Comparison of emulsion and spray methods for fabrication of rapamycin-loaded acetalated dextran microparticles†

Stephen A. Ehrenzeller, Nicole Rose Lukesh, Rebeca T. Stiepel, Denzel D. Middleton, Steven M. Nuzzolo, Aliyah J. Tate, Cole J. Batty, Eric M. Bachelder and Kristy M. Ainslie
{"title":"Comparison of emulsion and spray methods for fabrication of rapamycin-loaded acetalated dextran microparticles†","authors":"Stephen A. Ehrenzeller, Nicole Rose Lukesh, Rebeca T. Stiepel, Denzel D. Middleton, Steven M. Nuzzolo, Aliyah J. Tate, Cole J. Batty, Eric M. Bachelder and Kristy M. Ainslie","doi":"10.1039/D4PM00054D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Rapamycin (rapa), an immunosuppressive medication, has demonstrated considerable effectiveness in reducing organ transplant rejection and treating select autoimmune diseases. However, the standard oral administration of rapa results in poor bioavailability, broad biodistribution, and harmful off-target effects, necessitating improved drug delivery formulations. Polymeric microparticles (MPs) are one such solution and have demonstrated promise in pre-clinical studies to improve the therapeutic efficacy of rapa. Nevertheless, MP formulations are highly diverse, and fabrication method selection is a critical consideration in formulation design. Herein, we compared common fabrication processes for the development of rapa-loaded MPs. Using the biopolymer acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX), rapa-loaded MPs were fabricated by both emulsion (homogenization and sonication) and spray (electrospray and spray drying) methods, and resultant MPs were characterized for size, morphology, surface charge, and drug release kinetics. MPs were then screened in LPS-stimulated macrophages to gauge immunosuppressive efficacy relative to soluble drug. We determined that homogenized MPs possessed the most optimal combination of sizing, tunable drug release kinetics, and immunosuppressive efficacy, and we subsequently demonstrated that these characteristics were maintained across a range of potential rapa loadings. Further, we performed <em>in vivo</em> trafficking studies to evaluate depot kinetics and cellular uptake at the injection site after subcutaneous injection of homogenized MPs. We observed preferential MP uptake by dendritic cells at the depot, highlighting the potential for MPs to direct more targeted drug delivery. Our results emphasize the significance of fabrication method in modulating the efficacy of MP systems and inform improved formulation design for the delivery of rapa.</p>","PeriodicalId":101141,"journal":{"name":"RSC Pharmaceutics","volume":" 4","pages":" 727-741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/pm/d4pm00054d?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/pm/d4pm00054d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapamycin (rapa), an immunosuppressive medication, has demonstrated considerable effectiveness in reducing organ transplant rejection and treating select autoimmune diseases. However, the standard oral administration of rapa results in poor bioavailability, broad biodistribution, and harmful off-target effects, necessitating improved drug delivery formulations. Polymeric microparticles (MPs) are one such solution and have demonstrated promise in pre-clinical studies to improve the therapeutic efficacy of rapa. Nevertheless, MP formulations are highly diverse, and fabrication method selection is a critical consideration in formulation design. Herein, we compared common fabrication processes for the development of rapa-loaded MPs. Using the biopolymer acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX), rapa-loaded MPs were fabricated by both emulsion (homogenization and sonication) and spray (electrospray and spray drying) methods, and resultant MPs were characterized for size, morphology, surface charge, and drug release kinetics. MPs were then screened in LPS-stimulated macrophages to gauge immunosuppressive efficacy relative to soluble drug. We determined that homogenized MPs possessed the most optimal combination of sizing, tunable drug release kinetics, and immunosuppressive efficacy, and we subsequently demonstrated that these characteristics were maintained across a range of potential rapa loadings. Further, we performed in vivo trafficking studies to evaluate depot kinetics and cellular uptake at the injection site after subcutaneous injection of homogenized MPs. We observed preferential MP uptake by dendritic cells at the depot, highlighting the potential for MPs to direct more targeted drug delivery. Our results emphasize the significance of fabrication method in modulating the efficacy of MP systems and inform improved formulation design for the delivery of rapa.

Abstract Image

比较乳液法和喷雾法制造雷帕霉素载体乙缩醛葡聚糖微颗粒†。
雷帕霉素(rapa)是一种免疫抑制药物,在减少器官移植排斥反应和治疗某些自身免疫性疾病方面已显示出相当大的疗效。然而,雷帕霉素的标准口服给药方式导致生物利用度低、生物分布广以及有害的脱靶效应,因此有必要改进给药配方。聚合微粒(MPs)就是这样一种解决方案,在临床前研究中已证明其有望改善鸦胆子碱的疗效。然而,MP 制剂种类繁多,制备方法的选择是制剂设计的关键因素。在此,我们比较了开发鸦片豚草载药 MPs 的常见制备工艺。我们使用生物聚合物乙缩醛葡聚糖(Ace-DEX),通过乳化法(均质化和超声)和喷雾法(电喷雾和喷雾干燥)制备了鸦片豚草载药 MPs,并对制备的 MPs 的尺寸、形态、表面电荷和药物释放动力学进行了表征。然后在 LPS 刺激的巨噬细胞中对 MPs 进行筛选,以衡量其相对于可溶性药物的免疫抑制功效。我们确定匀浆 MPs 在大小、可调药物释放动力学和免疫抑制功效方面具有最佳组合,随后我们证明这些特性在一系列潜在的 rapa 负载中都能保持。此外,我们还进行了体内运输研究,以评估皮下注射均质化 MPs 后注射部位的储藏动力学和细胞摄取情况。我们观察到树突状细胞优先摄取注射部位的 MP,这突显了 MPs 引导更有针对性的药物输送的潜力。我们的研究结果强调了制造方法在调节 MP 系统药效方面的重要意义,并为改进雷帕的给药配方设计提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信