A critical re-analysis of biochar properties prediction from production parameters and elemental analysis

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Johanne Lebrun Thauront, Gerhard Soja, Hans-Peter Schmidt, Samuel Abiven
{"title":"A critical re-analysis of biochar properties prediction from production parameters and elemental analysis","authors":"Johanne Lebrun Thauront,&nbsp;Gerhard Soja,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Schmidt,&nbsp;Samuel Abiven","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biochar is the product of intentional pyrolysis of organic feedstocks. It is made under controlled conditions in order to achieve desired physico-chemical characteristics. These characteristics ultimately affect biochar properties as a soil amendment. When biochar is used for carbon storage, an important property is its persistence in soil, often described by the proportion of biochar carbon remaining in soil after a 100 years (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>). We analyzed published data on 1230 biochars to re-evaluate the effect of pyrolysis parameters on biochar characteristics and the possibility to predict <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> from the maximum temperature reached during pyrolysis (HTT). We showed that biochar ash and nitrogen (N) contents were mostly affected by feedstock type. The oxygen to carbon (O:C) and hydrogen to carbon (H:C) ratios were mostly affected by the extent of pyrolysis (a combination of HTT and pyrolysis duration), except for non (ligno)cellulosic feedstocks (plastic waste, sewage sludge). The volatile matter (VM) content was affected by both feedstock type and the extent of pyrolysis. We demonstrated that HTT is the main driver of H:C -- an indicator of persistence -- but that it is not measured accurately enough to precisely predict H:C, let alone persistence. We examined the equations to estimate <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> available in the literature and showed that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> calculated from HTT presented little agreement with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> calculated from H:C. The sign and magnitude of the bias depended on the equation used to calculate <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and the dispersion was usually large. This could lead to improper compensation of carbon emissions and wrong reporting of carbon sinks in national carbon accounting schemes. We recommend not to use HTT as a predictor for persistence and stress the importance to rapidly develop more accurate proxies of biochar C persistence in soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13170","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biochar is the product of intentional pyrolysis of organic feedstocks. It is made under controlled conditions in order to achieve desired physico-chemical characteristics. These characteristics ultimately affect biochar properties as a soil amendment. When biochar is used for carbon storage, an important property is its persistence in soil, often described by the proportion of biochar carbon remaining in soil after a 100 years ( F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} $$ ). We analyzed published data on 1230 biochars to re-evaluate the effect of pyrolysis parameters on biochar characteristics and the possibility to predict F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} $$ from the maximum temperature reached during pyrolysis (HTT). We showed that biochar ash and nitrogen (N) contents were mostly affected by feedstock type. The oxygen to carbon (O:C) and hydrogen to carbon (H:C) ratios were mostly affected by the extent of pyrolysis (a combination of HTT and pyrolysis duration), except for non (ligno)cellulosic feedstocks (plastic waste, sewage sludge). The volatile matter (VM) content was affected by both feedstock type and the extent of pyrolysis. We demonstrated that HTT is the main driver of H:C -- an indicator of persistence -- but that it is not measured accurately enough to precisely predict H:C, let alone persistence. We examined the equations to estimate F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} $$ available in the literature and showed that F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} $$ calculated from HTT presented little agreement with F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} $$ calculated from H:C. The sign and magnitude of the bias depended on the equation used to calculate F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} $$ and the dispersion was usually large. This could lead to improper compensation of carbon emissions and wrong reporting of carbon sinks in national carbon accounting schemes. We recommend not to use HTT as a predictor for persistence and stress the importance to rapidly develop more accurate proxies of biochar C persistence in soil.

Abstract Image

对根据生产参数和元素分析预测的生物炭特性进行批判性再分析
生物炭是有意热解有机原料的产物。它是在受控条件下制成的,目的是获得理想的物理化学特性。这些特性最终会影响生物炭作为土壤改良剂的特性。当生物炭用于碳储存时,一个重要的特性是其在土壤中的持久性,通常用 100 年后生物炭碳在土壤中的残留比例(F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_\{mathrm{perm}} 来描述。$$ ).我们分析了已公布的 1230 种生物炭的数据,以重新评估热解参数对生物炭特性的影响,以及根据热解过程中达到的最高温度预测 F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} $ 的可能性。从热解过程中达到的最高温度 (HTT) 预测 F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} 的可能性。我们发现,生物炭灰分和氮(N)含量主要受原料类型的影响。氧碳比(O:C)和氢碳比(H:C)主要受热解程度(HTT 和热解持续时间的组合)的影响,但非(木质)纤维素原料(塑料废料、污水污泥)除外。挥发性物质(VM)含量受原料类型和热解程度的影响。我们证明了 HTT 是 H:C 的主要驱动因素(持久性指标),但 HTT 的测量不够精确,无法准确预测 H:C,更不用说持久性了。我们研究了文献中用于估算F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} 的方程,结果表明我们研究了文献中可用的 F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} 的估算方程,结果表明从 HTT 计算出的 F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{perm}} 几乎没有显示出持久性。根据 HTT 计算得出的 F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{mathrm{perm}} 与根据 H:C 计算得出的 F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{mathrm{perm}} 几乎不一致。$$ 由 H:C 计算得出。偏差的符号和大小取决于用于计算 F perm $$ {\mathrm{F}}_{mathrm{perm}} 的方程。$$ 的偏差通常很大。这可能导致国家碳核算方案中碳排放补偿不当和碳汇报告错误。我们建议不要使用 HTT 作为持久性的预测指标,并强调快速开发更准确的生物炭在土壤中的碳持久性代用指标的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信