Field Assessment of Biochar Interactions With Chemical and Biological N Fertilization in Pointed White Cabbage

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Raúl Castejón-del Pino, María L. Cayuela, María Sánchez-García, Jose A. Siles, Miguel A. Sánchez-Monedero
{"title":"Field Assessment of Biochar Interactions With Chemical and Biological N Fertilization in Pointed White Cabbage","authors":"Raúl Castejón-del Pino,&nbsp;María L. Cayuela,&nbsp;María Sánchez-García,&nbsp;Jose A. Siles,&nbsp;Miguel A. Sánchez-Monedero","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interaction of biochar with mineral fertilization has attracted attention as a strategy to reduce N losses and enhance nitrogen use efficiency. In this study, we investigated the coapplication of biochar with two optimized fertilization strategies based on split urea and a microbial inoculant (<i>Azospirillum brasilense</i>) in a commercial pointed white cabbage crop. Additionally, we evaluated a third optimized N fertilization alternative, a biochar-based fertilizer (BBF) enriched in plant-available N, which was developed from the same biochar. We assessed environmental impacts such as greenhouse gasses (GHG) and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions, yield-scaled N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, and global warming potential (GWP). Additionally, we evaluated agronomical outcomes such as crop yield, plant N, and chlorophyll concentration. Moreover, we examined the N-fixing gene's total and relative abundance (<i>nifH</i> and <i>nifH</i>/16S). Biochar and BBF exhibited similar crop yield, GHG, and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions compared to split applications of the synthetic fertilizer. The main difference was associated with the higher soil C sequestration in biochar and BBF treatments that reduced the associated GWP of these fertilization strategies. Finally, biochar favored the activity of the N-fixing bacteria spread, compared to the sole application of bacteria and BBF demonstrated a promoting effect in the soil's total abundance of natural N-fixing bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interaction of biochar with mineral fertilization has attracted attention as a strategy to reduce N losses and enhance nitrogen use efficiency. In this study, we investigated the coapplication of biochar with two optimized fertilization strategies based on split urea and a microbial inoculant (Azospirillum brasilense) in a commercial pointed white cabbage crop. Additionally, we evaluated a third optimized N fertilization alternative, a biochar-based fertilizer (BBF) enriched in plant-available N, which was developed from the same biochar. We assessed environmental impacts such as greenhouse gasses (GHG) and NH3 emissions, yield-scaled N2O emissions, and global warming potential (GWP). Additionally, we evaluated agronomical outcomes such as crop yield, plant N, and chlorophyll concentration. Moreover, we examined the N-fixing gene's total and relative abundance (nifH and nifH/16S). Biochar and BBF exhibited similar crop yield, GHG, and NH3 emissions compared to split applications of the synthetic fertilizer. The main difference was associated with the higher soil C sequestration in biochar and BBF treatments that reduced the associated GWP of these fertilization strategies. Finally, biochar favored the activity of the N-fixing bacteria spread, compared to the sole application of bacteria and BBF demonstrated a promoting effect in the soil's total abundance of natural N-fixing bacteria.

Abstract Image

生物炭与化学氮肥和生物氮肥在尖头白花菜中的相互作用的实地评估
生物炭与矿物肥料的相互作用作为一种减少氮损失和提高氮利用效率的策略,引起了人们的关注。在这项研究中,我们调查了生物炭与基于分离尿素和微生物接种剂(巴西天青球菌)的两种优化施肥策略在商业尖头白甘蓝作物中的共同应用。此外,我们还评估了第三种优化氮肥替代方案,即一种富含植物可利用氮的生物炭基肥料(BBF),该肥料由相同的生物炭开发而成。我们评估了对环境的影响,如温室气体 (GHG) 和 NH3 排放量、按产量缩放的 N2O 排放量以及全球变暖潜能值 (GWP)。此外,我们还评估了农艺结果,如作物产量、植物氮和叶绿素浓度。此外,我们还考察了固氮基因的总丰度和相对丰度(nifH 和 nifH/16S)。与分次施用合成肥料相比,生物炭和 BBF 表现出相似的作物产量、温室气体和 NH3 排放量。主要区别在于生物炭和 BBF 处理的土壤固碳量更高,从而降低了这些施肥策略的相关全球升温潜能值。最后,与单独施用细菌相比,生物炭有利于固氮细菌的扩散活动,而 BBF 则对土壤中天然固氮细菌的总丰度有促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信