Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Friedemann Baur, Sam Hiebert
{"title":"Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization","authors":"Friedemann Baur,&nbsp;Sam Hiebert","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO<sub>2</sub> plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO<sub>2</sub> plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin-scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO<sub>2</sub> density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"14 5","pages":"760-775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin-scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

用于二氧化碳捕获和封存场地筛选和特征描述的侵蚀渗流和盆地建模
在碳捕获与封存(CCS)场地评估的早期筛选阶段,由于时间和数据有限,因此几乎从未使用时间和数据密集型储层模拟来进行二氧化碳羽流评估。然而,仍有必要进行早期羽流评估,以便对注入地点进行风险排序。因此,在二氧化碳捕获与封存(CCS)筛选阶段采用了另一种流体迁移方法--入侵渗流法,以预测地下二氧化碳羽流的范围和位置。作为盆地建模的一部分,入侵渗流法是一种快速方法,需要的数据有限,非常适合早期筛选阶段。入侵渗流结果与筛选阶段典型的未校准储层模型进行了比较,发现羽流位置的形状和大小非常合理,尤其是与地震观测到的羽流轮廓相比。可以得出的结论是,作为盆地建模的一部分,入侵渗流是一种适用的方法,可以在早期摄入筛选阶段快速评估多个机会,对机会进行风险排序,并建立 CCS 注入地点组合。除了羽流评估之外,盆地模型还可以在获得详细的储层和地层模型之前,提供有用的盆地尺度或注入地点特定的压力和温度预测,以及用于静态体积计算的二氧化碳密度估算。© 2024 化学工业协会和 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信