Cross-laminated timber for seismic retrofitting of RC buildings: Substructured pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale prototype

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Stylianos Kallioras, Dionysios Bournas, Francesco Smiroldo, Ivan Giongo, Maurizio Piazza, Francisco Javier Molina
{"title":"Cross-laminated timber for seismic retrofitting of RC buildings: Substructured pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale prototype","authors":"Stylianos Kallioras,&nbsp;Dionysios Bournas,&nbsp;Francesco Smiroldo,&nbsp;Ivan Giongo,&nbsp;Maurizio Piazza,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Molina","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents an experimental study on an innovative timber-based retrofit solution for reinforced concrete (RC) framed buildings, with or without masonry infills. The intervention aims to enhance seismic resistance through a light, cost-effective, sustainable, and reversible approach integrating energy efficiency upgrades. The method employs cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels as infills or external retrofitting elements, mechanically connected to the RC frame through steel fasteners. The system is combined with thermal insulation for improved energy efficiency. The seismic performance of the proposed retrofit technique was assessed experimentally on a full-scale building model at the European Laboratory for Structural Assessment (ELSA). The experiments included tests on two five-story building configurations: a masonry-infilled RC building as a reference and the same structure strengthened with CLT panels. Each building was subjected to unidirectional earthquake simulations of increasing intensity using the pseudodynamic (PsD) testing method with substructuring. The physical substructure of the hybrid model consisted of the first story of a two-story mockup built and retrofitted in the laboratory, while stories two to five were simulated numerically. The paper discusses major observations from the tests, comparing the damage evolution and hysteretic responses of the two configurations. The experiments yielded promising results, showing that the suggested retrofit solution significantly increased displacement and energy dissipation capacity. The retrofitted building survived earthquake intensities up to 50% higher than the non-retrofitted counterpart, exhibiting only slight structural damage. These pioneering experiments provide compelling data on the high effectiveness of the proposed CLT-based retrofit system in enhancing the seismic performance of full-scale RC buildings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"53 14","pages":"4354-4378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4222","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study on an innovative timber-based retrofit solution for reinforced concrete (RC) framed buildings, with or without masonry infills. The intervention aims to enhance seismic resistance through a light, cost-effective, sustainable, and reversible approach integrating energy efficiency upgrades. The method employs cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels as infills or external retrofitting elements, mechanically connected to the RC frame through steel fasteners. The system is combined with thermal insulation for improved energy efficiency. The seismic performance of the proposed retrofit technique was assessed experimentally on a full-scale building model at the European Laboratory for Structural Assessment (ELSA). The experiments included tests on two five-story building configurations: a masonry-infilled RC building as a reference and the same structure strengthened with CLT panels. Each building was subjected to unidirectional earthquake simulations of increasing intensity using the pseudodynamic (PsD) testing method with substructuring. The physical substructure of the hybrid model consisted of the first story of a two-story mockup built and retrofitted in the laboratory, while stories two to five were simulated numerically. The paper discusses major observations from the tests, comparing the damage evolution and hysteretic responses of the two configurations. The experiments yielded promising results, showing that the suggested retrofit solution significantly increased displacement and energy dissipation capacity. The retrofitted building survived earthquake intensities up to 50% higher than the non-retrofitted counterpart, exhibiting only slight structural damage. These pioneering experiments provide compelling data on the high effectiveness of the proposed CLT-based retrofit system in enhancing the seismic performance of full-scale RC buildings.

Abstract Image

用于 RC 建筑抗震改造的交叉层压木材:全尺寸原型上的次结构假动力试验
本文介绍了一项针对钢筋混凝土(RC)框架建筑(无论是否有砌体填充)的创新木材改造解决方案的实验研究。该干预措施旨在通过一种轻质、经济、可持续和可逆的方法来提高抗震性,并将能效升级整合在一起。该方法采用交叉层压木材(CLT)板作为填充物或外部改造元件,通过钢紧固件与 RC 框架机械连接。该系统与隔热材料相结合,提高了能源效率。在欧洲结构评估实验室(ELSA)的一个全尺寸建筑模型上,对拟议改造技术的抗震性能进行了实验评估。实验包括对两栋五层建筑结构的测试:一栋砌体填充的 RC 建筑作为参考,另一栋是用 CLT 板加固的相同结构。每栋建筑都接受了烈度递增的单向地震模拟,采用的是带次结构的假动力(PsD)测试方法。混合模型的物理子结构包括在实验室建造和改造的两层模拟建筑的第一层,而第二至第五层则通过数值模拟。论文讨论了试验的主要观察结果,比较了两种结构的损伤演变和滞后响应。实验结果表明,建议的改造方案显著提高了位移和消能能力。改造后的建筑在地震烈度比未改造的建筑高出 50%的情况下仍能幸存,仅表现出轻微的结构损坏。这些开创性的实验提供了令人信服的数据,证明所建议的基于 CLT 的改造系统在提高全尺寸 RC 建筑抗震性能方面具有很高的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信