Efficacy of medications for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD): A systematic review and meta-analysis considering baseline AUD severity

IF 9.1 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Roberta Agabio , Hugo Lopez-Pelayo , Pol Bruguera , San-Yuan Huang , Salvatore Sardo , Marta Pecina , Evgeny M. Krupitsky , Garrett M. Fitzmaurice , Zhicheng Lin
{"title":"Efficacy of medications for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD): A systematic review and meta-analysis considering baseline AUD severity","authors":"Roberta Agabio ,&nbsp;Hugo Lopez-Pelayo ,&nbsp;Pol Bruguera ,&nbsp;San-Yuan Huang ,&nbsp;Salvatore Sardo ,&nbsp;Marta Pecina ,&nbsp;Evgeny M. Krupitsky ,&nbsp;Garrett M. Fitzmaurice ,&nbsp;Zhicheng Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Baseline severity of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is an influencing factor in the response to medications recommended for the treatment of AUD. The scarce efficacy of AUD medications partly justifies their limited uses. We were interested in evaluating the efficacy of approved and recommended AUD medications using generic inverse-variance, an analysis facilitating comparison between medications and placebo both at the end of the study and, concomitantly, to baseline values for the same participants. We conducted a systematic review to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any medication to placebo providing, both at baseline and end of treatment, percent heavy drinking days (%HDD), percent drinking days (%DD), and/or drinks per drinking day (DDD). We searched PubMed, Embase, PMC, and three CT registers from inception to April 2023. A total of 79 RCTs (11,737 AUD participants; 30 different medications) were included: 47 RCTs (8465 participants) used AUD medications, and 32 RCTs (3272 participants) used other medications. At baseline, participants consumed on average approximately 12 DDD, and experienced 70 % DD, and 61 % HDD. Placebo halved or reduced these values to a third. Compared to placebo, AUD medications further reduced these outcomes (moderate to high certainty evidence). Other medications reduced the DDD without modifying other alcohol outcomes. AUD medications increased the risk of developing adverse events (high-certainty evidence). Despite the large placebo effects, our results support the benefits of providing AUD medications to people with AUD, helping them reduce alcohol consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19918,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological research","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107454"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661824003992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Baseline severity of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is an influencing factor in the response to medications recommended for the treatment of AUD. The scarce efficacy of AUD medications partly justifies their limited uses. We were interested in evaluating the efficacy of approved and recommended AUD medications using generic inverse-variance, an analysis facilitating comparison between medications and placebo both at the end of the study and, concomitantly, to baseline values for the same participants. We conducted a systematic review to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any medication to placebo providing, both at baseline and end of treatment, percent heavy drinking days (%HDD), percent drinking days (%DD), and/or drinks per drinking day (DDD). We searched PubMed, Embase, PMC, and three CT registers from inception to April 2023. A total of 79 RCTs (11,737 AUD participants; 30 different medications) were included: 47 RCTs (8465 participants) used AUD medications, and 32 RCTs (3272 participants) used other medications. At baseline, participants consumed on average approximately 12 DDD, and experienced 70 % DD, and 61 % HDD. Placebo halved or reduced these values to a third. Compared to placebo, AUD medications further reduced these outcomes (moderate to high certainty evidence). Other medications reduced the DDD without modifying other alcohol outcomes. AUD medications increased the risk of developing adverse events (high-certainty evidence). Despite the large placebo effects, our results support the benefits of providing AUD medications to people with AUD, helping them reduce alcohol consumption.
药物治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)的疗效:考虑到基线 AUD 严重程度的系统回顾和荟萃分析
酒精使用障碍(AUD)的基线严重程度是影响对推荐用于治疗 AUD 的药物反应的一个因素。治疗酒精中毒性障碍的药物疗效甚微,这在一定程度上证明了这些药物的有限使用是合理的。我们有兴趣使用通用逆方差法评估已获批准和推荐的 AUD 药物的疗效,这种分析方法便于在研究结束时比较药物和安慰剂的疗效,同时也便于比较同一参与者的基线值。我们进行了一项系统性回顾,纳入了在基线值和治疗结束值、大量饮酒天数百分比(%HDD)、饮酒天数百分比(%DDD)和/或每日饮酒量(DDD)方面对任何药物和安慰剂进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、PMC 和三个 CT 登记册,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 4 月。共纳入了 79 项 RCT(11737 名 AUD 参与者;30 种不同的药物):其中 47 项 RCT(8465 名参与者)使用了 AUD 药物,32 项 RCT(3272 名参与者)使用了其他药物。基线时,参与者平均消耗约 12 个 DDD,经历了 70% 的 DD 和 61% 的 HDD。安慰剂可将这些值减半或减至三分之一。与安慰剂相比,抗逆转录病毒药物进一步降低了这些结果(中度至高度确证)。其他药物可降低酗酒致死率,但不会改变其他酗酒结果。AUD 药物增加了发生不良事件的风险(高确定性证据)。尽管存在较大的安慰剂效应,但我们的研究结果支持为 AUD 患者提供 AUD 药物治疗,帮助他们减少饮酒量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacological research
Pharmacological research 医学-药学
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
491
审稿时长
8 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Research publishes cutting-edge articles in biomedical sciences to cover a broad range of topics that move the pharmacological field forward. Pharmacological research publishes articles on molecular, biochemical, translational, and clinical research (including clinical trials); it is proud of its rapid publication of accepted papers that comprises a dedicated, fast acceptance and publication track for high profile articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信