Jinwei Fu , Hadi Haeri , Vahab Sarfarazi , Amin Rahmani , Parastou Salehipour , Abdollah Tabaroei , Lin Jian Shangguan
{"title":"Investigating tensile failure mechanisms of layered rocks through physical testing and PFC3D analysis","authors":"Jinwei Fu , Hadi Haeri , Vahab Sarfarazi , Amin Rahmani , Parastou Salehipour , Abdollah Tabaroei , Lin Jian Shangguan","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rocks generally exhibit less resistance to tension compared to shear or compression forces, and tension cracks often precede shear or compression failures. While the mechanical performance of rock layers under compression has been widely described, their tensile behavior is less known.</div><div>The current study includes experimental approaches as well as computational testing with the three-dimensional Particle Flow Code (PFC3D) to evaluate the effect of layer thickness and mechanical parameters on the strength and failure patterns of layered rocks-like materials under continuous tension.</div><div>The Brazilian tensile strength test was conducted on concrete and gypsum specimens. The concrete specimen measured 54 mm in diameter and 27 mm in thickness, resulting in a tensile strength of 1.35 MPa. The gypsum specimen, with the same measurements, had a tensile strength of 0.6 MPa. In addition, uniaxial compressive strength tests were performed on both materials, yielding compressive strengths of 18 MPa for concrete and 6 MPa for gypsum. Our findings indicate that layer thickness and mechanical properties considerably influence failure patterns, tensile strength, and progressive deformation of these materials. The failure modes seen in the layered specimens indicate that the tensile strength ascertained by numerical testing and direct tensile testing is equally accurate. Both the empirical and computational findings are in accordance with the analytical predictions of the failure criterion. In rock engineering, these failure criteria have a high degree of accuracy when it comes to predicting tensile strength and reflecting the failure modes of layered rocks, like layered sandstone, slate, and shale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 110541"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424007045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rocks generally exhibit less resistance to tension compared to shear or compression forces, and tension cracks often precede shear or compression failures. While the mechanical performance of rock layers under compression has been widely described, their tensile behavior is less known.
The current study includes experimental approaches as well as computational testing with the three-dimensional Particle Flow Code (PFC3D) to evaluate the effect of layer thickness and mechanical parameters on the strength and failure patterns of layered rocks-like materials under continuous tension.
The Brazilian tensile strength test was conducted on concrete and gypsum specimens. The concrete specimen measured 54 mm in diameter and 27 mm in thickness, resulting in a tensile strength of 1.35 MPa. The gypsum specimen, with the same measurements, had a tensile strength of 0.6 MPa. In addition, uniaxial compressive strength tests were performed on both materials, yielding compressive strengths of 18 MPa for concrete and 6 MPa for gypsum. Our findings indicate that layer thickness and mechanical properties considerably influence failure patterns, tensile strength, and progressive deformation of these materials. The failure modes seen in the layered specimens indicate that the tensile strength ascertained by numerical testing and direct tensile testing is equally accurate. Both the empirical and computational findings are in accordance with the analytical predictions of the failure criterion. In rock engineering, these failure criteria have a high degree of accuracy when it comes to predicting tensile strength and reflecting the failure modes of layered rocks, like layered sandstone, slate, and shale.
期刊介绍:
EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.