Toward understanding the hydrologic, ecologic and community flooding implications of coastal restoration strategies: Sediment diversions

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Ahmed M. Khalifa , Ehab A. Meselhe , Kelin Hu , Denise Reed , Rachel Rhode , Natalie L. Snider
{"title":"Toward understanding the hydrologic, ecologic and community flooding implications of coastal restoration strategies: Sediment diversions","authors":"Ahmed M. Khalifa ,&nbsp;Ehab A. Meselhe ,&nbsp;Kelin Hu ,&nbsp;Denise Reed ,&nbsp;Rachel Rhode ,&nbsp;Natalie L. Snider","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2024.108984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating the real-world impacts of proposed restoration strategies is a complex process. Typically, restoration is pursued to achieve a number of primary and secondary objectives as most coastal and deltaic areas support a variety of functions and activities with substantial social and economic values. In this analysis, we demonstrate the importance of considering the broad implications of planning and implementing restoration projects. We use a recently developed simplified and computationally efficient biophysical numerical model. The Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion, a restoration project approximately 60 km down the Mississippi River from New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, offers an opportunity to quantify the benefits and potential impacts of large-scale restoration. Operation plans of the diversion are employed in this analysis to reveal the delicate balance between its potential benefits and possible adverse effects. Evaluation metrics include net land change and landscape evolution, change in salinity and subsequent shift in the distribution of marsh types, long-term change in the hydroperiod and marsh inundation, and change in the flood risk for unique local coastal communities and culture. We also consider subaqueous basin infilling, spatial sediment deposition, and creation of shallow water areas that might be of ecological value. These metrics are evaluated collectively under a set of future scenarios capturing long-term impacts of sea level rise and subsidence. This analysis provides evidence in favor of using a multi-metric approach to holistically evaluate restoration during the planning and design phases, as well as to guide the process of adaptively managing restoration projects post construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50497,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","volume":"309 ","pages":"Article 108984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027277142400372X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating the real-world impacts of proposed restoration strategies is a complex process. Typically, restoration is pursued to achieve a number of primary and secondary objectives as most coastal and deltaic areas support a variety of functions and activities with substantial social and economic values. In this analysis, we demonstrate the importance of considering the broad implications of planning and implementing restoration projects. We use a recently developed simplified and computationally efficient biophysical numerical model. The Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion, a restoration project approximately 60 km down the Mississippi River from New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, offers an opportunity to quantify the benefits and potential impacts of large-scale restoration. Operation plans of the diversion are employed in this analysis to reveal the delicate balance between its potential benefits and possible adverse effects. Evaluation metrics include net land change and landscape evolution, change in salinity and subsequent shift in the distribution of marsh types, long-term change in the hydroperiod and marsh inundation, and change in the flood risk for unique local coastal communities and culture. We also consider subaqueous basin infilling, spatial sediment deposition, and creation of shallow water areas that might be of ecological value. These metrics are evaluated collectively under a set of future scenarios capturing long-term impacts of sea level rise and subsidence. This analysis provides evidence in favor of using a multi-metric approach to holistically evaluate restoration during the planning and design phases, as well as to guide the process of adaptively managing restoration projects post construction.
了解沿海恢复战略对水文、生态和群落洪水的影响:泥沙分流
评估拟议的恢复战略对现实世界的影响是一个复杂的过程。由于大多数沿岸和三角洲地区都支持具有重大社会和经济价值的各种功能和活动,因 此,通常要通过恢复来实现一系列主要和次要目标。在本分析中,我们证明了考虑规划和实施恢复项目的广泛影响的重要性。我们使用了最近开发的一个简化的、计算效率高的生物物理数值模型。中巴拉塔利亚沉积物分流是一个修复项目,位于美国路易斯安那州新奥尔良市密西西比河下游约 60 公里处,它为量化大规模修复项目的效益和潜在影响提供了一个机会。本分析采用了引水渠的运行计划,以揭示其潜在效益与可能的不利影响之间的微妙平衡。评估指标包括土地净变化和景观演变、盐度变化和沼泽类型分布的随之变化、水文周期和沼泽淹没的长期变化,以及当地独特沿海社区和文化的洪水风险变化。我们还考虑了水下盆地填充、空间沉积物沉积以及可能具有生态价值的浅水区的形成。这些指标将在一系列未来情景下进行综合评估,以捕捉海平面上升和沉降的长期影响。这项分析提供了支持在规划和设计阶段使用多指标方法全面评估修复工程的证据,并为修复工程施工后的适应性管理过程提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science is an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. The journal provides a unique forum, unifying the multidisciplinary approaches to the study of the oceanography of estuaries, coastal zones, and continental shelf seas. It features original research papers, review papers and short communications treating such disciplines as zoology, botany, geology, sedimentology, physical oceanography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信