{"title":"Seismic fragility and resilience assessment of large-span cable-stayed bridges under multi-support ground motions with non-Gaussian characteristics","authors":"Yucong Lan, Jun Xu, Jian Zhong, Yang Li","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seismic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of large-span cable-stayed bridge structures are critical for evaluating their seismic performance. However, there is a scarcity of research on the effects of multi-support ground motions and their non-Gaussian characteristics on seismic fragility and resilience. This paper aims to addresses this issue. Initially, random ground motions with spatial variability and non-Gaussian characteristics are simulated using the Spectral Representation Method (SRM) and the Unified Hermite Polynomial Model (UHPM). Subsequently, the Fractional Exponential Moments-based Maximum Entropy Method (FEM-MEM) and the Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Model (AGMM) are employed for seismic reliability-based fragility analysis, overcoming the shortcomings of conventional lognormal assumption. Component- and system-level fragility analyses are conducted sequentially, followed by seismic resilience assessment of bridge structures based on the results of system-level fragility analysis. A numerical example is presented to validate the proposed method. Computational results indicate that: (1) The proposed method offers higher accuracy and broader applicability for seismic fragility analysis of large-span cable-stayed bridge structures compared to traditional assumptions. (2) The non-Gaussian characteristics of ground motions may significantly impact the seismic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of large-span bridge structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"53 14","pages":"4310-4333"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seismic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of large-span cable-stayed bridge structures are critical for evaluating their seismic performance. However, there is a scarcity of research on the effects of multi-support ground motions and their non-Gaussian characteristics on seismic fragility and resilience. This paper aims to addresses this issue. Initially, random ground motions with spatial variability and non-Gaussian characteristics are simulated using the Spectral Representation Method (SRM) and the Unified Hermite Polynomial Model (UHPM). Subsequently, the Fractional Exponential Moments-based Maximum Entropy Method (FEM-MEM) and the Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Model (AGMM) are employed for seismic reliability-based fragility analysis, overcoming the shortcomings of conventional lognormal assumption. Component- and system-level fragility analyses are conducted sequentially, followed by seismic resilience assessment of bridge structures based on the results of system-level fragility analysis. A numerical example is presented to validate the proposed method. Computational results indicate that: (1) The proposed method offers higher accuracy and broader applicability for seismic fragility analysis of large-span cable-stayed bridge structures compared to traditional assumptions. (2) The non-Gaussian characteristics of ground motions may significantly impact the seismic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of large-span bridge structures.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following:
ground motions for analysis and design
geotechnical earthquake engineering
probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis
experimental behaviour of structures
seismic protective systems
system identification
risk assessment
seismic code requirements
methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.