Plant Silicon Defences Suppress Herbivore Performance, but Mode of Feeding Is Key

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1111/ele.14519
Scott N. Johnson, Jamie M. Waterman, Susan E. Hartley, Julia Cooke, James M. W. Ryalls, Malgorzata Lagisz, Shinichi Nakagawa
{"title":"Plant Silicon Defences Suppress Herbivore Performance, but Mode of Feeding Is Key","authors":"Scott N. Johnson,&nbsp;Jamie M. Waterman,&nbsp;Susan E. Hartley,&nbsp;Julia Cooke,&nbsp;James M. W. Ryalls,&nbsp;Malgorzata Lagisz,&nbsp;Shinichi Nakagawa","doi":"10.1111/ele.14519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The performance of herbivorous animals depends on the nutritional and defensive traits of the plants they consume. The uptake and deposition of biogenic silicon in plant tissues is arguably the most basic and ubiquitous anti-herbivore defence used by plants, especially grasses. We conducted meta-analyses of 150 studies reporting how vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores performed when feeding on silicon-rich plants relative to those feeding on low-silicon plants. Silicon levels were 52% higher and 32% more variable in silicon-rich plants compared to plants with low silicon, which resulted in an overall 33% decline in herbivore performance. Fluid-feeding herbivore performance was less adversely impacted (−14%) than tissue-chewing herbivores, including mammals (−45%), chewing arthropods (−33%) and plant-boring arthropods (−39%). Fluid-feeding arthropods with a wide diet breadth or those feeding on perennial plant species were mostly unaffected by silicon defences. Unlike many other plant defences, where diet specialisation often helps herbivores overcome their effects, silicon negatively impacts chewing herbivores regardless of diet breadth. We conclude that silicon defences primarily target chewing herbivores and impact vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores to a similar degree.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14519","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14519","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of herbivorous animals depends on the nutritional and defensive traits of the plants they consume. The uptake and deposition of biogenic silicon in plant tissues is arguably the most basic and ubiquitous anti-herbivore defence used by plants, especially grasses. We conducted meta-analyses of 150 studies reporting how vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores performed when feeding on silicon-rich plants relative to those feeding on low-silicon plants. Silicon levels were 52% higher and 32% more variable in silicon-rich plants compared to plants with low silicon, which resulted in an overall 33% decline in herbivore performance. Fluid-feeding herbivore performance was less adversely impacted (−14%) than tissue-chewing herbivores, including mammals (−45%), chewing arthropods (−33%) and plant-boring arthropods (−39%). Fluid-feeding arthropods with a wide diet breadth or those feeding on perennial plant species were mostly unaffected by silicon defences. Unlike many other plant defences, where diet specialisation often helps herbivores overcome their effects, silicon negatively impacts chewing herbivores regardless of diet breadth. We conclude that silicon defences primarily target chewing herbivores and impact vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores to a similar degree.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

植物硅防御抑制食草动物的表现,但取食方式是关键
食草动物的表现取决于它们所食用植物的营养和防御特性。植物组织中生物硅的吸收和沉积可以说是植物(尤其是禾本科植物)最基本、最普遍的反食草动物防御手段。我们对 150 项研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究报告了脊椎动物和无脊椎动物食草动物在摄食富含硅的植物时与摄食低硅植物时的表现。与低硅植物相比,富硅植物中的硅含量高出52%,变化幅度大32%,这导致食草动物的整体表现下降33%。与咀嚼组织的食草动物(包括哺乳动物(-45%)、咀嚼节肢动物(-33%)和植物蛀食节肢动物(-39%))相比,流食性食草动物的表现受到的负面影响较小(-14%)。食性广泛的流食性节肢动物或以多年生植物为食的节肢动物大多不受硅防护的影响。与许多其他植物防御措施不同的是,硅对咀嚼类草食动物的负面影响与食性广度无关。我们的结论是,硅防御主要针对咀嚼食草动物,对脊椎动物和无脊椎动物食草动物的影响程度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信