Evaluating the effectiveness of insecticides on storage bag surfaces for managing Callosobruchus maculatus (fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of insecticides on storage bag surfaces for managing Callosobruchus maculatus (fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jspr.2024.102446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Incorporating insecticides into storage bags is emerging as an effective strategy for pest management. This study evaluated four insecticides (malathion 50 E.C., lambda-cyhalothrin 5 E.C., spinoteram 11.7 S.C., and azardirachtin 0.15% E.C.) for their contact toxicity against <em>Callosobruchus maculatus</em> adults. The insecticides were applied with LC<sub>50</sub> dosage to three different storage bag materials: jute, woven polypropylene (WPP), and 50% polypropylene-reinforced jute. Treatments were sprayed using a glass atomiser in three configurations: both sides treated, insect-exposed side treated, and non-exposed side treated. Twenty insects were exposed to the treated materials in closed Petri dishes, and immediate mortality was assessed at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h post-exposure. The bioassay revealed that all four insecticides achieved the desired mortality (&gt;75%) in <em>C. maculatus</em> adults; spinoteram exhibited the highest mortality in the targeted insect; however, lambda-cyhalothrin was notably effective at a lower dosage (1.10 ppm) and shorter exposure time. The efficacy of the insecticides depended on the porosity of the storage bag material. Woven polypropylene bags treated on both sides exhibited the highest mortality (76–100%) among various treatment combinations. Miniature bags (21 × 16 cm) made of selected fabrics were treated with lambda-cyhalothrin (1.1 ppm) to assess their ability to contain <em>C. maculatus</em> infestation. The insects could not penetrate the WPP bag, while jute offered less resistance. The study suggests that applying all four insecticides at LC<sub>50</sub> dosages on various storage bag materials could be an effective management practice against <em>C. maculatus</em> adults. However, the application of lambda-cyhalothrin can achieve the desired results at lower concentrations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stored Products Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stored Products Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X24002030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating insecticides into storage bags is emerging as an effective strategy for pest management. This study evaluated four insecticides (malathion 50 E.C., lambda-cyhalothrin 5 E.C., spinoteram 11.7 S.C., and azardirachtin 0.15% E.C.) for their contact toxicity against Callosobruchus maculatus adults. The insecticides were applied with LC50 dosage to three different storage bag materials: jute, woven polypropylene (WPP), and 50% polypropylene-reinforced jute. Treatments were sprayed using a glass atomiser in three configurations: both sides treated, insect-exposed side treated, and non-exposed side treated. Twenty insects were exposed to the treated materials in closed Petri dishes, and immediate mortality was assessed at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h post-exposure. The bioassay revealed that all four insecticides achieved the desired mortality (>75%) in C. maculatus adults; spinoteram exhibited the highest mortality in the targeted insect; however, lambda-cyhalothrin was notably effective at a lower dosage (1.10 ppm) and shorter exposure time. The efficacy of the insecticides depended on the porosity of the storage bag material. Woven polypropylene bags treated on both sides exhibited the highest mortality (76–100%) among various treatment combinations. Miniature bags (21 × 16 cm) made of selected fabrics were treated with lambda-cyhalothrin (1.1 ppm) to assess their ability to contain C. maculatus infestation. The insects could not penetrate the WPP bag, while jute offered less resistance. The study suggests that applying all four insecticides at LC50 dosages on various storage bag materials could be an effective management practice against C. maculatus adults. However, the application of lambda-cyhalothrin can achieve the desired results at lower concentrations.

Abstract Image

评估杀虫剂在储藏袋表面管理大褐斑蝶(鞘翅目:褐斑蝶科)的效果
在贮藏袋中加入杀虫剂正在成为一种有效的害虫管理策略。本研究评估了四种杀虫剂(马拉硫磷 50 E.C.、高效氯氟氰菊酯 5 E.C.、多菌灵 11.7 S.C.和唑虫酰胺 0.15% E.C.)对大斑蹄蜂成虫的接触毒性。在三种不同的贮藏袋材料(黄麻、聚丙烯编织袋(WPP)和 50%聚丙烯增强黄麻)上施用杀虫剂的 LC50 剂量。使用玻璃雾化器按三种配置喷洒处理剂:两面处理、昆虫暴露面处理和非暴露面处理。20 只昆虫在封闭的培养皿中接触处理过的材料,并在接触后 1、24、48 和 72 小时评估即时死亡率。生物测定结果表明,所有四种杀虫剂都能使斑潜蝇成虫达到预期的死亡率(75%);斯皮诺泰对目标昆虫的死亡率最高;然而,溴氰菊酯在较低剂量(1.10 ppm)和较短暴露时间下的效果显著。杀虫剂的功效取决于储物袋材料的孔隙率。在各种处理组合中,双面处理的聚丙烯编织袋死亡率最高(76%-100%)。用溴氰菊酯(1.1 ppm)处理选定织物制成的微型袋(21 × 16 厘米),以评估其遏制斑潜蝇侵扰的能力。昆虫无法穿透 WPP 袋,而黄麻的抗性较弱。这项研究表明,在各种储藏袋材料上施用 LC50 剂量的四种杀虫剂,可以有效地防治金龟子成虫。不过,施用溴氰菊酯可以在较低浓度下达到预期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
18.50%
发文量
112
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stored Products Research provides an international medium for the publication of both reviews and original results from laboratory and field studies on the preservation and safety of stored products, notably food stocks, covering storage-related problems from the producer through the supply chain to the consumer. Stored products are characterised by having relatively low moisture content and include raw and semi-processed foods, animal feedstuffs, and a range of other durable items, including materials such as clothing or museum artefacts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信