Towards accurate modelling of rock surface exposure dating using luminescence to estimate post-exposure erosion rate

IF 1.7 2区 地球科学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Arbaz N. Pathan , Rabiul H. Biswas , Benjamin Lehmann , Georgina E. King , Frédéric Herman
{"title":"Towards accurate modelling of rock surface exposure dating using luminescence to estimate post-exposure erosion rate","authors":"Arbaz N. Pathan ,&nbsp;Rabiul H. Biswas ,&nbsp;Benjamin Lehmann ,&nbsp;Georgina E. King ,&nbsp;Frédéric Herman","doi":"10.1016/j.quageo.2024.101634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Depth-dependent luminescence in the top few millimetres of rock surface emerges as a potential tool to estimate rock surface exposure age and post-exposure erosion rate. It relies on the principle that the luminescence depth profile (LDP) propagates deeper with the time of sunlight exposure and moves to shallower depth with the erosion rate. The propagation of LDP is generally assumed to follow the first-order kinetic (FOK) model, except for a few recent studies. The FOK model predicts an exponential decay of infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL) signal with light exposure time, which rarely corroborates experimental observation; IRSL signal decay is much slower than exponential decay. The faster decay of IRSL, predicted by the FOK model, results in faster propagation of LDP and thus always underestimates the exposure age and translates into a higher erosion rate. Interestingly, the slower-than-exponential decay of the IRSL signal can be better explained by general order kinetics (GOK). Thus, recent studies on rock surface luminescence dating have employed the GOK model. However, the GOK model is yet to be explored to predict post-exposure erosion rates. Here, we apply the GOK model and theoretically demonstrate the impact of the order of kinetics on the calibration and propagation of LDP in the presence of erosion and how the LDP's transient to steady state transition depends on the order of kinetics. We have performed a series of synthetic tests to assess the impact of selecting an incorrect model on the prediction of erosion rate. Finally, using the revised rate equation, the erosion rates are recalculated for natural samples (data available in the literature: Lehmann et al. (2019b)) and the impact of GOK on the predicted erosion rate is discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54516,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Geochronology","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 101634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101424001389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depth-dependent luminescence in the top few millimetres of rock surface emerges as a potential tool to estimate rock surface exposure age and post-exposure erosion rate. It relies on the principle that the luminescence depth profile (LDP) propagates deeper with the time of sunlight exposure and moves to shallower depth with the erosion rate. The propagation of LDP is generally assumed to follow the first-order kinetic (FOK) model, except for a few recent studies. The FOK model predicts an exponential decay of infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL) signal with light exposure time, which rarely corroborates experimental observation; IRSL signal decay is much slower than exponential decay. The faster decay of IRSL, predicted by the FOK model, results in faster propagation of LDP and thus always underestimates the exposure age and translates into a higher erosion rate. Interestingly, the slower-than-exponential decay of the IRSL signal can be better explained by general order kinetics (GOK). Thus, recent studies on rock surface luminescence dating have employed the GOK model. However, the GOK model is yet to be explored to predict post-exposure erosion rates. Here, we apply the GOK model and theoretically demonstrate the impact of the order of kinetics on the calibration and propagation of LDP in the presence of erosion and how the LDP's transient to steady state transition depends on the order of kinetics. We have performed a series of synthetic tests to assess the impact of selecting an incorrect model on the prediction of erosion rate. Finally, using the revised rate equation, the erosion rates are recalculated for natural samples (data available in the literature: Lehmann et al. (2019b)) and the impact of GOK on the predicted erosion rate is discussed.
利用发光法估算暴露后的侵蚀速率,建立岩石表面暴露年代测定的精确模型
岩石表面顶部几毫米处的发光深度是估算岩石表面暴露年龄和暴露后侵蚀速率的潜在工具。它所依赖的原理是,发光深度剖面(LDP)随着阳光照射时间的延长而加深,并随着侵蚀速率的增加而变浅。除了最近的一些研究之外,一般都假定 LDP 的传播遵循一阶动力学(FOK)模型。FOK 模型预测红外激发发光(IRSL)信号随光照时间呈指数衰减,但这很少与实验观察结果相吻合;IRSL 信号衰减比指数衰减慢得多。根据 FOK 模型的预测,IRSL 的衰减速度越快,LDP 的传播速度就越快,因此总是会低估曝光时间,并转化为更高的侵蚀率。有趣的是,一般阶次动力学(GOK)可以更好地解释 IRSL 信号的慢于指数的衰减。因此,最近的岩石表面发光测年研究都采用了 GOK 模型。然而,GOK 模型在预测暴露后的侵蚀速率方面还有待探索。在此,我们应用 GOK 模型,从理论上证明了动力学阶次对存在侵蚀时 LDP 的校准和传播的影响,以及 LDP 从瞬态到稳态的转变如何取决于动力学阶次。我们进行了一系列合成测试,以评估选择错误模型对侵蚀速率预测的影响。最后,利用修订后的速率方程,重新计算了自然样本的侵蚀速率(数据可在文献中找到:Lehmann 等人(2019b))的侵蚀率,并讨论了 GOK 对预测侵蚀率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quaternary Geochronology
Quaternary Geochronology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Quaternary Geochronology is an international journal devoted to the publication of the highest-quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of dating methods applicable to the Quaternary Period - the last 2.6 million years of Earth history. Reliable ages are fundamental to place changes in climates, landscapes, flora and fauna - including the evolution and ecological impact of humans - in their correct temporal sequence, and to understand the tempo and mode of geological and biological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信