{"title":"A systematic review of Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. research in Ethiopia reveals gaps and opportunities for advancing management solutions","authors":"Kflay Gebrehiwot , Cara Steger","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Invasive species pose a tremendous threat to biodiversity across the globe. In Ethiopia, <em>Prosopis juliflora</em> predominantly occurs in the lowlands and posing a threat to both biodiversity and the livelihoods of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists living there. The aim of this study is to synthesize the state-of-the-art research and management practices related to <em>P. juliflora</em> in Ethiopia. A Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) flow diagram was developed for systematic review/meta-analysis, followed by the systematic review of literature (n = 85 studies) on <em>P. juliflora</em> research in Ethiopia. <em>Prosopis juliflora</em> related research exponentially increased over the past three decades. Most (48.2%) of the collaborative works were either international or local (41.2%), while national level collaborations were limited (10.6%). Regarding the disciplinary focus, the natural sciences (52.9%) dominated, whereas transdisciplinary research was extremely rare. We found that ‘<em>zonal</em>’ studies predominate (31.8%) whereas national (5.9%) and regional (2.4%) level studies were scarce. Studies that focused on species attributes comprised about 24% of studies. Basic research on public perceptions of the socio-economic and ecological impact of <em>P. juliflora</em> was the most commonly researched topic in Ethiopia (20%) However, <em>P. juliflora</em> management studies are scanty. Research gaps, including lack of transdisciplinary research and long-term experimental and observational research, were identified to help researchers, academic, decision and policymakers focus future work in these areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Invasive species pose a tremendous threat to biodiversity across the globe. In Ethiopia, Prosopis juliflora predominantly occurs in the lowlands and posing a threat to both biodiversity and the livelihoods of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists living there. The aim of this study is to synthesize the state-of-the-art research and management practices related to P. juliflora in Ethiopia. A Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) flow diagram was developed for systematic review/meta-analysis, followed by the systematic review of literature (n = 85 studies) on P. juliflora research in Ethiopia. Prosopis juliflora related research exponentially increased over the past three decades. Most (48.2%) of the collaborative works were either international or local (41.2%), while national level collaborations were limited (10.6%). Regarding the disciplinary focus, the natural sciences (52.9%) dominated, whereas transdisciplinary research was extremely rare. We found that ‘zonal’ studies predominate (31.8%) whereas national (5.9%) and regional (2.4%) level studies were scarce. Studies that focused on species attributes comprised about 24% of studies. Basic research on public perceptions of the socio-economic and ecological impact of P. juliflora was the most commonly researched topic in Ethiopia (20%) However, P. juliflora management studies are scanty. Research gaps, including lack of transdisciplinary research and long-term experimental and observational research, were identified to help researchers, academic, decision and policymakers focus future work in these areas.