2, none of the models showed any outstanding performance. Based on these findings, we propose a two-step reservoir-based approach: Initial predictions should utilize models for three upstream reservoirs with long lead time, while closer to the event, the model should focus on a single reservoir with more accurate prediction. This work stands as a significant contribution, making accurate and well-timed predictions for the local administrations to issue flood warnings and execute evacuations to mitigate flood damage and casualties in urban areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to increasing flood risks driven by the climate crisis, urban areas require advanced forecasting and informed decision-making to support sustainable development. This study seeks to improve the reliability of reservoir-based flood forecasting and ensure adequate lead time for effective response measures. The main objectives are to predict hourly downstream flood discharge at a reference point, compare discharge predictions from a single reservoir with a four-hour lead time against those from three reservoirs with a seven-hour lead time, and evaluate the accuracy of data-driven approaches. The study takes place in the Han River Basin, located in Seoul, South Korea. Approaches include two non-deep learning (NDL) (random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR)) and two deep learning (DL) (long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU)). Scenario 1 incorporates data from three reservoirs, while Scenario 2 focuses solely on Paldang reservoir. Results show that RF performed 4.03% (in R2) better than SVR, while GRU performed 4.69% (in R2) better than LSTM in Scenario 1. In Scenario 2, none of the models showed any outstanding performance. Based on these findings, we propose a two-step reservoir-based approach: Initial predictions should utilize models for three upstream reservoirs with long lead time, while closer to the event, the model should focus on a single reservoir with more accurate prediction. This work stands as a significant contribution, making accurate and well-timed predictions for the local administrations to issue flood warnings and execute evacuations to mitigate flood damage and casualties in urban areas.

Abstract Image

基于水库的洪水预报和预警:深度学习与机器学习
为应对气候危机导致的日益增加的洪水风险,城市地区需要先进的预报和明智的决策,以支持可持续发展。本研究旨在提高基于水库的洪水预报的可靠性,确保有足够的准备时间采取有效的应对措施。主要目标是预测参考点的每小时下游泄洪量,比较一座水库在 4 小时准备时间内的泄洪预测与三座水库在 7 小时准备时间内的泄洪预测,并评估数据驱动方法的准确性。研究地点位于韩国首尔的汉江流域。方法包括两种非深度学习 (NDL)(随机森林 (RF)、支持向量回归 (SVR))和两种深度学习 (DL)(长短期记忆 (LSTM)、门控递归单元 (GRU))。方案 1 结合了三个水库的数据,而方案 2 则只关注帕尔当水库。结果表明,在情景 1 中,RF 的性能(R2)比 SVR 高 4.03%,而 GRU 的性能(R2)比 LSTM 高 4.69%。在情景 2 中,没有一个模型表现出突出的性能。基于这些发现,我们提出了一种基于水库的两步法:最初的预测应利用三个上游水库的模型,提前期较长,而在临近事件发生时,模型应专注于单个水库,预测更准确。这项工作是一项重大贡献,为地方政府发布洪水预警和实施疏散提供了准确及时的预测,从而减轻了洪水对城市地区造成的破坏和人员伤亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信