Energy budgeting, carbon footprint and economics of sunflower and pigeonpea system under moisture conservation practices in rainfed semi-arid tropics

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
{"title":"Energy budgeting, carbon footprint and economics of sunflower and pigeonpea system under moisture conservation practices in rainfed semi-arid tropics","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In drylands, soil water availability in the profile during crop period, especially at critical stages is most vital. System which is productive, energy efficient with a minimum carbon (C) footprint under limited water condition is a concern. Therefore we evaluated sunflower and pigeonpea crops over two-years in terms of productivity, energy, C-footprint and profitability under different moisture conservation measures. These were raised bed, ridge and furrow, tied ridges and furrow, conservation tillage, flatbed sowing and opening furrow after every three rows at 30 days, and flatbed sowing under sole crops of sunflower and pigeonpea and intercropping at 1:1 adopted split-plot design. The results showed in-field moisture conservation by ridge and furrow produced considerably greater sunflower (59.6–66%) and pigeonpea (85.2–128.7%) yields and profitable (604.1 US$ ha<sup>−1</sup>) over traditional flatbed sowing. It also exhibited greater output energy (37.8–83.0%), energy use efficiency(4.2 kg GJ<sup>−1</sup>),and lower energy intensity (21.57 × 10<sup>−3</sup> GJ US$<sup>−1</sup>). Sunflower and pigeonpea sole crops produced higher seed yields over intercropping. But it has yield advantage in terms of greater pigeonpea equivalent yield (0.53–1.13 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>), profitability (691.8 USD ha<sup>−1</sup>), output energy (42.4 GJ ha<sup>−1</sup>) and energy ratio. Among the input energy sources, chemical fertilizers accounted 53.6 % of the total input energy. Interestingly, least C-footprints were recorded under ridge and furrow (182 kg CE kg<sup>−1</sup>grain)and intercropping (0.248 kg CE kg<sup>−1</sup> grain). Results confirmed sunflower and pigeonpea intercropping on ridge and furrow was productive, energy saving, C-footprint reduction and economical practice under rainfed condition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In drylands, soil water availability in the profile during crop period, especially at critical stages is most vital. System which is productive, energy efficient with a minimum carbon (C) footprint under limited water condition is a concern. Therefore we evaluated sunflower and pigeonpea crops over two-years in terms of productivity, energy, C-footprint and profitability under different moisture conservation measures. These were raised bed, ridge and furrow, tied ridges and furrow, conservation tillage, flatbed sowing and opening furrow after every three rows at 30 days, and flatbed sowing under sole crops of sunflower and pigeonpea and intercropping at 1:1 adopted split-plot design. The results showed in-field moisture conservation by ridge and furrow produced considerably greater sunflower (59.6–66%) and pigeonpea (85.2–128.7%) yields and profitable (604.1 US$ ha−1) over traditional flatbed sowing. It also exhibited greater output energy (37.8–83.0%), energy use efficiency(4.2 kg GJ−1),and lower energy intensity (21.57 × 10−3 GJ US$−1). Sunflower and pigeonpea sole crops produced higher seed yields over intercropping. But it has yield advantage in terms of greater pigeonpea equivalent yield (0.53–1.13 Mg ha−1), profitability (691.8 USD ha−1), output energy (42.4 GJ ha−1) and energy ratio. Among the input energy sources, chemical fertilizers accounted 53.6 % of the total input energy. Interestingly, least C-footprints were recorded under ridge and furrow (182 kg CE kg−1grain)and intercropping (0.248 kg CE kg−1 grain). Results confirmed sunflower and pigeonpea intercropping on ridge and furrow was productive, energy saving, C-footprint reduction and economical practice under rainfed condition.
半干旱热带地区雨养保墒措施下向日葵和鸽子豆系统的能源预算、碳足迹和经济学研究
在干旱地区,作物生长期的土壤水分供应至关重要,尤其是在关键阶段。在有限的水源条件下,如何建立一个高产、节能、碳足迹最小的系统是一个值得关注的问题。因此,我们评估了向日葵和鸽子豆作物在不同保墒措施下两年的产量、能耗、碳足迹和收益率。这些措施包括高床、垄沟、垄沟绑缚、保护性耕作、平板播种和每隔三行开沟 30 天,以及在单种向日葵和鸽子豆并以 1:1 的比例进行间作的情况下采用平板播种。结果表明,田间垄沟保墒法比传统的平板播种法大大提高了向日葵(59.6%-66%)和鸽子豆(85.2%-128.7%)的产量和利润(604.1 美元/公顷)。它还表现出更高的产出能量(37.8-83.0%)、能源利用效率(4.2 千克 GJ-1)和更低的能源强度(21.57 × 10-3 GJ 美元-1)。向日葵和鸽子豆单作的种子产量高于间作。但在鸽子豆等效产量(0.53-1.13 兆克/公顷-1)、收益率(691.8 美元/公顷-1)、产出能耗(42.4 千兆焦/公顷-1)和能耗比方面,间作具有产量优势。在投入能源中,化肥占总投入能源的 53.6%。有趣的是,垄沟种植(182 千克 CE 千克-1 谷物)和间作套种(0.248 千克 CE 千克-1 谷物)的碳足迹最小。结果证实,在雨水灌溉条件下,向日葵和鸽子豆间作是高产、节能、减少碳足迹和经济的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信