Farm-level acceptability of contract attributes in agri-environment-climate measures for biodiversity conservation

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Harold Opdenbosch , Mark V. Brady , Ivan Bimbilovski , Rebecca Swärd , Gordana Manevska-Tasevska
{"title":"Farm-level acceptability of contract attributes in agri-environment-climate measures for biodiversity conservation","authors":"Harold Opdenbosch ,&nbsp;Mark V. Brady ,&nbsp;Ivan Bimbilovski ,&nbsp;Rebecca Swärd ,&nbsp;Gordana Manevska-Tasevska","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Farmers are key to preserving and restoring semi-natural pastures (SNPs) while maintaining their environmental and cultural significance. To support these efforts, it is essential to create favorable conditions that encourages voluntary participation of farmers in agri-environment-climate measures (AECM) for SNP management. This study aims to assess acceptability of contract attributes within AECM for SNP management at the farm-level, including supported activity, payment, inspection, and sanction. Using a qualitative document analysis on data from semi-structured interviews, scientific literature, and policy documents, this study provides insights into farmers' perceptions of how these attributes affect effective implementation, along with recommendations for alternative solutions, and the potential of the Strategic Plan (SP) 2023–27. Results highlight concerns with current AECM, such as: i) misunderstandings between authorities and farmers on stipulated practices and conflicts with other regulations; ii) growing importance and reliance on payments; iii) apprehensions concerning potential interactions with unfavorable inspectors and punitive financial measures. Farmers expressed a strong desire for increased management flexibility, underscoring its significance over stringent contract attributes, and convey a need for improved communication with authorities. The SP 2023-27 offers an opportunity for improvements, mainly through administrative modifications via service digitalisation. As such, the results contribute to governance debates linked to contractual design and have implications for policy effectiveness, addressing both the appropriateness of AECM as a policy instrument and the capacity of governmental agencies to implement them effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 103448"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724002523","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmers are key to preserving and restoring semi-natural pastures (SNPs) while maintaining their environmental and cultural significance. To support these efforts, it is essential to create favorable conditions that encourages voluntary participation of farmers in agri-environment-climate measures (AECM) for SNP management. This study aims to assess acceptability of contract attributes within AECM for SNP management at the farm-level, including supported activity, payment, inspection, and sanction. Using a qualitative document analysis on data from semi-structured interviews, scientific literature, and policy documents, this study provides insights into farmers' perceptions of how these attributes affect effective implementation, along with recommendations for alternative solutions, and the potential of the Strategic Plan (SP) 2023–27. Results highlight concerns with current AECM, such as: i) misunderstandings between authorities and farmers on stipulated practices and conflicts with other regulations; ii) growing importance and reliance on payments; iii) apprehensions concerning potential interactions with unfavorable inspectors and punitive financial measures. Farmers expressed a strong desire for increased management flexibility, underscoring its significance over stringent contract attributes, and convey a need for improved communication with authorities. The SP 2023-27 offers an opportunity for improvements, mainly through administrative modifications via service digitalisation. As such, the results contribute to governance debates linked to contractual design and have implications for policy effectiveness, addressing both the appropriateness of AECM as a policy instrument and the capacity of governmental agencies to implement them effectively.
保护生物多样性的农业环境-气候措施中合同属性在农场一级的可接受性
农民是保护和恢复半天然牧场(SNP)并保持其环境和文化意义的关键。为了支持这些努力,必须创造有利条件,鼓励农民自愿参与半天然牧场管理的农业环境气候措施(AECM)。本研究旨在评估农户对农业环境-气候措施中的合同属性(包括支持活动、付款、检查和制裁)的接受程度。通过对来自半结构式访谈、科学文献和政策文件的数据进行定性文件分析,本研究深入了解了农民对这些属性如何影响有效实施的看法,以及对替代解决方案和《2023-27 年战略计划》(SP)潜力的建议。研究结果凸显了当前农业和农村经济管理中存在的问题,如:i) 管理机构和农民之间对规定做法的误解以及与其他法规的冲突;ii) 对付款的日益重视和依赖;iii) 对与不利检查人员的潜在互动和惩罚性财政措施的担忧。农民强烈希望增加管理灵活性,强调其重要性超过严格的合同属性,并表示需要改善与当局的沟通。2023-27 年度战略计划提供了一个改进的机会,主要是通过服务数字化进行行政改革。因此,研究结果有助于与合同设计相关的治理辩论,并对政策有效性产生影响,既涉及到将非强制性合同管理作为政策工具的适当性问题,也涉及到政府机构有效实施非强制性合同管理的能力问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信