Waves and Instabilities in Saturn's Magnetosheath: 2. Dispersion Relation Analysis

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
I. Cheng, N. Achilleos, X. Blanco-Cano, C. Bertucci, P. Guio
{"title":"Waves and Instabilities in Saturn's Magnetosheath: 2. Dispersion Relation Analysis","authors":"I. Cheng,&nbsp;N. Achilleos,&nbsp;X. Blanco-Cano,&nbsp;C. Bertucci,&nbsp;P. Guio","doi":"10.1029/2024JA032585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The WHAMP (Rönnmark, 1982, https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:14744092) and LEOPARD (Astfalk &amp; Jenko, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja023522) dispersion relation solvers were used to evaluate the growth rate and scale size for mirror mode (MM) and ion cyclotron (IC) instabilities under plasma conditions resembling Saturn's magnetosheath in order to compare observations to predictions from linear kinetic theory. Instabilities and waves are prevalent in planetary magnetosheaths. Understanding the origin and conditions under which different instabilities grow and dominate can help shed light on the role each instability plays in influencing the plasma dynamics of the region. For anisotropic plasmas modeled with bi-Maxwellian particle distribution, the dispersion, growth rate, and scale size of MM and IC were studied as functions of proton temperature anisotropy, proton plasma beta, and oxygen ion abundance. The dispersion solvers showed that the IC mode dominated over MM under typical conditions in Saturn's magnetosheath, but that MM could dominate for high enough <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${O}^{+}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> abundance <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfenced>\n <mrow>\n <mo>&gt;</mo>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mi>%</mi>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <msub>\n <mi>n</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\left( &gt; 40\\%\\ {\\mathrm{n}}_{\\mathrm{e}}\\right)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. These water ion-rich plasma conditions are occasionally found in Saturn's magnetosheath (Sergis et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50164). The maximum linear growth rates <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfenced>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>γ</mi>\n <mi>m</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>Ω</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\left({\\gamma }_{m}/{{\\Omega }}_{p}\\right)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for MM ranged from 0.02 to 0.2, larger than expected from observations. The scale size at maximum growth rate ranged from 4 to 12 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>ρ</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\rho }_{\\mathrm{p}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, smaller than expected from observations. These inconsistencies could potentially be attributed to diffusion and non-linear growth processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA032585","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA032585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The WHAMP (Rönnmark, 1982, https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:14744092) and LEOPARD (Astfalk & Jenko, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja023522) dispersion relation solvers were used to evaluate the growth rate and scale size for mirror mode (MM) and ion cyclotron (IC) instabilities under plasma conditions resembling Saturn's magnetosheath in order to compare observations to predictions from linear kinetic theory. Instabilities and waves are prevalent in planetary magnetosheaths. Understanding the origin and conditions under which different instabilities grow and dominate can help shed light on the role each instability plays in influencing the plasma dynamics of the region. For anisotropic plasmas modeled with bi-Maxwellian particle distribution, the dispersion, growth rate, and scale size of MM and IC were studied as functions of proton temperature anisotropy, proton plasma beta, and oxygen ion abundance. The dispersion solvers showed that the IC mode dominated over MM under typical conditions in Saturn's magnetosheath, but that MM could dominate for high enough O + ${O}^{+}$ abundance > 40 % n e $\left( > 40\%\ {\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{e}}\right)$ . These water ion-rich plasma conditions are occasionally found in Saturn's magnetosheath (Sergis et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50164). The maximum linear growth rates γ m / Ω p $\left({\gamma }_{m}/{{\Omega }}_{p}\right)$ for MM ranged from 0.02 to 0.2, larger than expected from observations. The scale size at maximum growth rate ranged from 4 to 12 ρ p ${\rho }_{\mathrm{p}}$ , smaller than expected from observations. These inconsistencies could potentially be attributed to diffusion and non-linear growth processes.

土星磁鞘中的波和不稳定性: 2. 分散关系分析
WHAMP(Rönnmark,1982年,https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:14744092)和LEOPARD(Astfalk & Jenko,2017年,https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja023522)分散关系求解器被用来评估在类似土星磁鞘的等离子体条件下镜像模式(MM)和离子回旋(IC)不稳定性的增长率和规模大小,以便将观测结果与线性动力学理论的预测结果进行比较。不稳定性和波在行星磁鞘中非常普遍。了解不同不稳定性增长和占主导地位的起源和条件,有助于阐明每种不稳定性在影响该区域等离子体动力学方面所起的作用。对于以双麦克斯韦粒子分布建模的各向异性等离子体,研究了MM和IC的弥散、增长率和尺度大小作为质子温度各向异性、质子等离子体β和氧离子丰度的函数。弥散求解器显示,在土星磁鞘的典型条件下,IC模式比MM模式占主导地位,但当O + ${O}^{+}$ 的丰度足够高时,MM可能会占主导地位(> 40 % n e $\left( > 40\%\ {mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{e}}\right)$ 。这些富含水离子的等离子体条件偶尔会在土星的磁鞘中发现(Sergis 等人,2013 年,https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50164)。MM 的最大线性增长率 γ m / Ω p $\left({\gamma }_{m}/{\Omega }}_{p}\right)$ 在 0.02 到 0.2 之间,大于观测结果的预期。最大增长率时的尺度大小在 4 到 12 ρ p ${rho }_{\mathrm{p}}$ 之间,小于观测结果的预期。这些不一致可能是由于扩散和非线性生长过程造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信