Electrical resistivity tomography of simulated graves with buried human and pig remains

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Katrina Cristino , Kennedy O. Doro , Aidan Armstrong , Shari Forbes , Agathe Ribéreau-Gayon , Carl-Georg Bank
{"title":"Electrical resistivity tomography of simulated graves with buried human and pig remains","authors":"Katrina Cristino ,&nbsp;Kennedy O. Doro ,&nbsp;Aidan Armstrong ,&nbsp;Shari Forbes ,&nbsp;Agathe Ribéreau-Gayon ,&nbsp;Carl-Georg Bank","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rigorous field assessment in different soil types and climates comparing simulated graves with pig remains and human remains are needed to assess the capabilities and limitations of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) as a tool to search for unmarked graves. Our study assesses the ERT signals from graves with pig and human remains in a cold, humid continental climate with sandy soils. Two sets of three experimental graves were established: the first set consisted of two graves containing human remains and an empty grave serving as a control, while the second set consisted of two graves with pig remains and a second empty grave. ERT measurements were conducted prior to establishing the graves and were repeated 10 times over seventeen months, except for winter months when measurements were impossible. Each time we acquired eight 18 m long ERT transects using a dipole-dipole electrode array with a unit electrode spacing of 0.5 m and the transects spaced 1 m apart. The measured electrical resistivity decreased for all graves by 14–22 % for measurements conducted up to two months after burial. No further decrease was observed in the control, while resistivity in the graves with human and pig remains continued to decrease by 45–52 % up to the end of our study, seventeen months after burial. The resistivity anomaly in the pig graves shows a contrasting anomaly that is broader than that of the human remains. Our study thus validates the sensitivity of ERT to graves in cold, humid climates with sandy soil.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"364 ","pages":"Article 112248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037907382400330X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rigorous field assessment in different soil types and climates comparing simulated graves with pig remains and human remains are needed to assess the capabilities and limitations of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) as a tool to search for unmarked graves. Our study assesses the ERT signals from graves with pig and human remains in a cold, humid continental climate with sandy soils. Two sets of three experimental graves were established: the first set consisted of two graves containing human remains and an empty grave serving as a control, while the second set consisted of two graves with pig remains and a second empty grave. ERT measurements were conducted prior to establishing the graves and were repeated 10 times over seventeen months, except for winter months when measurements were impossible. Each time we acquired eight 18 m long ERT transects using a dipole-dipole electrode array with a unit electrode spacing of 0.5 m and the transects spaced 1 m apart. The measured electrical resistivity decreased for all graves by 14–22 % for measurements conducted up to two months after burial. No further decrease was observed in the control, while resistivity in the graves with human and pig remains continued to decrease by 45–52 % up to the end of our study, seventeen months after burial. The resistivity anomaly in the pig graves shows a contrasting anomaly that is broader than that of the human remains. Our study thus validates the sensitivity of ERT to graves in cold, humid climates with sandy soil.
对埋有人类和猪遗骸的模拟坟墓进行电阻断层扫描
需要在不同的土壤类型和气候条件下进行严格的实地评估,比较猪遗骸和人类遗骸的模拟坟墓,以评估电阻率断层扫描(ERT)作为无标记坟墓搜索工具的能力和局限性。我们的研究评估了在寒冷、潮湿的大陆性气候和沙质土壤中埋有猪和人类遗骸的坟墓的电阻率层析信号。我们建立了两组三个实验墓穴:第一组包括两个埋有人类遗骸的墓穴和一个作为对照的空墓穴,第二组包括两个埋有猪遗骸的墓穴和第二个空墓穴。在建立坟墓之前,我们进行了 ERT 测量,并在 17 个月内重复测量了 10 次,但冬季无法测量时除外。每次我们使用偶极-偶极电极阵列采集 8 个 18 米长的 ERT 断面,单位电极间距为 0.5 米,断面间距为 1 米。在埋葬两个月后进行的测量中,所有墓穴的电阻率都下降了 14-22%。对照组的电阻率没有进一步下降,而在埋葬了人和猪遗骸的坟墓中,电阻率继续下降了 45-52%,直到我们的研究结束,即埋葬后 17 个月。猪墓中的电阻率异常显示出一种对比异常,比人类遗骸的异常更广泛。因此,我们的研究验证了 ERT 对寒冷潮湿的沙质土壤中的坟墓的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信