Johanne Lebrun Thauront, Gerhard Soja, Hans-Peter Schmidt, Samuel Abiven
{"title":"A critical re-analysis of biochar properties prediction from production parameters and elemental analysis","authors":"Johanne Lebrun Thauront, Gerhard Soja, Hans-Peter Schmidt, Samuel Abiven","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biochar is the product of intentional pyrolysis of organic feedstocks. It is made under controlled conditions in order to achieve desired physico-chemical characteristics. These characteristics ultimately affect biochar properties as a soil amendment. When biochar is used for carbon storage, an important property is its persistence in soil, often described by the proportion of biochar carbon remaining in soil after a 100 years (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>). We analyzed published data on 1230 biochars to re-evaluate the effect of pyrolysis parameters on biochar characteristics and the possibility to predict <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> from the maximum temperature reached during pyrolysis (HTT). We showed that biochar ash and nitrogen (N) contents were mostly affected by feedstock type. The oxygen to carbon (O:C) and hydrogen to carbon (H:C) ratios were mostly affected by the extent of pyrolysis (a combination of HTT and pyrolysis duration), except for non (ligno)cellulosic feedstocks (plastic waste, sewage sludge). The volatile matter (VM) content was affected by both feedstock type and the extent of pyrolysis. We demonstrated that HTT is the main driver of H:C -- an indicator of persistence -- but that it is not measured accurately enough to precisely predict H:C, let alone persistence. We examined the equations to estimate <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> available in the literature and showed that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> calculated from HTT presented little agreement with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> calculated from H:C. The sign and magnitude of the bias depended on the equation used to calculate <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mtext>perm</mtext>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{F}}_{\\mathrm{perm}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and the dispersion was usually large. This could lead to improper compensation of carbon emissions and wrong reporting of carbon sinks in national carbon accounting schemes. We recommend not to use HTT as a predictor for persistence and stress the importance to rapidly develop more accurate proxies of biochar C persistence in soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13170","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biochar is the product of intentional pyrolysis of organic feedstocks. It is made under controlled conditions in order to achieve desired physico-chemical characteristics. These characteristics ultimately affect biochar properties as a soil amendment. When biochar is used for carbon storage, an important property is its persistence in soil, often described by the proportion of biochar carbon remaining in soil after a 100 years (). We analyzed published data on 1230 biochars to re-evaluate the effect of pyrolysis parameters on biochar characteristics and the possibility to predict from the maximum temperature reached during pyrolysis (HTT). We showed that biochar ash and nitrogen (N) contents were mostly affected by feedstock type. The oxygen to carbon (O:C) and hydrogen to carbon (H:C) ratios were mostly affected by the extent of pyrolysis (a combination of HTT and pyrolysis duration), except for non (ligno)cellulosic feedstocks (plastic waste, sewage sludge). The volatile matter (VM) content was affected by both feedstock type and the extent of pyrolysis. We demonstrated that HTT is the main driver of H:C -- an indicator of persistence -- but that it is not measured accurately enough to precisely predict H:C, let alone persistence. We examined the equations to estimate available in the literature and showed that calculated from HTT presented little agreement with calculated from H:C. The sign and magnitude of the bias depended on the equation used to calculate and the dispersion was usually large. This could lead to improper compensation of carbon emissions and wrong reporting of carbon sinks in national carbon accounting schemes. We recommend not to use HTT as a predictor for persistence and stress the importance to rapidly develop more accurate proxies of biochar C persistence in soil.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.