The formation of social groups under status concern

IF 1.4 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
{"title":"The formation of social groups under status concern","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2024.105924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I study the interaction of two forces in the formation of social groups: the preference for high quality peers and the desire for status among one's peers. I examine their equilibrium effects under different market structures and find that status concern reduces the potential for and benefit of sorting - both for a social planner and a monopolist - but the interaction between preference for quality and status can make the exclusion of some agents a second-best outcome. Even in settings with complementarities, price discrimination and screening can be necessary to facilitate sorting and increase welfare. Nevertheless, positional concerns can be beneficial for welfare if they provide sufficient incentive to engage more with one's group and thus increase positive spillovers. In those cases, welfare is higher if individuals have at least some degree of status concern, even if the welfare measure ignores such relative comparisons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053124001303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I study the interaction of two forces in the formation of social groups: the preference for high quality peers and the desire for status among one's peers. I examine their equilibrium effects under different market structures and find that status concern reduces the potential for and benefit of sorting - both for a social planner and a monopolist - but the interaction between preference for quality and status can make the exclusion of some agents a second-best outcome. Even in settings with complementarities, price discrimination and screening can be necessary to facilitate sorting and increase welfare. Nevertheless, positional concerns can be beneficial for welfare if they provide sufficient incentive to engage more with one's group and thus increase positive spillovers. In those cases, welfare is higher if individuals have at least some degree of status concern, even if the welfare measure ignores such relative comparisons.
地位关切下社会群体的形成
我研究了社会群体形成过程中两种力量的相互作用:对高质量同伴的偏好和对同伴中地位的渴望。我研究了它们在不同市场结构下的均衡效应,发现对社会规划者和垄断者而言,对地位的关注会降低分拣的潜力和收益,但对质量和地位的偏好之间的相互作用会使排斥某些代理人成为次优结果。即使在具有互补性的情况下,价格歧视和筛选对于促进分类和增加福利也是必要的。然而,如果地位问题能够提供足够的激励,促使人们更多地参与自己的群体,从而增加积极的溢出效应,那么地位问题就会对福利有利。在这种情况下,如果个人至少有一定程度的地位关切,即使福利衡量忽略了这种相对比较,福利也会更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Theory publishes original research on economic theory and emphasizes the theoretical analysis of economic models, including the study of related mathematical techniques. JET is the leading journal in economic theory. It is also one of nine core journals in all of economics. Among these journals, the Journal of Economic Theory ranks fourth in impact-adjusted citations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信